Don’t Tread on Me Part II; Civil Libertarians under Fire Once again, Janet Napolitano Using the Janet Reno Playbook to go After Civil Libertarians:

Don’t Tread on Me Part II; Civil Libertarians under Fire Once again, Janet Napolitano Using the Janet Reno Playbook to go After Civil Libertarians:
By Marc Chamot

”Paranoia Schizophrenia is the real definition for the Janet Napolitano, and some of the current Liberal crops of Democrats in Washington, and for former AG Janet Reno’s mental complexes, “paranoia Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, and disabling mental illness. It affects men and women with equal frequency. People suffering from schizophrenia may have the following symptoms:

Delusions, false personal beliefs held with conviction in spite of reason or evidence to the contrary, not explained by that person's cultural context.

Hallucinations, perceptions (can be sound, sight, touch, smell, or taste) that occur in the absence of an actual external stimulus (Auditory hallucinations, those of voice or other sounds, are the most common type of hallucinations in schizophrenia.)

Disorganized thoughts and behaviors and disorganized speech.

Catatonic behavior, in which the affected person's body may be rigid and the person may be unresponsive”

American Civil Libertarians far outnumber the left-wing and right-wing groups according to a 2000 poll, 32% of American voters are centrists; 16% are libertarians; 14% are authoritarians; 13% liberal; 7% are conservative. We are kind of getting sick and tired of watching the other two minority groups, in wanting to dominate American politics and trample over our constitution, even though most Civil Libertarians usually lean conservative.

Are Washington Liberal Democrats becoming very nervous? A unified conservative and Civil Libertarians could become a 23% political power house again. That alliance hasn’t happened since the Bill Clinton and Janet Reno years of 1993.

I am absolutely sure of it, Washington Liberals aren’t just scared for the American people, the you and me crowds, the usual run-in-the-mill Civil Libertarians like us, they are more scared about this alliance and for their political hides, their futures, their demise for their left-wing political agendas, and they are reaching for ways that they can stamp out true opposition to their preconceived ideals. And they also want to keep their Federalism over state rights dream alive, no matter how wrong they are.

If any one has been following my blogs for the past two years, I have been bringing up these issues. I had predicted that there would be fear coming from our Washington politicians sooner or later and attacks against Civil Libertarians and conservatives would be resuming again.

Former President Bill Clinton's "Pit Bull" and point person, AG Janet Reno was used to go after Civil Libertarians in 1993.

If they haven’t learned their lessons from the FAILED Bill Clinton, and Janet Reno era when they took on Civil Libertarians, they’re doomed to repeat this mistake again.

Janet Napolitano said "Let me be clear: we monitor the risks of violent extremism taking root here in the United States," Napolitano said in a statement. "We don't have the luxury of focusing our efforts on one group; we must protect the country from terrorism whether foreign or homegrown, and regardless of the ideology that motivates its violence."

"Let me remind Miss Janet Napolitano that we the American people made the American government, we the American people put you in your position, we the American people pay your salaries and WE expect you to abide and carry the writs of our constitution, we the American people are refusing to sit back and keep on watching, as our constitution and state powers are being slowly stripped and torn apart."

After having said all of this, I will give President Barack Obama a lot of credit. President Obama has found out the hard-way that pursuing his radical left-wing agendas will not work in America.

The United States is not a “banana republics,” like Venezuela, Bolivia, and Brazil where its politics can lean left one minute and then right the next minute. Most Americans are traditionally centrist and most lean a little right of center. When radical left wing changes come about, of course, there are going to be serious contrary adversary reactions.

The United States is a nation that has centuries of experience in democracy, whereas “banana republics” only have decades.

I’m seeing a lot of restrains coming from President Obama to implement many of his unpopular left-wing agendas; actually he’s doing pretty much the opposite.

The banning of Mexican truckers coming into the states, getting tough on unfair trade practices like NAFTA and the WTO’s, the buy American initiatives, I will admit that the Democrats and he, have pretty much abandoned the immigration reforms, and amnesty for illegal aliens.

These pro-amnesty and open borders groups are blasting President Obama on a daily basis to act in their favor.

Even though with new alarming reports that show we’ve got disastrous immigration problems; more than 4 million anchor babies/children of illegal aliens were born in the United States. Report: Illegal immigrants having more kids in US : “Growing numbers of children of illegal immigrants are being born in this country, and they are nearly twice more likely to live in poverty than those with American-born parents, a report says.

The study released Tuesday by the Pew Hispanic Center highlights a growing dilemma in the immigration debate: Illegal immigrants' children born in the United States are American citizens, yet they struggle in poverty and uncertainty along with parents who fear deportation, toil largely in low-wage jobs and face layoffs in an ailing economy.

The analysis by Pew, a nonpartisan research organization, estimated that 11.9 million illegal immigrants lived in the U.S. Of those, 8.3 million were in the labor force as of March 2008, making up 5.4 percent of the U.S. work force, primarily in lower-paying farming, construction or janitorial work.

