Mike Huckabee’s 2012 Republican Presidential Nomination in Jeopardy over FOUR Parkland, Washington Police Murders;

Mike Huckabee’s 2012 Republican Presidential Nomination in Jeopardy over FOUR Parkland, Washington Police Murders; Cop Killer had Lengthy Arkansas Violent Sentences Commuted by Former Governor:
By Marc Chamot

Clemencies for criminals were BEING done, just to PANDER for the Arkansas "black" VOTES:

There’s one thing that I can’t stand, is a politician who takes a weaker stand on crimes and criminals. Here is another high profile murders from a criminal that former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee had commuted their sentences.

“In 1989, Clemmons, then 17, was convicted in Little Rock for aggravated robbery. He was paroled in 2000 after Huckabee commuted Clemmons' 95-year prison sentence. Huckabee, who was criticized during his run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008 for granting many clemencies and commutations, cited Clemmons' youth. Clemmons later violated his parole, was returned to prison and was released in 2004.”

The Republican front runner for the 2012 Republican nomination, apparently this former Republican Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, once again will be under heavy fire, over another dangerous criminal, with extensive criminal records, who had his prison sentence commuted about ten years ago, which lead to the murders of FOUR Parkland Washington police officers.

Maurice Clemmons, a habitual and violent Arkansas criminal, once sentenced for robbery, thefts and child molestations, killed four Parkland Washington police officers, execution style, while they were all seated in a coffee shop using their laptops. News stories coming out, now are saying that Maurice Clemmons had his sentence commuted by then and former, Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee.

For a so called person, who likes to call himself a law and order Republican? No, I don’t think so; I think this man is through for presidential politics.

There’s no way in heck, I will vote for this man. And just wait till the mainstream press get a hold of this, this will become another Michael Dukakis’ Willie Horton nightmares for him during the 2012 campaigns. Not EVEN Fox News can save his HIDE from this ONE.

4 police officers slain in coffee shop attack

A man with an extensive criminal past - including a lengthy prison sentence commuted by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee nearly a decade ago - was being sought Sunday in a deadly attack on four police officers who were gunned down inside a coffee shop.

Pierce County sheriff's spokesman Ed Troyer said Maurice Clemmons, 37, was believed to have been in the area around the time of the shooting, but declined to say what evidence might link him to the attack.

Clemmons has a violent criminal history from Arkansas, including aggravated robbery and theft, the sheriff's office said. He also recently was arrested and charged in Washington state for assaulting a police officer, and second-degree rape of a child. Using a bail bondsman, he posted $150,000 and was released from jail last week.

Still unclear was why a man entered the coffee shop and gunned down Sgt. Mark Renninger, 39; and Officers Ronald Owens, 37; Tina Griswold, 40; and Greg Richards, 42.

"We have no motive at all," Troyer said. "I don't think when we find out what it is, it will be anything that makes any sense or be worth it."

The four officers were members of the police department of Lakewood, which adjoins the unincorporated area of Parkland where the shootings took place.

Troyer said investigators believe two of the officers were killed while sitting in the shop, and a third was shot dead after standing up. The fourth apparently "gave up a good fight."

"We believe there was a struggle, a commotion, a fight ... that he fought the guy all the way out the door," Troyer said. "We hope that he hit him." Investigators were asking medical providers in the area to report any gunshot wounds.

In 1989, Clemmons, then 17, was convicted in Little Rock for aggravated robbery. He was paroled in 2000 after Huckabee commuted Clemmons' 95-year prison sentence. Huckabee, who was criticized during his run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008 for granting many clemencies and commutations, cited Clemmons' youth. Clemmons later violated his parole, was returned to prison and was released in 2004.

"This is the day I've been dreading for a long time," Larry Jegley, prosecuting attorney for Arkansas' Pulaski County, told the Seattle Times when informed Clemmons was being sought for questioning in connection with the killings.

