The Marc Chamot Report Headline Animator

Guest Bloggers, Opposing Views & Link Exchanges, Are Always Welcomed at the Marc Chamot Report:

Addthis Sharing Gadget

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Rehabilitating a Broken Republican Party; is it Too Late?

Rehabilitating a Broken Republican Party; is it Too Late?
By Marc Chamot & Sources

"Polls indicate the Republican Party's in deep trouble. The most recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey suggests that while the favorable opinion of the Democratic Party has dropped the past few months, its still 12 points higher among Americans than that of the Republican Party,"

It’s without a doubt that the Republican Party is completely in disarray and damaged. With Democrats labels pinning the Republican Party as the “Party of No,”
it’s sticking in the public’s mind stronger than ever, just like Super Glue.

The typical argument line of this dying party is still being heard, “The Republican Party has strayed from our principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, individual responsibility and economic freedom,” said Chris Chocola, a former Indiana congressman who is head of Club for Growth, a group that has financed primary challenges against Republicans it considers insufficiently conservative.

“We have to adhere to those principles to rebuild the party. Those are the brand of the Republican Party, and people feel that we betrayed the brand.” Baloney, that’s not enough to make the party viable for regular folks!

Republican leaders in Washington argued that Republicans would be permanently marginalized unless they showed flexibility on social issues as well as economic ones. This is absolutely correct folks!

The Republican Party, mainly the conservatives are still bent on an old formula that is no longer working in today’s America.
Those aren’t enticing points for most Americans these days. They want a government that is more people oriented; jobs oriented, labor oriented, we want our industries that were lost because of NAFTA and WTO’s. We also want more controls of our southern border with Mexico, and more affordable healthcare for most folks, and less big business, corporate, and Wall Street coziness goings on.

That is exactly what the Republicans are going to hear when they begin their grand tour of the nation speaking to Americans. And as far as I see right now, I don’t see President Barack Obama and the Democrats moving quickly on those issues either, they are stonewalling them at the moment.

That is why I did not agree with some of my fellow conservative bloggers who supported the Tea Parties, and attacking President Barack Obama over gaffes and other nit pickings, this isn’t going to get the job done, he's just too doggone popular.

The Tea Parties didn’t make any sense, why weren’t they used when the Republicans under former President George Bush spent money like drunken sailors back then? And on top of it all, the Tea Parties didn’t do anything for the out of work Americans, or solve our border problems with Mexico.

It was a tax rebellion, but a good many of us aren’t too concerned about taxes, we’re just to busy wondering if we’re going to have a frikin’ job tomorrow. How are we going to pay our frikin mortgages and so forth?
We’re also wondering if our remaining manufactories are going to skip this country in favor for cheaper labor abroad. And we’re also worried about illegal immigrants who are constantly taking available jobs and dropping our wage structures around the country.
To take Barack Obama and his Democrats head on, the Republicans need to take on social issues that the Democrats have promised, but failed to deliver.

We’re in trouble folks, because social issues were totally ignored for eight whole years under George Bush and the Republicans, that’s why we’ve got a Barack Obama in the White House.
Neglected social issues are the only route that Republicans need to go by at this time, if they want any success of winning anything in the future. They have better pick and choose their battles far better than what they’re doing now.

From CNN:
Rep. Eric Cantor has suggested that this is an opportunity for GOP leaders to have a "two-way conversation" with the public to work things out for the party. He called for the National Council for a New America, with the idea to send party leaders across the country for a series of town halls on health care, the economy, energy and national security.

The goal is for the council's panel of experts is to listen to the American people and report back to House and Senate Republican leaders with new strategies for rehabilitating the party and winning elections in 2010.

"We can begin to lay out the solutions that Republicans have, listen to the American people about the challenges facing this country, and those that they face in the community," said Cantor, who played a key role in developing the effort. Watch what Cantor says about defining the Republican message »

Members of the council include Arizona Sen. John McCain, the former Republican presidential candidate; former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush; former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney; Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, GOP sources familiar with the plans told CNN.

The Republican congressional leadership is also slated to travel the country and attend town hall meetings.

Leaders signing an announcement about the initiative include Cantor, Rep. John Boehner, Rep. Mike Pence, Sen. Mitch McConnell, Sen. Jon Kyl and Sen. Lamar Alexander.

The council kicks off Saturday in Arlington, Virginia. Northern Virginia is one of the suburban areas that has shifted decidedly in favor of the Democrats in recent years -- it helped President Obama become the first Democratic presidential candidate to carry the state since 1964.
Republicans have been forced to rebuild after suffering demoralizing losses in 2006 and 2008. Democrats control the White House, both chambers of Congress and also hold more gubernatorial seats.

Asked about the state of the Republican Party, Obama cautioned Wednesday that "politics in America changes very quickly."

Given President Obama's command of Washington, it's a good idea for Republicans to take their case outside of the capital, said William Bennett, a CNN contributor and Republican strategist.
"Look, you have to face reality. Barack Obama owns Washington. The Democrats own Washington. So a good place to be is out in the country.

"[Obama's] a huge political figure. I don't agree with him, but the guy blocks the sun. He won the election. He commands everything in sight. He's got a Democratic Congress with him. The media still likes him very much," Bennett said.

From the New York Times:
With consensus growing among Republicans that the party is in its worst political position in recent memory, some conservatives applauded Mr. Specter’s departure. They said it cleared the way for the party to distance itself from its record of expanding government during the Bush years and to re-emphasize the calls for tax cuts and reduced federal spending that have dominated Republican thought for more than 30 years.

Senator John Cornyn of Texas, the head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said he would seek to recruit candidates who he thought could win in Democratic or swing states, even if it meant supporting candidates who might disagree with his own conservative views.
Mr. Cornyn said he was taking a page from Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, the last head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, who led his party to big gains by embracing candidates who, for example, opposed abortion rights or gun control.

“If you think about it, Schumer has been very good at this; I complimented him this morning in the gym,” Mr. Cornyn said, adding, “Some conservatives would rather lose than be seen as compromising on what they regard as inviolable principles.”

Senator Lindsay Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said: “We are not losing blue states and shrinking as a party because we are not conservative enough. If we pursue a party that has no place for someone who agrees with me 70 percent of the time, that is based on an ideological purity test rather than a coalition test, then we are going to keep losing.”

The debate broke out as the party found itself in a particularly dire state. Mr. Specter’s departure came a week after Republicans lost a special Congressional election in an upstate New York district with a significant Republican voter edge; as such, it underlined the extent the party was contracting, not only ideologically but also geographically.

In 2006, there were 55 Republicans in the Senate, compared with 45 Democrats. With Mr. Specter’s departure, there will be 40 Republicans. Depending on the outcome of the election between Norm Coleman and Al Franken in Minnesota, Democrats could end up with 60 votes, enough, assuming they hold the party together, to take away the minority party’s most powerful weapon, the filibuster.

The wide margin puts Democrats in a strong position as they prepare to deal with President Obama’s agenda on issues like health care and global warming.

Politics are cyclical; not long ago Karl Rove, at the time the chief political adviser to President George W. Bush, was boasting about the Republican Party enjoying a permanent majority.
The dominance now enjoyed by Democrats could prove equally transitory. Several Republicans said Democrats could suffer a backlash if economic policies pushed by Mr. Obama failed to lift the country out of a recession.

“These policies that he is pursuing expanding the size of the government are going to be policies which the country will find hard to accept when they look at the levels of debt and the levels of spending that they require,” said Senator Judd Gregg, Republican of New Hampshire.
Saying that their party should do more to draw economic contrasts with the Democrats, several Republicans said Mr. Specter’s departure was in effect a purification rite for the party that would make it better able to make its case to the public.

Patrick J. Toomey, a former head of the Club for Growth whose primary challenge to Mr. Specter led the senator to bow out in the face of what he thought was a probable defeat; said Republicans should be open to a “wide range of opinions on a wide range of issues.”
“But I think fundamental common ground that the vast majority of Republicans share is the belief in limited government, freedom and personal responsibility,” Mr. Toomey said.
Mr. Graham scoffed at the notion that the party was suffering because it was not conservative enough.

“Do you really believe that we lost 18-to-34-year-olds by 19 percent, or we lost Hispanic voters, because we are not conservative enough?” he said. “No. This is a ridiculous line of thought. The truth is we lost young people because our Republican brand is tainted.”