Roughly three out of four of their children _ or 4 million _ were born in the U.S. In 2003, 2.7 million children of illegal immigrants, or 63 percent, were born in this country.

Overall, illegal immigrants' children account for one of every 15 students in kindergarten through 12th grade.

Illegal immigrants also have become more geographically dispersed, increasingly passing up typical destinations like California in favor of jobs in newly emerging Hispanic areas in Southeastern states like Georgia and North Carolina.

In 2008, California had the most illegal immigrants at 2.7 million, double its 1990 number, followed by Texas, Florida, New York and New Jersey. Still, California's 22 percent share of the nation's illegal immigrant population was a marked drop-off from its 42 percent share in 1990.”

And we’ve still got a big problem with H1B and H2B visas, right when news reports have come out that we’ve got hundred and thousands of new college graduates coming out of college, most with no job prospects, and our government is still pandering to foreign prospects and keep importing cheaper foreign workers. This is absolutely absurd! Ineptness like this is what drives most Americans nuts.

We’ve still got many areas economically depressed such as: Fed: Economic picture bleak in St. Louis district “Overall economic activity over the past two months in the Federal Reserve Bank’s St. Louis District, which includes Louisville, “weakened further” as manufacturers and service sector businesses reported slowing activity.

The St. Louis District also includes Memphis, Tenn., and Little Rock, Ark.

Economic activity in the district closely tracked the entire nation, the Federal Reserve Bank reported in the latest edition of its monthly Beige Book report of current economic conditions, which was released Wednesday.”

And I truly believe now that President Barack Obama is very sincere in trying to address the economic situation, Obama addresses economy, tax plan on filing day
“President Obama touted his tax cut Wednesday as an important component of his plan to right the U.S. economy and put working families on a more prosperous path.

"My administration has taken far-reaching action to give tax cuts to the Americans who need them while jump-starting growth and job creation in the process," Obama said. "We start from the simple premise that we should reduce the tax burden on working people, while helping Americans go to college, own a home, raise a family, start a business and save for retirement. Those goals are the foundation of the American Dream, and they are the focus of my tax policy."

Appearing with the president on the national tax filing deadline were families affected by the economic downturn.

"Across America, families like the folks who have joined me here today have had tough choices forced upon them," Obama said. "Many have lost a job or are fighting to keep their business open. Many more are struggling to make payments, to stay in their home or to pursue a college education.

"These Americans are the backbone of our economy, the backbone of our middle class. ... They need a government that is working to create jobs and opportunity for them, rather than simply giving more and more to those at the very top in the false hope that wealth automatically trickles down."

All of these have been my pet issues on my blogs, and it seems that President Obama and the Democrats have pretty much satisfied some of my views and that they are trying to appease Civil Libertarians like me. But obviously they don’t like it. We are an intrusion to their left-wing agendas and goals, and what they do between now and the midterms, will determine if the Democrats will keep their majority in the U.S. congress.

So, I think that Janet Napolitano and Liberal Democrats may be overreacting a little here, and I think that if they simply take care of Americans, us, like they are supposed to, and like they are being PAID TO, and maybe just for once, Civil Libertarians might lighten-up a bit?

Chorus of Protest Grows Over Report Warning of Right Wing Radicalization:
“The government considers you a terrorist threat if you oppose abortion, own a gun or are a returning war veteran."

That's what House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said Wednesday in response to a Department of Homeland Security report warning of the rise of right-wing extremist groups.

Smith, who said the report on "right-wing extremism" amounts to "political profiling," said that DHS is "using people's political views to assess an individual's susceptibility to terror recruitment." He joins a growing chorus of protest from irate conservative groups that are protesting the report's findings.

The report, titled "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment," released last week by DHS' Office of Intelligence and Analysis, said while there is no specific information that domestic right-wing terrorists are planning acts of violence, it suggests acts of violence could come from unnamed "rightwing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, abortion, increasing federal power and restrictions on firearms -- and it singles out returning war veterans as susceptible to recruitment.

A senior Republican Judiciary Committee aide tells FOX News that the Obama administration "should immediately retract the report and apologize," saying that according to the report, pro-lifers, anyone who lost their jobs or are one of the thousands of military veterans who have fought to prevent another 9/11 could be suspect.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano defended the report Wednesday, saying it is part of an ongoing series of assessments to provide information to state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies on "violent radicalization" in the United States.

But the references to military veterans in the recent report angered conservatives.
"The department is engaging in political and ideological profiling of people who fought to keep our country safe from terrorism, uphold our nation's immigration laws, and protect our constitutional right to keep and bear arms," said Rep. Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla.,
Texas Rep. Lamar Smith accused the department of painting "law-abiding Americans, including war veterans, as 'extremists.'"

Indiana Rep. Steve Buyer, the ranking Republican on the House Veterans' Affairs committee, said it was "inconceivable" that the administration would consider military veterans a potential terrorist threat.

On the Net:
Homeland Security Department: http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm&usg=AFQjCNERcaUQA7Q6gJkw6aSitosYpNlZSw