Troyer said the gunman entered the coffeehouse and walked toward the counter as if to place an order. A barista saw a gun when the man opened his jacket and fled out the back door. The man then turned and opened fire on the officers as they sat working on their laptops.
Troyer said the attack was clearly targeted at the officers, not a robbery gone bad.

"This was more of an execution. Walk in with the specific mind-set to shoot police officers," he said. "There were marked patrol cars outside, and they were all in uniform."

Troyer said the officers were catching up on paperwork at the beginning of their shifts when they were attacked at 8:15 a.m.

The coffee shop, part of a popular local chain, is on a side street near McChord Air Force Base in Tacoma, about 35 miles south of Seattle.

The truths what ails us; Massive Trade Imbalances, Trillion Dollars Foreign Debts, China & Failed “Reaganomics:”

The truths what ails us; Massive Trade Imbalances, Trillion Dollars Foreign Debts, China & Failed “Reaganomics:”
Special Report By Marc Chamot

Years of Washington’s mismanagements’ and incompetences' has brought about a steady economic demise for this country. For years, economists around warned that if we kept up with massive trade imbalances, and mounting foreign debts, and sending our wealth abroad, it would some day doom this country. And it has.

I find it quite amazing when conservative Republicans talk about former President Ronald Reagan like he was some economical genius, especially people like Shawn Hannity and Sarah Palin.

Please, don’t get me wrong. I don’t have anything against former President Ronald Reagan and Sarah Palin, but after listening to Palin’s radio interview, on the Mike Levine Show, I was pretty sure that she was carrying that same empty, know nothing, the same old worn out Republican messages in reforming and changing America’s economy, and politics from what it is. I beg to differ, and I will tell you why.

First of all on the radio show, she said that the United States did not need a third party. If the Republicans ever get their act together, a two party system was fine. With the chaos that we’re in, we got two of the lamest parties around, and while America has been going down the tubes, now this woman says we don’t need a third party.

Secondly, Palin said that the economic and the Republican’s failures have been, because they all strayed away from former President Reagan’s philosophies of fewer taxes, less government and open free markets.

You all know me, I’m no Republican or a Democrat, and I would never want to claim to be neither. So I decided to do a little research, I wanted to see who and what started this economic disasters that we're currently in. I’m talking about the Republican’s ideas of economic growths beginning from the 1980’s.

There are numerous charts, and government documentations’ that debunks the successes of Ronald Reagan’s “Reaganomics,” which at the time seemed like a great idea to help the U.S. out of a large deficit, but unfortunately these trade offs, for less taxes, less government, more free markets, and open free foreign trades, unfortunately led to the collapse of our very own foreign trades EXPORTS, and led to our current state of massive foreign debts, and the collapse of American manufacturing jobs. We also banked on, and borrowed against our futures in GDP growths and we lost.

That’s what “Reaganomics” was all about. It was a strategy to get America out of a deficit from the seventies, it should have been a temporary solution, but instead the Republican Party and their conservatives decided they would use this strategy indefinitely, as their political platforms on economics for America.

For starters, our trade imbalances began to plummet soon after President Ronald Reagan took office in 1980, and prior to that we had more of an equal and balanced trade with foreign nations. See Charts:
Scale-tipping growth spurt for U.S. trade deficit“Between 1960 and 1980 the U.S. economy maintained, on average, roughly balanced trade with the world's other economies. In the 1960s, the United States ran a small trade surplus of $32 billion, or about $3.2 billion per year. In the 1970s, the U.S. had a small deficit on goods and services trade of $82 billion, or $8.2 billion per year.

But over the next 20 years, from 1981 to 2000, trade became grossly unbalanced, with the United States running an aggregate trade deficit of nearly $2,260 billion since 1980, or about $113 billion per year. Since 1997, this already large increase in the trade deficit has grown at an even faster rate, jumping nearly one percentage point of gross domestic product annually (as shown in the figure below). The trade deficit reached an all-time peak share of 3.7% of GDP in the third quarter of 2000, far surpassing the previous record set in 1987.”