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

More Newspaper Woes Looming, Circulation Falling; Nonprofits & Going Online Models are Not Working:

More Newspaper Woes Looming, Circulation Falling; Nonprofits & Going Online Models are Not Working:
By Marc Chamot & Source: Andrew S. Ross

New reports show that newspapers’ circulations are dropping faster than ever, and new models like nonprofits and going online is just not working for them. What’s a newspaper to do?

The Obama administration says no way to the fast collapsing newspaper industries. Carl Shapiro, a member of the Obama administration told congress last week, that they don’t believe that the industry needs new exemptions from anti-trust laws.

But the news is getting bleaker for this industry, and new models for their very own survival don’t seem to be working either.

“The rate of decline in print circulation at the nation’s newspapers has accelerated since last fall, as industry figures released Monday show a more than 7 percent drop compared with the previous year, while another recent analysis showed that newspaper Web site audiences had increased 10.5 percent in the first quarter.”

The Miami Herald is still on the block with no buyers in sight. The McClatchy Bee’s Northern California’s premier newspapers are 2 million dollars in debt and faces delisting from the NYSE their shares are down to .53cents.

The New York Times posting quarterly loses of $74.2 million, their credit ratings has been pushed into junk status by Moody and Standard and Poor. Media News Group, the Bay Area behemoths got its creditors to hold off yanking its papers to cover billion dollar debts. And the San Francisco Chronicle is still using the ax, with new proposals to eliminate all home deliveries outside the city of San Francisco. All delivery routes just beyond San Francisco city and county limits are to be eliminated entirely by the end of the month.

Is nonprofit and going online the answer for these papers? There is also bad karma going against them in both of these regards.

Ideas have been thrown about like making newspapers nonprofits, but that model doesn’t seem to work either. Take the Christian Science Monitor for example; they eliminated all of their print editions after losing $18.5 million in 2008. And another nonprofit, the St Petersburg Times, owned by the nonprofit Poynter Institute is also going broke.

Hearst Corp’s now defunct Seattle Post Intelligencer’s website has fallen by one-third since they stopped printing. And it’s still falling at this moment.

Former staffers of the Rocky Mountain News who started their online newspaper gig, they all thought that they could attract over 50,000 of their former print customers. On Thursday they said that they wouldn’t be able to pursue the original business model, after only getting 3,000 paid subscribers. Now, one of its key investors into this venture wants staff reduced to ten writers. The Boston Globe is also facing imminent death soon.

Take for another example Asian Week. A San Francisco Asian/Chinese newspaper that had been publishing for over thirty years, they stopped printing around the first of the year and stayed online. But, according to Alexa.com, they used to be around the top 100,000 websites, since they stopped publishing, they have dropped well below that and they keep dropping like flies.

It definitely proves one thing, it takes a print publication to constantly advertise their websites, print helps bring in customers to their websites, but when the printing is over, most people forget or just don’t go back, because most of these websites have never fully established themselves on the Web, unlike bloggers who have.

It’s really tough to make it online, it’s a dog eat dog world out there. I will tell you as a blogger, because I know. It takes a whole lot of time and hard work, a lot of patience to build up a reputable blog; it is building up relationships with Google, other bloggers, fans, links, and feeds that net you readers.

I have seen my traffic through Google search engines quadruple, my Google page rank increase and my Alexa ratings climbing through the roof. Just look at this simple logic, good informative blogs always increase in readerships, while newspaper websites drop when they terminate their printing sector, why is that?

Like I had mentioned before in one of my past postings, when newspapers do decide to go online, they have got to use established bloggers on the Net, who can help them bring traffic to their sites. Just starting from scratch is virtually impossible.

Online newspapers and established bloggers are the only way to go. Trying to save your journalist’s jobs is fine and dandy, well deserved and very appreciative, but they don’t get you any traffic into your websites, unlike established bloggers who do.

Bloggers work the Net all of the time, they are established by Google and many other networks. They have thousands, and upon thousands of back links and feed subscribers that they can bring in to the online paper on the spot, whereas online papers don’t have.

That’s the plan that could help make web newspapers more competitive online. The real benefit in having paid bloggers working for you is that they know how to work the search engines, they network, and they can constantly work the web for your online venture.

It’s just plainly wrong to keep on ignoring the wealth of these people’s skills, who are out there just for the taking.

The bottom line, newspaper publishers have got to drop their biases, prejudices, and resentments towards Google and mainly “bloggers” if they want to make it online.

Fall in Newspaper Sales Accelerates to Pass 7%

Of the top 25 newspapers in the United States, all posted declines in circulation except for The Wall Street Journal, which eked out a 0.6 percent gain, according to figures released by the Audit Bureau of Circulations. For the others, the declines ranged from 20.6 percent for The New York Post, to a slight 0.4 percent drop for The Chicago Sun-Times.
Both The Post and The Journal are owned by the News Corporation, the media conglomerate controlled by Rupert Murdoch.

The new circulation numbers are “not very good, and probably a little worse than expected,” said Rick Edmonds, media business analyst at the Poynter Institute, a nonprofit organization that owns The St. Petersburg Times in Florida. Mr. Edmonds said he had expected an overall drop of roughly 5.5 percent.

The figures, which are based on reports filed by the individual papers, illustrated the continued migration of readers to the Internet and, in some cases, the effort by papers to shed unprofitable circulation.

“One shouldn’t be in denial that this represents people quitting newspapers to get news from the Web,” Mr. Edmonds said. “

Sunday, April 26, 2009

"It's going to happen, whether you like it or not." S.F. Mayor Gavin Newsom Using the No-Drama-Obama Internet Playbook Magic in Governor's Race:

"It's going to happen, whether you like it or not." San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom Using the No-Drama-Obama Internet Playbook Magic in California's Governor Race:
By Marc Chamot

A boozer, and a confirmed womanizer and cheater, this inept San Francisco mayor thinks that he’s going to be the next governor of California.

Mayor Gavin Newsom is a proven total moron as a politician, and a former pretty boy on the San Francisco board of supervisors, a well connected rich guy, who only got his position of power when former mayor Willie Brown appointed him for the new vacant position on the board back around 1997, now wants to be governor of California.

“In 1996, Newsom was appointed by San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown to the city’s parking and traffic commission. Soon he was elected president of the commission. In 1997, Brown appointed him to the city’s board of supervisors. Voters elected Newsom to the board in 1998 and re-elected him in 2000 and 2002”.

For a man who was silver spoon fed, a young rich brat, and who was deeply connected to Representative Nancy Pelosi, former state senator John Burton, and the San Francisco oil Getty family, every thing seemed to go his way.

This darling of a man along with Nancy Pelosi were pegged to be the new California Democratic political machine of the future, by the former corrupt San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown of the famed, and now defunct corrupt Burton-Brown political machine. It was like retiring the older machine for the younger generation kind of political machine, with plans laden to give taxpayer moneys to donors, friends and buddies of the new and old machine.

The former John Burton-Willie Brown machine hand picked Newsom’s and Nancy Pelosi’s new machine to be the dynasty for future California corruptive politics. See; ARE Newsom/Pelosi Machine Politics, a Burton/Brown Machine Wannabe still alive in San Francisco?

As San Francisco board member, Gavin Newsom was known as Willie Brown’s “Brown Nosed” and “Brown’s Butt Sniffer,” he pushed and supported every thing that former mayor Willie Brown pushed for; no matter how corruptive it was for the city of San Francisco.

Back in 2004 Gavin Newsom barely squeaked by a leftist Green and former San Francisco board of supervisor president Matt Gonzalez, who gave him fits during the mayoral race. Newsom had to pull out all of the stops just to win, and he brought with him most of the nationally powerful Democrats, including former President Bill Clinton to help him beat this tremendous Greenie.

People were just getting sick and tired of Willie Brown and in the same old corruptive political machine, and with its corruptive means year after year. It was a fight to the death for the machine, but finally Newsom did prevail for their future.

As soon as he became mayor there was that same sex marriage fiasco going on in his city.

Then was his infamous and idiotic, "It's going to happen, whether you like it or not," asinine comment of his, which galvanized a conservative uprising nationally and helped give President George Bush his second term.

But along came other missteps by this boy wonder. One was his constant boozing and partying, and the other was his womanizing and affairs with his former secretary, the wife of his best friend.

“Last week, the Mayor made a startling public announcement, confirming an affair with Ruby Rippey-Tourk.

The relationship began while she was working as his appointments secretary. Not only was she a subordinate, but she was also married to Newsom’s campaign manager. In a twist on the standard story, Newsom’s sex scandal involved betraying a close friend and trusted advisor.

In the wake of the announcement, Newsom has become the subject of nationwide news coverage and fodder for bloggers. While most seem likely to excuse the affair, what people are really concerned about is the Mayor’s apparent lack of judgment.”

That’s it! Lack of judgment folks! And this loon wants to be governor of California? Oh my! Oh my! This man isn't even qualified to be water boy for the San Francisco 49ers football team.

So now straw polls show that his practically dead last in the polls among Democrats. But he’s now taking a page out of Barack Obama’s campaign secrets. He thinks that he can be like President Barack Obama, winning through the Internet.

Barack Obama’s Internet Campaign Magic Revealed: The “Machinery of Hope” by Tim Dickinson; how Barack Obama amassed hundred of thousands of Supporters/Foot Soldiers Through the Internet to Push his Campaign Over the Top:

So Gavin Newsom basically wants to duplicate Obama’s Internet magic, to come out ahead with this election in his favor. It remains to see if it really works, but I have my doubt that it will.

First of all, Mayor Newsom has about 700,000 followers on Tweeter.com, but my doubts, are they all from California, and are they all California voters that can help him? I think that the Internet for President Barack Obama was much different than what it is for Mayor Gavin Newsom. Newsom is not running for national office unlike Barack Obama, who did.

Newsom cannot even compare himself to Barack Obama, he's very damaged goods indeed.

Secondly, this mayor has lots and lots of heavy baggage going against him. Mike DeNunzio the Chairman San Francisco Republican Assembly says of Mayor Newsom’s San Francisco’s sad legacy, “During his years as mayor San Francisco have had record crimes, deficits, debts, homelessness, broken streets, dirty streets and cuts in services.

with a budget of $6.5 million larger than twenty-states in our union, with $500 million dollars deficit and climbing, and with over 27,400 overpaid city employees and with a $4 billion dollars unfunded liability for city health benefits, record taxes, fees, parking fines, traffic citation fines, mandates and regulations’ that drive out and or just put businesses out of business.”

More about Mayor Gavin Newsom’s and his money bagmen, published by the San Francisco Chronicle in 2003:

Now, as city government bleeds red ink, Supervisor Gavin Newsom, 35, says the grit and drive he showed in building a small-business empire sets him apart in the 2003 race to become San Francisco's next mayor.

"As a business person who has created jobs, met a payroll and balanced the books, I am uniquely qualified to meet the new fiscal crisis," he wrote in a recent pitch to campaign donors. He portrays himself as a self-made businessman, but Newsom has reaped huge financial benefits from his ties to old money and power in San Francisco, particularly with his lifelong association with Gordon P. Getty, one of the nation's richest men.

Getty, 69, billionaire heir to an oil fortune and friend of Newsom's family for 50 years, helped Newsom become a millionaire by investing in every important venture of the supervisor's business career.

According to public records and documents Newsom himself provided: -- Getty, or trusts and firms he controls, is lead investor on 10 of Newsom's 11 businesses, including his PlumpJack group of wine, restaurant, resort and real estate ventures. "Plump Jack" is the name of an opera Getty wrote. Newsom's stake in those Getty-backed businesses is more than $6.9 million, according to a disclosure report filed last year with the Ethics Commission. Newsom says now that he overstated his share of one of the businesses, a development company, and has since gotten out of that venture. --

Newsom's annual income from 1996 to 2001 topped $439,000 per year, according to tax returns he provided. Most of it came in wages and dividends from the same Getty-backed concerns. -- Newsom's 2000 income ballooned to more than $1.3 million thanks to an $844,000 profit he made on the sale of a Pacific Heights house he bought with Getty's help, the returns show. -- A

Getty trust paid Newsom $169,000 for investment advice from 1997-2000, Newsom said. -- When the family-owned Getty Images photographic business took its stock public in 1996, Newsom was in on the initial public offering, buying $10,000 worth. Since then, he has made $60,900 profit on trades of the stock, the tax returns show. --

When Newsom wed San Francisco prosecutor Kimberly Guilfoyle, Getty and his wife, Ann, paid for a glittering reception at their Pacific Heights mansion. The gift section of Newsom's disclosure report states his half share of the reception's value was $116,708. Newsom described Gordon Getty as a lifelong friend, but said the billionaire's investments in his ventures are strictly business. His own hard work - not the Getty fortune - made him a success, Newsom said. "I started every one of those businesses," he told

The Chronicle during two lengthy interviews. "Conceived of them, wrote the business plans, got all the investors, and by no means are the investors exclusive to the Getty family. Quite the contrary." Nevertheless, Newsom's financial dealings with Getty feed a "rich kid" persona being exploited by his political foes - "This campaign is going to be a class war against me," he said. The financial dealings already have roiled his campaign.

On Feb. 14, in response to a Chronicle story about omissions and mistakes in his financial disclosure statements, Newsom amended his filings to report $2.1 million in loans he had received from Getty. BORN TO POWERA fourth-generation San Franciscan, Gavin Christopher Newsom was born Oct. 10, 1967, to William and Tessa Newsom. From birth, he was connected to the city's elite.

His grandfather, William A. Newsom, was a confidant of Edmund G. "Pat" Brown, the former San Francisco district attorney and two-term governor. His aunt was married to the brother-in-law of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco, the House minority leader.

His father, retired state appellate Justice William Newsom, is a longtime friend of Edmund "Jerry" Brown, also a former governor and now Oakland mayor; John Burton, the powerful state senator from San Francisco; and especially Getty - son of legendary oilman J. Paul Getty - his friend since they were classmates at St. Ignatius High School in the 1940s.

As a youth, Getty kept a room at the Newsom family's Marina District home, and later Justice Newsom served as a Getty lawyer and trusted family adviser, Justice Newsom recalled in an interview.

In 1973, the abduction of a grandson of J. Paul Getty made international headlines when the kidnappers severed the victim's ear and mailed it to his mother. To win the youth's freedom, Justice Newsom and others traveled to southern Italy to deliver the $2.7 million ransom to intermediaries dressed as priests, he said. Gavin Newsom said his childhood wasn't easy. His parents broke up when he was 2; his father moved to Placer County, while his late mother, Tessa, raised Gavin and his younger sister, Hilary, in San Francisco, sometimes working three jobs as a secretary, bookkeeper and waitress. Newsom said he also had "pretty severe" dyslexia, a disorder that causes difficulty with writing and spelling, and sometimes reading and working with numbers.

It still affects him today. Newsom said he received a private education at the French-American bilingual school and Notre Dame de Victoire in the city, and, after he was unable to gain admission to a prep school, at public Redwood High School in Marin County. When he needed help, his family's contacts came in handy, he acknowledged. While applying for college, Newsom said, his family "called everybody we knew," including lawyer John Mallen, a friend of his father and a member of the Board of Regents at Santa Clara University, where he was given a partial baseball scholarship.

After graduating and earning a real estate license, Newsom said, he visited Walter Shorenstein, the real estate baron and major Democratic Party fund- raiser, who knew Newsom's father and grandfather. At that 1991 meeting, Shorenstein told an aide, " 'Let's see what we can do at the Russ Building for Gavin,' " Newsom recalled. He said he spent an "intense" year working as an $18,000-per-year assistant for the Shorenstein Co. PLUMPJACK PARTNERSHIPSWhile still working for Shorenstein, Newsom formed his first business partnership, PlumpJack Associates, to open a wine shop on Fillmore Street.

His partner was Gordon Getty's son, William or "Billy" as he's called, whom Newsom had known since boyhood. He said Gordon Getty invested between $7,500 and $15, 000. The wine shop opened in 1992. Other ventures followed. By last year, Newsom had created a network of limited partnerships and holding companies to own and operate businesses and investments in San Francisco, Napa Valley, Squaw Valley and Maui. Most are part of the PlumpJack group, which in addition to the wine shop includes the upscale PlumpJack Cafe, also on Fillmore Street, the PlumpJack winery and an online wine outlet.

Other Newsom partnerships own two popular Cow Hollow night spots, the venerable Balboa Cafe and the MatrixFillmore bar, which features designer cocktails, a plasma screen video system and tables shaped as letters S, E and X. Other partnerships run the Squaw Valley Inn, or are associated with PlumpJack and Balboa cafes at the ski resort. And while Newsom contended that Gordon Getty is only one financial backer of many, records show the billionaire is Newsom's top outside investor, either individually or through his firms and family trusts.

Getty owns 49 percent of the concern that manages all the PlumpJack businesses; 96 percent of the winery; 96 percent of the partnership that runs the Squaw Valley Inn; and more than 80 percent of Newsom's real estate development firm (recently, Getty and Judge Newsom bought him out, Newsom says). Getty has a smaller stake in the other businesses, but he's still the lead outside investor in most. Getty declined to be interviewed for this story.