As our TRADE exports began to collapse, we began to BORROW more money from foreign countries. Charts also show that foreign debt shot up when President Ronald Reagan first took office and it hasn’t stopped since then. Even after three Republican presidencies and one former Democrat, and with the CURRENT Democratic president, national debt and foreign imports skyrocketed under their watches. Our own trade efforts were being dismantled while allowing foreign importers to flood our markets with their products. As we were losing our consumer markets to foreign importers, our money and wealth was slowly escaping abroad, where most of the money is abroad, and there aren’t any to sustain our own economy and JOBS here at home.

Our economy never became a serious problem, until China got into the loop, when George Bush allowed them into the WTO 2001; it became an economic free-fall, and a disaster for the United States.

When China began to put restrictions on our exports to their country, and when they began to subsidize all of their exports to ours, so to make it cheaper for American consumers, all hell broke lose, and our economy is in shambles. The Chinese subsidizing of their own manufacturing businesses, it made purchases and productions for American made products costly and difficult to afford. Without that money, our very own industrial productions began to collapse (see chart). All of these scenarios are being shown in charts.

China trade deficit threat to U.S., others“China continues to have the largest bilateral trade deficit with the U.S. of any country in the world. It also has the most imbalanced trade relationship. The U.S. imported more than $5 worth of goods from China for every $1 worth of exports in 2001. This five-to-one ratio has been exceeded in U.S. history only by the six-to-one trade imbalance that was recorded by China in 2000.”

These charts show that while exports were declining, imports, mainly those from China were increasing and national debts were increasing, all were a perfect storm, for a big economical disaster that no president can get us out of.

When President Obama recently visited China, with his failure in getting suitable trade and other economic concessions’, it proved how far we have fallen politically with the Chinese. Obama showed that they were in command, not the US.

For the American economy to improve, it will take reversing all of these negative charts. This means tougher actions with China, and cutting national debts. Work on balancing our trades.

There aren’t any banks on earth that WOULD allow you, or I to run a business with these kinds of atrocious figures, and still a get a LOAN. This is atrocious and GROSS neglect from our politicians!

When Americans begin to learn about these incompetence’s, all politicians will be under the GUN (pressure), including President Obama to do something. Oh yes, it will happen, because regardless whether Obama, Democrats, or Republicans DON'T want to take on China, they will be voted out of office for lack of JOB creations.

For the people, it means looking and voting for candidates who run on cutting national debts and balancing the trade deficits. It also means for people to stop buying Chinese imports, if you keep on doing it, then don’t gripe about the state of the economy and losing your JOB.

Former Presidents George Bush and this current president both have said, at a time like this, we must all sacrifice. I say to these two, the hell I am? I’m NOT willing to sacrifice my country, or to LET China become number one, while I live in squalor, because of Washington’s decades of mismanagement and for THEIR incompetence’s.

Did the 31 Sanctuary Cities & their Policies; Protections of Criminal Illegal Aliens & Gangs, Seriously Distort the Current FBI Hate Crimes Reports?

Did the 31 Sanctuary Cities & their Policies; Protections of Criminal Illegal Aliens & their Gangs, Seriously Distort the Current FBI Hate Crimes Reports?
By Marc Chamot

In August 4th, 2007 in Newark New Jersey, three illegal aliens, including one Peruvian, gunned down three young black college students and raped two. See: Suspect Pleads Not Guilty in New Jersey Students' Execution-Style Deaths
“NEWARK, N.J. — A Peruvian national in the U.S. illegally and who was previously charged with raping a 5-year-old girl pleaded not guilty Friday in the execution-style slayings of three young college students, a day after he surrendered to the Newark mayor.” It then turned out they were targeted and killed, because they were black, and they didn’t mean a thing to these band of killers.

Then back around March 24th 2008, I wrote a piece about a wonderful 17 years-old black kid, with a promising football future college career, Jamiel Shaw, who was wantonly gunned down and killed by another illegal alien, an MS-13 gang member in Los Angeles. Story: An Excellent Kid, Mother Serving in Iraq; with a Promising Football Career for Jamiel Shaw; Gunned Down to Death by a Criminal Illegal Alien! “This time it was on a sweet 17 year old kid named Jamiel Shaw, a star high school football player with preparations to play for some top colleges in the nation. A freakin’ “ese”, Pedro Espinoza gunned him down by his home. He just pulled up to Jamiel Shaw who was standing around by his home, minding his own business and asked him “where you from? And then shot him dead." It also turned out that Jamiel Shaw was killed because he was black.

These are some examples of hate crimes being perpetrated on black Americans, by Latino thugs, and gang members. Then there were the VHG Gang-Racist Latino Gang Taken Down in Hawaiian Gardens California; Involved in “Ethnic Cleansing” of Blacks from the City, Drugs and Murder: “A Latino street gang made up of both, undocumented and ABL’s (American Born Latinos,) most born from illegal alien parents, waged a racist campaign that included murder of a deputy sheriff, attempted murders, and other violent crimes against the city’s black residents, while flooding the area with guns and drugs, according to federal racketeering indictments unsealed last Thursday.” But the problem is much deeper than that.

In my last posting, 2009 FBI Hate Crimes Report; covers-up Facts that Criminal Latino Gangs' Been Perpetrating More Hate Crimes against Black Americans: I blasted the FBI yesterday, for coming out with an erroneous hate crimes report. It showed white and black Americans as perpetrators’ of hate crimes, but conveniently left out Hispanic thugs, who are terrorizing and killing African Americans.

News reports are abundant recently on such instances’ where Latino gangs have been assaulting, robbing and killing black Americans. And then last night, I had an "epiphany," maybe, and just maybe it wasn’t entirely the FBI’s faults at all, for these erroneous figures on hate crimes.

I did a little DIGGING, in checking out the facts; those two cities where these Latino on black hate crimes, and murders occurred were actually sanctuary cities. Then I dug a little further, I wanted to see who the sanctuary cities in America were? Then wholly and behold! There are 31 sanctuary cities in the United States, and they all are predominantly the BIGGEST and largest cities in America.

According to my ever trusted Wikipedia the sanctuary cities are; Washington, D.C.; New York City; Los Angeles; Chicago; San Francisco; Santa Ana; San Diego; Salt Lake City; Phoenix; Dallas; Houston; Austin; Detroit; Jersey City; Minneapolis; Miami; Denver; Baltimore; Seattle; Portland, Oregon; New Haven, Connecticut; and Portland, Maine.

These cities have adopted "sanctuary" ordinances banning city employees and police officers from asking people about their immigration status, including turning OVER youths to ICE. Then it hit me like a ton of bricks! Of course, the FBI aren’t about to GET the whole picture about REAL crimes being perpetrated on Americans, by criminal illegal aliens from these cities.

We’re talking about the top 15 metropolitan areas of the United States, where the largest concentrations of African Americans live, among Hispanics and gangs, and they all fall under sanctuary cities.

Then our federal governments aren’t getting the true PICTURES on crimes being perpetrated by illegal aliens in those sanctuary cities. It’s distorting the federal governments’ crime statistics big time. Take San Francisco for example, it is one of the cities’ that have kept files on criminal illegal aliens from the federal government for years. It’s not known how many others are following suit.

This is absolutely outrageous and unacceptable, it’s subverting our LAWS, and it’s a serious breach of American security; and a serious VIOLATION of federal laws. Sanctuary cities ARE illegal, former President George Bush did not do anything about them, and possibly President Obama isn’t either.

This is a serious violation of our constitution, it’s allowing one group to be protected from criminality LAWS, while others are being punished for the same crimes, and it’s a VIOLATION of equal and due process of laws in this country.

I knew when I first set eyes on yesterday’s FBI’s Hate Crimes Report, something was missing from these reports, having followed the news for these past years, I saw that something wasn’t quite right, and without a doubt, these stats were missing from the FBI’s 2009 Hate Crimes Report.