In response to written questions, he said he treats Newsom like a son and invested in Newsom's first business because of that relationship. "After that," he said, "the reason for my further investments was the success of the first." Getty's son Billy also invested in five businesses, and other Gettys, including Gordon's wife, Ann, own stakes in some.

Other investors represent a slice of upper-strata San Francisco: a firm associated with Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi; high-society plastic surgeon Jack Owsley; even TV newscaster Ross McGowan, whose morning news show has often showcased Newsom the politician. POLITICAL MOVESNewsom, who told a reporter in 1998 that he wanted to be president of the United States, said he got into politics by volunteering on Mayor Willie Brown's 1995 campaign and hosting a fund-raiser for him in PlumpJack Cafe's private dining room.

In April 1996, Newsom was part of a San Francisco entourage that flew on the Getty family jet to a celebration in the mayor's hometown of Mineola, Texas. Three months later, Brown put Newsom on the city Parking and Traffic Commission and in 1997 appointed him to the Board of Supervisors, filling a spot viewed in the political arena as reserved for a "straight, white male." He's been re-elected three times.

As a supervisor, Newsom was known for spearheading reform of the Municipal Railway and for forcing all city departments to write customer service plans. His signature success, however, is his Care Not Cash ballot measure, which won in a landslide Nov. 5. It calls for ending cash aid to the homeless in favor of beefing up the city's system of shelter, counseling and treatment services.

To pass Care Not Cash, Newsom barnstormed the city, proselytizing on the virtue of eliminating the cash handouts to keep the homeless from spending their money on drugs and alcohol. The measure created a political base - volunteers, donors, campaign staff - for his mayoral run. SOME PROBLEMSAt times, Newsom's business affairs have interfered with his official duties:

Six times, he had to recuse himself from voting because of conflict-of- interest concerns. Three recusals arose from Newsom's stake in a real estate firm whose legal entanglements brought the company to the edge of a scandal involving former Planning Commission President Hector Chinchilla.

Chinchilla faces criminal charges for allegedly working as a legal consultant to three developers who had matters requiring Planning Commission approval. Chinchilla said he broke no laws because he never voted on the matters. Court records show that in 2000, Chinchilla worked for yet another developer with business before the Planning Commission: Ecker-Folsom Properties, the real estate firm in which Newsom was an investor.

Ecker-Folsom was run by Brian Bock, a developer and Newsom friend. Newsom said that in 1996 his PlumpJack Development Fund, which he owned with Gordon and Billy Getty, bought a 38 percent share of the firm. Ecker-Folsom owned a former coffee warehouse on Folsom Street. In 1999, court records show, the firm leased it out as office space to the e-mail firm Critical Path Inc. for $100,000 per month. But the building had a city planning permit for live-work lofts, not offices.

And soon landlord and tenant were locked in a bitter legal dispute over who would pay the estimated $800,000 cost to get the permit changed so Critical Path could move in. In a suit filed in San Francisco Superior Court, Critical Path claimed Ecker-Folsom was responsible: in lease negotiations, Bock said he had hired Walter Wong, an influential permit expediter, "to take care of" any permit issues. Ecker-Folsom said the permit was the tenant's problem, and threatened that if Critical Path wouldn't pay for the permit, it would terminate the lease.

The lawsuit said the threat came in a letter from Ecker-Folsom's law firm, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, where Chinchilla was a partner. A copy of the letter was sent to Chinchilla. Bock says Chinchilla also sat in on one meeting about the matter, "representing me and Ecker-Folsom." The Planning Commission, with Chinchilla absent, ultimately granted the permit. Ecker-Folsom and Critical Path settled their suit. Newsom said he had "no idea" about Chinchilla's role, describing himself as a passive investor in the project who wasn't apprised of what Bock was doing. Bock confirms this. Newsom also said he never spoke to Chinchilla or any other planning commissioner about the project. When asked whether he thought it was appropriate for the partnership to retain Chinchilla's firm, he replied: "It's up to you. I mean, I assume Brian did everything right. If there's something wrong, then I'm outraged by it, but if there is nothing wrong I have no problem with it." Later in the interview, he railed against Chinchilla, saying it was "a disgrace, a black eye on the city, an outrage" that he had hired himself out as a planning consultant while on the commission. Newsom said he cut his ties to Ecker-Folsom in December, when he sold his stake in PlumpJack Development to his father and Getty.

He also said he gave up his title of president and is no longer involved in operations at the management firm that runs his PlumpJack businesses. Stepping back from and divesting of his businesses is part of his preparation to run for mayor, he said. If he wins, Mayor Newsom will likely find himself on a tightened personal budget and facing potential conflicts arising from the businesses he still owns. The mayor earns $167,192 a year.

The City Charter specifically bars the mayor from having any other job, but not from being a business owner. "The Mayor shall devote his or her entire time and attention to the duties of the office, and shall not devote time or attention to any other occupation or business activity," it reads.

The City Attorney's Office has interpreted that to mean San Francisco's mayor cannot be paid any salary for outside work, though Newsom said he still would be able to draw dividend income from his businesses.Public records show Newsom has $2.3 million in loans on his current Pacific Heights home - a $1.3 million first mortgage from a bank and a $1 million second from a Getty trust.

He says his payments top $12,000 per month. Newsom said that in addition to his share of profits distributed by his businesses, he and his wife, Kimberly, can still count on her prosecutor's salary, once she returns from a leave of absence taken for the mayor's race. Besides, he said, he didn't purchase his house to live in it for long, explaining that he's gotten in the habit of buying, remodeling and selling his homes - and not minding living without a stick of furniture save for a bed and television.

"I don't have a grand lifestyle," he said. "One of the great things about owning restaurants is you eat at a restaurant. I have some of the most modest restaurant bills in America. There's nothing particularly grandiose about my lifestyle." He makes the point over and over again. He's not that rich, and what he has, he earned. "I developed strategies and I created opportunities," he said. "I executed. I implemented.

I produced results and I did it over and over again. . . . No one ever knocked on my door saying, "Gavin, this is all yours.' " Gavin Christopher Newsom Born: San Francisco, Oct. 10, 1967 Education: Bachelor's degree, political science, Santa Clara University, 1989 Work: Entrepreneur in wine, restaurant, bar, resort and real estate ventures Politics: Democrat, member San Francisco Board of Supervisors, former city Parking and Traffic Commission president Hero: Robert F. Kennedy IF ELECTED, VENTURES GO INTO BLIND TRUSTSan Francisco Supervisor Gavin Newsom says he wants to enter the mayor's race "clean" - unburdened by potential conflicts of interest arising from his business ventures and partnerships.

To that end, Newsom says that if elected he'll place all his holdings in a blind trust. "I want to come into this race clean, absolutely focused on a set of priorities that will make a difference for San Francisco," he told The Chronicle. "I just want to remove any expectation of impropriety in terms of any potential conflict."

Typically, politicians use blind trusts to keep investment portfolios at arm's length by empowering a trustee to trade stocks and bonds. Newsom said he plans to designate Robert Goldberg, his business partner and president of his PlumpJack Management Group, as his trustee.

However, Newsom also said he intends to maintain his stake in his PlumpJack group of wine, restaurant, bar and resort ventures and would rely on dividends from the businesses to supplement his City Hall income. Other businessman-mayors have confronted similar issues. Last year, in an agreement with New York's Conflict of Interest Board, Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire media company founder, agreed to sell as much as $45 million in stocks in nearly 100 publicly traded companies, many of which do business with New York City government.

Bloomberg also resigned as chief executive of his Bloomberg L.P. worldwide media firm, but retained his ownership of the firm. The agreement called for him to recuse himself as mayor from matters involving Merrill Lynch, which owned 20 percent of his company, and issues involving cable television franchises.

Former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan set up a blind trust after his 1993 election. He also resigned from his law firm. Riordan's trust held stock and other interests, including his stake in a Los Angeles restaurant. Assets Newsom holds through his trust still would be subject to the state's annual economic disclosure requirements. He also could still be prohibited from making, participating in making or seeking to influence governmental decisions in which he has a financial interest. - Chuck Finnie, Rachel Gordon and Lance Williams

BUILDING A SMALL-BUSINESS EMPIRESupervisor Gavin Newsom, 35, has become a multimillionaire through a series of successful entrepreneurial ventures since the early 1990s. Newsom ventures backed by Gordon P. Getty: . PlumpJack Associates L.P. Formed: June 14, 1991 Business: PlumpJack Wines shop Location: 3201 Fillmore St., San Francisco . PlumpJack Cafe Partners L.P. Formed: Nov. 3, 1993 Business: PlumpJack Cafe restaurant Location: 3127 Fillmore St., San Francisco Partners: television actor Ed Asner and others . Villa Encinal Partners L.P./ Airelle Wines, Inc. Formed: March 1, 1995 Business: PlumpJack winery Location: 620 Oakville Cross Road, Oakville, Napa County . CNCML L.P./SVI Management Inc. Formed: Oct. 20, 1994 Business: PlumpJack Squaw Valley Inn, PlumpJack Cafe offshoot Location: 1920 Squaw Valley Road, Olympic Valley, Placer County .