2009 FBI Hate Crimes Report; Covers-up Facts that Criminal Latino Gangs' Been Perpetrating More Hate Crimes against Black Americans:

2009 FBI Hate Crimes Report; 61.1% Perps of Hate Crimes are Whites; Covers-up Facts that Criminal Latino Gangs' Been Perpetrating More Hate Crimes against Black Americans:
By Marc Chamot

I want to know why the Latino/Hispanic gangs hate crimes against African Americans were covered up by the recent 2009 FBI hate crimes reports?

Is President Obama covering up for Latino/Hispanic hate crimes against Black Americans with these new 2009 FBI hate crimes statistics, and was it for next years’ Amnesty agendas? Is this another of Obama’s government cover-ups? Just like he said the stimulus helped gain over 700,000 jobs, which turned out to be a total LIE, and now with this?

Then why, when it comes to Latinos and Hispanic hate crimes, which are being perpetrated against black Americans; this government; President Obama’s and the media are covering-up the FBI’s hate crimes reports? This is not the first time that this president and Medias have covered up negative Latino reports from the general populace.

The FBI said more than half of hate crimes that were being committed in the United States were mostly racially motivated, and were being done by white folks. Three-quarters of the victims were blacks and other victims were Latinos/Hispanics.

The FBI also says hate crimes in America have increased by 2% in 2008, to a total of 7,783 from 2007. They are also saying that 61.1 percent of the perpetrators are white, while blacks perpetrated the other 20.2 percent of these hate crimes cases.

But interesting ENOUGH folks, there are no mentions as to what percentage Latinos are the perpetrators of any hate crimes, especially against African Americans.

According to the new FBI report, Latinos/Hispanics are supposed to be real SAINTS.

They are the real jewel of our citizenry, they can do no wrong, but it is common knowledge that young criminal illegal aliens within Latino gangs, have been targeting African Americans in neighborhoods from LA to New York City, and including within the nation’s penal systems.

See Story, VHG Gang-Racist Latino Gang Taken Down in Hawaiian Gardens California; Involved in “Ethnic Cleansing” of Blacks from the City, Drugs and Murder: “A Latino street gang made up of both, undocumented and ABL’s (American Born Latinos,) most born from illegal alien parents, waged a racist campaign that included murder of a deputy sheriff, attempted murders, and other violent crimes against the city’s black residents, while flooding the area with guns and drugs, according to federal racketeering indictments unsealed last Thursday.”

But it seems that the BIASED Obama, the pro-illegal aliens and pro-amnesty president wants the FBI, the Media, and the Associated Press not to show those figures.

The Latino’s dislike and hatreds for blacks is common knowledge world-wide.

The FBI says they compiled records from 2,145 police agencies around the country who have reported on hate crimes. Hate crimes are defined as incidents being motivated by a person's race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity or disabilities.

• The number of incidents against blacks increased 8% to 2,876. Crimes against blacks made up 72% of racially motivated crimes in the USA.
• Bias incidents based on religion increased 9%, to 1,519 incidents. The majority of those, two-thirds, were anti-Jewish hate crimes.
• Hate crimes against gays went up by 3% to 1,297 incidents, while the number of people who were victims of hate-crimes based on sexual orientation went up 13%, to 1,706.

But there have been OUTCRIES from Latino communities about their current rash of hate crimes against Hispanics, members of the large US Hispanic community were victims of 64 percent, or nearly two-thirds, of the 1,148 hate crimes driven by a bias against a person's ethnicity or national origin, but this new 2009 FBI report isn’t showing any Hispanic perpetrators of HATE crimes especially those done to our black American friends.

I can tell you why Latinos/Hispanics are being protected from negative views by this government, first of all, if African Americans really KNEW what was going on with their PEOPLE, the open border’s agendas and amnesties would meet a SUDDEN death, and they know that.