Balboa Cafe Partners L.P. Formed: July 10, 1995 Business: Balboa Cafe bar and grill Location: 3199 Fillmore St., San Francisco . PlumpJack Development Fund L.P. Formed: May 21, 1996 Business: Real estate investments Location: 3201 Fillmore St., San Francisco . Pierce Street Partners L.L.C. Formed: Aug. 24, 1998 Business: MatrixFillmore bar Location: 3138 Fillmore St., San Francisco .

PlumpJack.com L.L.C. Formed: April 28, 1999 Business: PlumpJack Wines shop Noe Valley branch, online wine sales Location: 4011 24th St., San Francisco . Hilbrook L.L.C. Formed: June 8, 2000 Business: PlumpJackSport retail clothing Location: 1920-1995 Squaw Valley Road, Olympic Valley, Placer County . Balboa Squaw Valley Partners L.L.C. Formed: Oct. 25, 2000 Business: Balboa Cafe offshoot at Squaw Valley ski resort Location: 1995 Squaw Valley Road, Olympic Valley, Placer County ENTREPRENEURIAL PARTNERSMembers of Gavin Newsom's wine, restaurant, bar, resort and real estate partnerships since 1991:

Kevin & Bronwyn Brunner, John Burton, Casey and Michelle Cadwell, Bob and Barbara Callan, Frank Caufield, Donna Chazen, Lawrence Chazen, Joe & Victoria Cotchett, Michael & Hilary Decesare, Philip DeLimur, Don Dianda, Gretchen Dianda, Edward Everett, Richard Freemon, James Fuller, Stanlee Gatti, Robert Gerry, Andrew Getty, Ann Getty, Anna Getty, Chris Getty, Gordon Getty, Mark Getty, Peter Getty, Ronald Getty, Tara Getty, William "Billy" Getty, Robert Goldberg, Florianne Gordon, Stu Gordon, Gordon Goletto, David Goodman, Arthur Groza, Richard & Martha Guggenhime, Tony and Anthony Guilfoyle, Shelly Guyer, James & Shea Halligan, Bob & Jill Hamer, Erin Howard, Thomas Huntington, Isolep Enterprises

(Paul and Nancy Pelosi family personal investment company), Peter Jacobi, Gaye Jenkins, Jeffrey Kanbar, Chad Kawai, David Lamonde, John Larson, Rob Lavoie, Leavitt/Weaver interior designers, Marc Leland, Maryon Davies Lewis, Anne McCutcheon, Chris McCutcheon, Ross McGowan, Rich McNally, Robert & Carole McNeil, Paul Mohun, Robert Mohun, Jeff Morin, Sara Moughan, Terry Moughan, Brian Mueth, Bob Naify, Marshall Naify, John Nees, Barbara Newsom, Brennan Newsom, Catherine & David Newsom, Gavin Newsom, Patrick Newsom,
Tessa Newsom, William Newsom, John O'Hara, Jack Owsley, Pacific Design, Matt Pelosi, Robynne Piggott, James Samuel Powers, Elizabeth Rice, Jeremy Scherer, Paul Scherer, Gary Schnitzer, Steve & Theresa Selover, Steve Siino, Trevor Traina, Chris Vietor, Francesca Vietor, Kenneth Weeman, Nicki West, Justin & Aridne Williams, Kevin Williams, Thomas & Kiyoko Woodhouse.

E-mail the writers at cfinnie@sfchronicle.com, rgordon@sfchronicle.com and lwilliams@sfchronicle.com.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/23/MN245262.DTLThis article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Monday, April 20, 2009

Obama Chavez's Book Choice is not to be desired; Eduardo Galeano’s Hate Book led hundreds of Innocent Americans/Europeans to their Unfortunate Doom:

Obama Chavez's Book Choice is not to be desired; Eduardo Galeano’s Hate Book led hundreds of Innocent Americans/Europeans to their Unfortunate Doom:
By Marc Chamot

What Hugo Chavez, and Eduardo Galeano’s book to President Barack Obama represents, should be very troubling for Americans and Europeans. It could be of real concern for the future of the United States and Europe.

“Eduardo Galeano’s book is a hate book.

The book alone that this man wrote about Americans and Europeans as being the “the evil rich American and European thieves, who are stealing and raping our lands.” Accusing them of exploiting and raping their lands, like thieves that come into the night, and who keeps them poor.

His book caused so much damage; it caused so much unnecessary grief, and hatred towards Americans and Europeans that it is still going on today.”

Most illegal immigrants from Central and South America who come into the United States, they still carry their Anti-American, left-wing resentments towards America, because of this book.

I was born in Latin America back around 1958. My first childhood years there, as a white fair skinned individual of European descent, I felt those anti-Gringo racism of hate which persisted.

Back in the sixties, while still living in Latin America, there were always these anti-American and anti-European sentiments among Latin Americans, but they never were so bad, until after this racist, journalist/writer Eduardo Galeano’s 1971 book, which infuriated many Latin Americans, and created so much hate, anger, and resentments towards Europeans, but mainly Americans, from the coast of Brazil, Colombia, to Bolivia, Peru, Colombia, Mexico and other countries.

This book alone caused the unnecessary confiscations of thousands of American/European industries and investments, kidnappings and including the murders of many innocent Americans, and European tourists, and businessmen through out the decades, from Central America to South America, ever since the book was published.

Right after World War II, the United States and Europe had an industrial revolution, all of the war effort industries, were converted for civilian use. With this entire explosion came the demand for more affordable oil, gas and other natural resources. And at the time, Latin America was ripe for the oil industries to blossom.

The American and the European oil companies and other industries all went to Latin America; where they mainly went to Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Venezuela and Chile. They made their deals with despots and dictators of these banana republics at the time. Other natural resources were in high demand, like copper, sulfur, lumber and others.

But no sooner a deal was being made, these oil companies after investing millions upon millions of dollars, where these unstable governments would overthrow their leaders through coup d’états, and they would immediately nationalize, legally steal their oil and gas industry and other investments.

They were all basically stealing these companies’ oil rig equipments, machinery, transportation logistics, pipelines and so forth. Other industries were also being affected by some of these despots, such as copper mining, banking and other industries.

Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is a prime example of one of those thieves in action, who sucked in foreign investors and their money dry, then to steal it all away from them. Fidel Castro did it in 1959, Chile’s Salvador Allende tried to do it in 1970, and Chavez did it around 1998.

The rise of Cuba’s Fidel Castro in 1959 and the communist movement in Latin America were the start of anti-American and Anti-European movement.

However, the United States government couldn’t sit still and watch their industries being STOLEN by these GREEDY despots. Under presidents John F. Kennedy to Richard Nixon, we did have some American government sanctioned and a foreign political assassinations and backing up coup d’états.

An attempt on Fidel Castro’s life for one, and the other was the CIA sanctioned overthrow of former president of Chile’s Salvador Allende in 1973.

This leftist president was elected in 1970 and immediately nationalized, stole, American copper mining industries and banks, but President Richard Nixon wasn’t about to let that happen, the CIA in conjunction with Augusto Pinochet, then leader of the Chilean army orchestrated the 1973 coup d’état that killed and got rid of this leftist scoundrel Allende.

And also according to Wikipedia “Allende, upon assuming power, he began to carry out his platform of implementing a socialist program called La vía chilena al socialismo ("the Chilean Path to Socialism"). This included nationalization of large-scale industries (notably copper mining and banking). The Allende government also announced it would default on debts owed to international creditors and foreign governments.”

“Allende was accused of disregarding the courts, attempting to restrict freedom of speech, and supporting unauthorized seizures of farms and private industry for the purpose of establishing state control of the economy. The Chamber of Deputies also attacked Allende for seeking to "establish a totalitarian system absolutely opposed to the representative system of government established by the Constitution." However, a majority in the Senate still held firm for Allende.”

Unfortunately for Chile, they were gripped with years of relentless authoritarian and deadly dictatorship rule under Augusto Pinochet.

The sad truth about Eduardo Galeano’s Book that was given to President Barack Obama by Hugo Chavez:

Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent (in Spanish Las venas abiertas de América Latina) is an essay written by Uruguayan journalist Eduardo Galeano in 1971.

“In Open Veins of Latin America Galeano analyzes the history of Latin America as a whole, from the time period of the European discovery of the New World to contemporary Latin America arguing against European and later U.S. economic exploitation and political dominance over the region. The Library Journal review stated, "Well written and passionately stated this is an intellectually honest and valuable study."

His book also caused so much unnecessary damage to many American and European tourists all around Central to South America. Relentless kidnappings and even murders were very common. And now illegal immigrants are coming here, with their anti-American, take everything, give me; you owe me, mentality that this book portrays.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Newspaper Industry’s looking into Napster & Music Industry Lawsuits to Find Legal and Legislative Measures to protect their News Contents on the Web:

Newspaper Industry’s looking into Napster & Music Industry Lawsuits to Find Legal and Legislative Measures to protect their News Contents on the Web:
By Marc Chamot

If the newspaper industries have their way, they will soon want to be compensated for their published works on the Internet.

They are all waiting for the opportune time, for that great landmark case of opportunity that will let them do it. They are waiting for something like what happened with the music industries ten years ago, they want another Napster case that could swing the Internet pendulum for profits going their way.

But for as long as they think that Google, other news aggregator sites and bloggers are supposedly stealing their stuff, they are all just as content to be calling us pirates at this moment.

Newspapers are watching and studying the music industries’ success on the Internet, so to see if they can duplicate it for themselves.

Absolutely, had the Recording Industry Association of America not sued Napster, the recording industry would be worse off than what they are today.

The associated press said that they would seek “legal and legislative remedies” to stop websites from printing their contents and it could start a new precedent regulating news contents on the Net.

Why does it matter? Studies have shown that three-fourths of the news heard and written about is derived from newspapers.

But unfortunately, there is a big problem for newspapers and for them to even dream of comparing themselves to the music industries’ success on the Internet. No one can compare the two; they are totally two different items.

First of all, a song or published music is technically intellectual property, an owned property; music is entertainment, just as video games, movies and so forth, whereas news publications are information, and after all, the entire Internet is the information superhighways. Music is not information, movies are not information and neither are video games. That’s what keeps them apart.

Everyone knows that the Internet is an open forum for free information. Newspapers should have known that their stuff would be passed on, and on, from site to site. That is what the Internet is all about.

Newspapers are missing the real point of what the Internet is really all about. They want to make it a profitable venture by locking out their written materials from the general public along the way for more profits.

Most newspapers know that the Internet is more about national and international news. It’s something that newspapers don’t do themselves in journalism, newspapers are traditionally more localized.

Most people on the net, like people on the East Coast couldn’t care less of what the San Francisco Chronicle do in a story about its city supervisors, or developments going on in an old abandoned naval site, and it is also vise versa, people on the West Coast couldn’t care less about local happenings of New York.

When a big national story comes out, like a mass shooting of some kind, any big breaking news stories, which is being carried by thousands of newspapers’ websites world-wide and being carried along by CNN, Fox News and other major networks. So how are they going to differentiate from where their stories came from? They can’t. Unlike the music, movies, and Videos games industries, where they can.

That is why most bloggers and news aggregators give credits and references of the news source. This is what drives traffic to most newspapers’ websites. When they are the source of a news story, it brings in countless of additional web traffic that they would normally never had.

Newspapers know full well in the value of the Internet when they do come out with big breaking news stories. They get insurmountable amounts of traffic generated into their websites. They also know that if they don’t cover the story, then someone else will.

"The American “press” has special constitutional protections. They are our gate keepers, and our eyes into government. They aren’t allowed to be a monopoly. Even though they are allowed to write about public figures, they also have special protections from libel laws. With all that alone, they cannot legally embark on locking out information that could be very critical to American people's welfare, safety and other standards."

Newspapers can charge for its contents, but most Internet users, bloggers and readers are into national and international news. They will lose the national and international traffic into their websites. It’s a proven fact. American national and international politics is a wider subject of interest on the Net, and that is more widely covered and read than any local happenings.

The fallout of charging for web contents:

According to Alexa.com, the Internet’s premier website traffic count in the world, the San Francisco Chronicle’s free news website sfgate.com has traffic rank of 1,021, and 36,123 sites linked in, while its immediate competitor to the north, the San Jose Mercury News a paid website has a traffic count of 2,832 and 13,901sites linked in. According to Alexas’ complex ranking system formula, the lower the number is bigger and better. The Chronicle is almost three times bigger on the Net and they are roughly about the same size in total print distribution.

Take a look at Google News, the newspaper industries’ key foe and the industry’s brunt’s of complaints. All of their links are mainly national and international news. There is nothing local, unless it’s a big breaking crime story or a political scandal that makes national headlines.

The sad truth of the matter is that most newspapers across this land, are finally realizing that local news alone does not drive their print newspapers and websites.

National news, what is happening in Washington DC, happenings in Cuba, and elsewhere, and with our new president Barack Obama is what’s driving news networks all over. Knowing that, people can get far better verities of views on these subject matters on the Net, than the actual newspaper’s coverage. They know that and they want that piece of the pie all to themselves.

Practically every newspaper in the country uses the main section for world and national news, while local news are dug in deeper inside their newspapers.

If print newspapers really want to survive, my solution to their problems is very simple:

If newspapers really feel that the Internet is that certain evil that is really destroying their industry, they’ll have to make a choice, and my solution?

Either charge for your contents on your website, or GET-OFF the Internet if you don’t want to keep providing any more free information to the world. And stop blaming the Internet when you stubbornly keep posting your news stories on there, just as AP keeps on doing, but wants to sue. Don’t be calling us and Google pirates, when we do source and link your stories that you keep on putting in plain sight for the whole world to see.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Foreign Mercenaries Hired Through Suspected Internet Social Network to Kill President of Bolivia:

A Bolivian Government Sanctioned Murders? Foreign Mercenaries Hired Through Suspected Internet Social Network to Kill President of Bolivia:
By Marc Chamot

How quickly the topic changes, Updated April 18th 2009:

"Wow Folks, Shocking! I’m sorry folks: I’ve just viewed the Bolivian TV Network showing the morbid photos of these poor dead men, I have NO DOUBT in my mind that these poor souls were MURDERED by the Bolivian government of Evo Morales and its police.

They all took similar and various coincidental bullet shots in the chests, they were all undressed as if they were in bed sleeping, and the most suspicious thing about it all, NONE of these photos show any of them having any weapons by their side or look like they were in a thirty minute firefight.

The Bolivian government will have a whole lot of explaining to do to the Europeans, mainly Ireland and Hungary, for the MURDER of its citizens, and I would possibly push for the deepest economical sanctions against Evo Morales and his country of Bolivia soon."

Updated & thanks to commentor, "One thing for sure is that there is more to this story to come out."

There is a new meaning for Internet social Networks these days, and now people can go there and hire professional killers to kill their presidents.

A big news story is brewing abroad at this very minute, a story that went largely ignored by the American mainstream media, it is being talked about in every corner of the world, except in the United States.

Yesterday, the Bolivian government apparently gunned down, and killed three suspected murder-for-hires, well trained European mercenaries to kill, left-winger president Evo Morales of Bolivia.

New Revelations; was it a Bolivian Government Sanctioned Murder?

Hungarians involved in plot against Bolivian president - VIDEO
Friday, 17 April 2009

"Bolivian police shot dead three men and arrested two others in a crackdown on what they called a "terrorist gang" which had allegedly been preparing a plot against Bolivian President Evo Morales. According to local reports, the gang included some Hungarian members as well.

The Bolivian El Deber news agency reported on its website that police had circled the group in Hotel Las Americas in Santa Cruz in the early hours of Thursday, killing Eduardo Rozsa Flores, Arpad Magyarosi ands Michael Martin Dwyer, and arresting Mario Tadic and Elod Toaso. Police said that Magyarosi and Toaso were Hungarian nationals, Rozsa and Tadic Croatian, and Dwyer Irish.

Zoltan Brady, editor-in-chief of Hungarian literary magazine Kapu, which had employed Rozsa Flores and published several of his books, said he was convinced that the group had not been involved in a plot of any kind.

Brady said he had talked to Rozsa Flores two days ago, adding that his colleague had gone to Bolivia in May 2008 "to fight against its communist government" and for the independence of the province of Santa Cruz. "Eduardo lived in the jungle and was involved in regular fights... he was a soldier, a partisan, fighting together with thousands of others in the jungle," Brady said.

He also added that he thought that Rozsa Flores and the others had been executed rather than killed in a fire fight.

Bolivian Vice-President Alvaro Garcia Linera branded the group as championing a "far-right fascist ideology" and blamed them for former bomb attacks on the house of a minister and a cardinal. The vice-president claimed that they were plotting to kill President Morales.

Rozsa-Flores acted the lead in a Hungarian feature film shot in 2001 under the title "Chico". He was born in Santa Cruz in 1960 of a Hungarian father and Spanish mother. The family moved to Chile in 1972, then to Sweden and, in 1975, to Hungary.

Graduating from a Hungarian university and dubbing himself a "conservative, anarchist world revolutionary," he fought in the Croatian war in the early 1990s. In recognition of his heroism, Croatian President Franjo Tudjman promoted him to the rank of major.

In 2003 Rozsa Flores was spokesman of a dissident organisation calling itself Iraqi Independent Government before quitting them later. In the meantime, he became deputy president of the Hungarian Islamic Community. Over the past few years he maintained close links with the Hungarian far-right."

It looks like the Internet social network in question is http://www.bebo.com/ a primarily Irish network. That’s where one of its key players, Irishman Michael Dwyer had his so called professional resume of mercenary life and his accomplishments. As usual, when these networks get bad publicity, they tear down and remove profiles.

And now, here are some of these people having a field day over this, even Americans are being ridiculed over our supposed gun craze, that these people imagine.

Is this the Irish would-be assassin of Evo Morales?

Sure fits. Thanks to some quick work by reader RM, check out this Bebo page on a certain Michael Dwyer.Let's check the points in common1) Is Irish2) Loves guns and fancies himself as a sniper3) Is definitely in South America and according to messages left by friends is in Bolivia4) Has Bruce Willis's "The Jackal" as the answer to his "What kind of Assassin are You?" profile box5) Thinks he's hard6) Member of an Irish battlefield simulation club

Sure looks like a possible to me. Has anyone seen this man mooching round Santa Cruz recently? Well sure looks that way, as this photo from his Bebo album has him placed in the eastern Bolivia area 116 days ago.

The foreign terrorists in Latin America are… Irish?
Although right-wing terrorism, and the denial that it exists, are semi-hot topics in the United States, it’s a much more serious reality in Latin America than theoretical MOOSLEM TERRORISTS.

Hungarians involved in plot against Bolivian president, local news agency says

“Budapest/Santa Cruz, Bolivia, April 17 (MTI) - Bolivian police shot dead three men and arrested two others in a crackdown on what they called a "terrorist gang" which had allegedly been preparing a plot against Bolivian President Evo Morales. According to local reports, the gang included some Hungarian members as well.

The Bolivian El Deber news agency reported on its website that police had encircled the group in Hotel Las Americas in Santa Cruz in the early hours of Thursday, killing Eduardo Rozsa Flores, Arpad Magyarosi ands Michael Martin Dwyer, and arresting Mario Tadic and Elod Toaso. Police said that Magyarosi and Toaso were Hungarian nationals, Rozsa and Tadic Croatian, and Dwyer Irish. Bolivian Vice-President Alvaro Garcia Linera branded the group as championing a "far-right fascist ideology" and blamed them for former bomb attacks on the house of a minister and a cardinal. The vice-president claimed that they were plotting to kill President Morales.”

Via Inca Kola News comes a report of an attempted assassination attempt on Bolivian President Evo Morales. Bina, at News of the Restless translated several reports from Bolivia’s ABI which fill in more information. From what is known, it appears there was a terrorist cell — including Europeans (some reports say Hungarians, others Romanians, and still others Croatians)– operating in Santa Cruz, where the U.S. Embassy was unwisely supporting what appeared to be a fascist group seeking to foment an secessionist movement in the region. Whether these were hired guns or an organized terrorist group isn’t clear yet. Santa Cruz secession was largely funded and led by Bolivians of Croatian and East European extraction, who may still have ties to the “old country”.

To add confusion to what we know, a few days ago, someone tried to blow up the Cardinal of Santa Cruz’ home (His Eminence was unharmed, but the poor guy is recovering from heart surgery and didn’t need the excitement). The Cardinal is not a supporter of Evo Morales, but of his opponents. This group was supposedly responsible for the attack on the Cardinal’s home.

Predictably — the far-right in Santa Cruz is trying to suggest that the terrorist reports were phony, though Bolivian officials showed the explosives, weapons and dead Irishman, and other foreigners and a Bolivian. Others of various nationalities are said to be in custody.

The Irishman, now ready to be planed under the old sod is named Michael Dwyer. I thought right-wing militias were a U.S. thing, but apparently not. The Irish Times is reporting that Ireland’s Foreign Ministry is investigating, but does not identify Dwyer. Dwyer’s website which includes several photos on him in Bolivia, lists friends and associates in various Irish paramilitary “clubs” that may be of interest to the Foreign Ministry and international law enforcement people.

Infamous foreigners killed in Bolivia’s past: Butch Cassidy (Leroy Robert Parker) and the Sundance Kid 1908, and Communist Revolutionary Ernesto Che Guevara who was captured and executed in 1967.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Don’t Tread on Me Part II; Civil Libertarians under Fire Once again, Janet Napolitano Using the Janet Reno Playbook to go After Civil Libertarians:

Don’t Tread on Me Part II; Civil Libertarians under Fire Once again, Janet Napolitano Using the Janet Reno Playbook to go After Civil Libertarians:
By Marc Chamot

”Paranoia Schizophrenia is the real definition for the Janet Napolitano, and some of the current Liberal crops of Democrats in Washington, and for former AG Janet Reno’s mental complexes, “paranoia Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, and disabling mental illness. It affects men and women with equal frequency. People suffering from schizophrenia may have the following symptoms:

Delusions, false personal beliefs held with conviction in spite of reason or evidence to the contrary, not explained by that person's cultural context.

Hallucinations, perceptions (can be sound, sight, touch, smell, or taste) that occur in the absence of an actual external stimulus (Auditory hallucinations, those of voice or other sounds, are the most common type of hallucinations in schizophrenia.)

Disorganized thoughts and behaviors and disorganized speech.

Catatonic behavior, in which the affected person's body may be rigid and the person may be unresponsive”

American Civil Libertarians far outnumber the left-wing and right-wing groups according to a 2000 poll, 32% of American voters are centrists; 16% are libertarians; 14% are authoritarians; 13% liberal; 7% are conservative. We are kind of getting sick and tired of watching the other two minority groups, in wanting to dominate American politics and trample over our constitution, even though most Civil Libertarians usually lean conservative.

Are Washington Liberal Democrats becoming very nervous? A unified conservative and Civil Libertarians could become a 23% political power house again. That alliance hasn’t happened since the Bill Clinton and Janet Reno years of 1993.

I am absolutely sure of it, Washington Liberals aren’t just scared for the American people, the you and me crowds, the usual run-in-the-mill Civil Libertarians like us, they are more scared about this alliance and for their political hides, their futures, their demise for their left-wing political agendas, and they are reaching for ways that they can stamp out true opposition to their preconceived ideals. And they also want to keep their Federalism over state rights dream alive, no matter how wrong they are.

If any one has been following my blogs for the past two years, I have been bringing up these issues. I had predicted that there would be fear coming from our Washington politicians sooner or later and attacks against Civil Libertarians and conservatives would be resuming again.

Former President Bill Clinton's "Pit Bull" and point person, AG Janet Reno was used to go after Civil Libertarians in 1993.

If they haven’t learned their lessons from the FAILED Bill Clinton, and Janet Reno era when they took on Civil Libertarians, they’re doomed to repeat this mistake again.

Janet Napolitano said "Let me be clear: we monitor the risks of violent extremism taking root here in the United States," Napolitano said in a statement. "We don't have the luxury of focusing our efforts on one group; we must protect the country from terrorism whether foreign or homegrown, and regardless of the ideology that motivates its violence."

"Let me remind Miss Janet Napolitano that we the American people made the American government, we the American people put you in your position, we the American people pay your salaries and WE expect you to abide and carry the writs of our constitution, we the American people are refusing to sit back and keep on watching, as our constitution and state powers are being slowly stripped and torn apart."

After having said all of this, I will give President Barack Obama a lot of credit. President Obama has found out the hard-way that pursuing his radical left-wing agendas will not work in America.

The United States is not a “banana republics,” like Venezuela, Bolivia, and Brazil where its politics can lean left one minute and then right the next minute. Most Americans are traditionally centrist and most lean a little right of center. When radical left wing changes come about, of course, there are going to be serious contrary adversary reactions.

The United States is a nation that has centuries of experience in democracy, whereas “banana republics” only have decades.

I’m seeing a lot of restrains coming from President Obama to implement many of his unpopular left-wing agendas; actually he’s doing pretty much the opposite.

The banning of Mexican truckers coming into the states, getting tough on unfair trade practices like NAFTA and the WTO’s, the buy American initiatives, I will admit that the Democrats and he, have pretty much abandoned the immigration reforms, and amnesty for illegal aliens.

These pro-amnesty and open borders groups are blasting President Obama on a daily basis to act in their favor.

Even though with new alarming reports that show we’ve got disastrous immigration problems; more than 4 million anchor babies/children of illegal aliens were born in the United States. Report: Illegal immigrants having more kids in US : “Growing numbers of children of illegal immigrants are being born in this country, and they are nearly twice more likely to live in poverty than those with American-born parents, a report says.

The study released Tuesday by the Pew Hispanic Center highlights a growing dilemma in the immigration debate: Illegal immigrants' children born in the United States are American citizens, yet they struggle in poverty and uncertainty along with parents who fear deportation, toil largely in low-wage jobs and face layoffs in an ailing economy.

The analysis by Pew, a nonpartisan research organization, estimated that 11.9 million illegal immigrants lived in the U.S. Of those, 8.3 million were in the labor force as of March 2008, making up 5.4 percent of the U.S. work force, primarily in lower-paying farming, construction or janitorial work.

Roughly three out of four of their children _ or 4 million _ were born in the U.S. In 2003, 2.7 million children of illegal immigrants, or 63 percent, were born in this country.

Overall, illegal immigrants' children account for one of every 15 students in kindergarten through 12th grade.

Illegal immigrants also have become more geographically dispersed, increasingly passing up typical destinations like California in favor of jobs in newly emerging Hispanic areas in Southeastern states like Georgia and North Carolina.

In 2008, California had the most illegal immigrants at 2.7 million, double its 1990 number, followed by Texas, Florida, New York and New Jersey. Still, California's 22 percent share of the nation's illegal immigrant population was a marked drop-off from its 42 percent share in 1990.”

And we’ve still got a big problem with H1B and H2B visas, right when news reports have come out that we’ve got hundred and thousands of new college graduates coming out of college, most with no job prospects, and our government is still pandering to foreign prospects and keep importing cheaper foreign workers. This is absolutely absurd! Ineptness like this is what drives most Americans nuts.

We’ve still got many areas economically depressed such as: Fed: Economic picture bleak in St. Louis district “Overall economic activity over the past two months in the Federal Reserve Bank’s St. Louis District, which includes Louisville, “weakened further” as manufacturers and service sector businesses reported slowing activity.

The St. Louis District also includes Memphis, Tenn., and Little Rock, Ark.

Economic activity in the district closely tracked the entire nation, the Federal Reserve Bank reported in the latest edition of its monthly Beige Book report of current economic conditions, which was released Wednesday.”

And I truly believe now that President Barack Obama is very sincere in trying to address the economic situation, Obama addresses economy, tax plan on filing day
“President Obama touted his tax cut Wednesday as an important component of his plan to right the U.S. economy and put working families on a more prosperous path.

"My administration has taken far-reaching action to give tax cuts to the Americans who need them while jump-starting growth and job creation in the process," Obama said. "We start from the simple premise that we should reduce the tax burden on working people, while helping Americans go to college, own a home, raise a family, start a business and save for retirement. Those goals are the foundation of the American Dream, and they are the focus of my tax policy."

Appearing with the president on the national tax filing deadline were families affected by the economic downturn.

"Across America, families like the folks who have joined me here today have had tough choices forced upon them," Obama said. "Many have lost a job or are fighting to keep their business open. Many more are struggling to make payments, to stay in their home or to pursue a college education.

"These Americans are the backbone of our economy, the backbone of our middle class. ... They need a government that is working to create jobs and opportunity for them, rather than simply giving more and more to those at the very top in the false hope that wealth automatically trickles down."

All of these have been my pet issues on my blogs, and it seems that President Obama and the Democrats have pretty much satisfied some of my views and that they are trying to appease Civil Libertarians like me. But obviously they don’t like it. We are an intrusion to their left-wing agendas and goals, and what they do between now and the midterms, will determine if the Democrats will keep their majority in the U.S. congress.

So, I think that Janet Napolitano and Liberal Democrats may be overreacting a little here, and I think that if they simply take care of Americans, us, like they are supposed to, and like they are being PAID TO, and maybe just for once, Civil Libertarians might lighten-up a bit?

Chorus of Protest Grows Over Report Warning of Right Wing Radicalization:
“The government considers you a terrorist threat if you oppose abortion, own a gun or are a returning war veteran."

That's what House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said Wednesday in response to a Department of Homeland Security report warning of the rise of right-wing extremist groups.

Smith, who said the report on "right-wing extremism" amounts to "political profiling," said that DHS is "using people's political views to assess an individual's susceptibility to terror recruitment." He joins a growing chorus of protest from irate conservative groups that are protesting the report's findings.

The report, titled "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment," released last week by DHS' Office of Intelligence and Analysis, said while there is no specific information that domestic right-wing terrorists are planning acts of violence, it suggests acts of violence could come from unnamed "rightwing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, abortion, increasing federal power and restrictions on firearms -- and it singles out returning war veterans as susceptible to recruitment.

A senior Republican Judiciary Committee aide tells FOX News that the Obama administration "should immediately retract the report and apologize," saying that according to the report, pro-lifers, anyone who lost their jobs or are one of the thousands of military veterans who have fought to prevent another 9/11 could be suspect.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano defended the report Wednesday, saying it is part of an ongoing series of assessments to provide information to state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies on "violent radicalization" in the United States.

But the references to military veterans in the recent report angered conservatives.
"The department is engaging in political and ideological profiling of people who fought to keep our country safe from terrorism, uphold our nation's immigration laws, and protect our constitutional right to keep and bear arms," said Rep. Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla.,
Texas Rep. Lamar Smith accused the department of painting "law-abiding Americans, including war veterans, as 'extremists.'"

Indiana Rep. Steve Buyer, the ranking Republican on the House Veterans' Affairs committee, said it was "inconceivable" that the administration would consider military veterans a potential terrorist threat.

On the Net:
Homeland Security Department: http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm&usg=AFQjCNERcaUQA7Q6gJkw6aSitosYpNlZSw

Recent Comments

FAIR USE POLICY:

Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted materials, with use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

I am making these materials available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc.

I am also using such materials to rebut and dispute arguments, when they ARE not based on FACTS.

I'm here to offer my own argument, opinions and judgments on the subject matters, which MAY interfere with my constitutional rights, towards receiving, fair political representations from my federal, state and local representatives.

I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes.

When I post photos, I may have inadvertently posted one without prior knowledge of actual ownerships.

If you feel I may have violated some of YOUR copyright of some sorts, you HAVE the right to email or post a comment, requesting my removal of such material(s), such as photos and full postings of articles, however I reserve the right to keep the main idea, snippets of your article on my blog, protected under the FAIR USE ACT.




"There are two major developments, she says, that are new this year and insufficiently noted, but they're going to shape election outcomes in 2010 and beyond. First, Washington is being revealed in a new way.

The American people now know, "with real sophistication," everything that happens in the capital. "I find a much more knowledgeable electorate, and it is a real-time response," Ms. Blackburn says. "We hear about it even as the vote is taking place."

Voters come to rallies carrying research—"things they pulled off the Internet, forwarded emails," copies of bills, roll-call votes. The Internet isn't just a tool for organization and fund-raising. It has given citizens access to information they never had before. "The more they know," Ms. Blackburn observes, "the less they like Washington."-Tennessee Representative Marsha Blackburn


Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population; by creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization; satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation; augmenting primitive feelings of envy; rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56494

The Obama Deception

MIA: Still No Border Security From Hapless Obama & U.S. Congress; SINCE

This BLOG Supports CANDIDATES that think for Americans FIRST. You, the candidate will get posted here and get my VOTE; only if you take care of our porous border, RID America of Criminal Illegal Aliens, No Amnesty, and Keeping American Jobs in America and improving our diminishing wages. Reducing our trade deficit with China and helping our dwindling economy and our middle class.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...