So we’re being duped once again by this administration. It’s a pattern that we’re beginning to see, and it isn’t a good one. Like I said before, this president will be known as the LIAR in Chief, not the commander in chief. You just WATCH.

Here are the actual 2009 FBI charts: "There is no mention of Latino’s or Hispanics committing ANY hate crimes against black Americans or anybody else, in their current report. Look for yourselves and see."

A review of available race data reported in 2008 for the 6,927 known hate crime offenders revealed that:

By race
§ 61.1 percent were white.
§ 20.2 percent were black.
§ 5.9 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (multiple races, group).
§ 1.1 percent was Asian/Pacific Islander.
§ 0.7 percent was American Indian/Alaskan Native.
§ 11.0 percent were unknown. (Based on Table 9.)
By crime category
Crimes against persons
A total of 5,613 known hate crime offenders committed offenses that were crimes against persons in 2008. Of these offenders:
§ 37.3 percent intimidated their victims.
§ 36.7 percent committed simple assault.
§ 25.0 percent committed aggravated assault.
§ 0.5 percent murdered or raped their victims.
§ 0.4 percent committed other types of offenses, which are collected only in the UCR Program’s National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). (Based on Table 2.)
By bias motivation
An analysis of data for victims of single-bias hate crime incidents showed that:
§ 51.0 percent were victimized because of the offender’s bias against a race.
§ 17.9 percent were targeted because of a bias against a religious belief.
§ 17.6 percent were victims because of a bias against a particular sexual orientation.
§ 12.7 percent were targeted because of a bias against an ethnicity/national origin.
§ 0.9 percent were victimized because of a bias against a disability. (Based on Table 1.)
Racial bias
More than half of the single-bias hate crimes were racially motivated. Of the 4,934 victims of these racial bias crimes:
§ 72.9 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-black bias.
§ 16.8 percent were victims because of an anti-white bias.
§ 3.4 percent were targeted because of an anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
§ 1.3 percent were victims because of an anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias.
§ 5.6 percent were victims because of a bias against a group of individuals in which more than one race was represented (anti-multiple races, group). (Based on Table 1.)
Religious bias
Of the 1,732 victims of anti-religious hate crimes:
§ 66.1 percent were targeted because of an offender’s anti-Jewish bias.
§ 7.5 percent were victims because of an anti-Islamic bias.
§ 5.1 percent were victims because of an anti-Catholic bias.
§ 3.6 percent were victims because of an anti-Protestant bias.
§ 0.8 percent were targeted because of an anti-Atheist/Agnostic bias.
§ 12.8 percent were victims because of a bias against other religions (anti-other religion).
§ 4.0 percent were victims because of a bias against groups of individuals of varying religions (anti-multiple religions, group). (Based on Table 1.)
Sexual-orientation bias
Offenders targeted 1,706 victims due to a sexual-orientation bias, and of these:
§ 57.5 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-male homosexual bias.
§ 27.3 percent were victims because of an anti-homosexual bias.
§ 11.6 percent were victims because of an anti-female homosexual bias.
§ 2.0 percent were victims because of an anti-heterosexual bias.
§ 1.6 percent were victims because of an anti-bisexual bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Ethnicity/national origin bias
Hate crimes motivated by the offender’s bias toward a particular ethnicity/national origin were directed at 1,226 victims. Of these:
§ 64.6 percent were victims of an anti-Hispanic bias.
§ 35.4 percent were targeted because of a bias against other ethnicities/national origins. (Based on Table 1.)
Disability bias
Offenders targeted 85 victims of a hate crime due to a bias against a disability, and of these:
§ 57 were victims of an anti-mental disability bias.
§ 28 were victims of an anti-physical disability bias. (See Table 1.)
By crime category
Of the 9,691 victims of a hate crime, 57.2 percent were victims of crimes against persons, and 42.6 percent were victims of crimes against property. The remaining percentage were victims of crimes against society. (Based on Table 2.)
By offense type
Crimes against persons
In 2008, 5,542 victims of hate crimes were victims of crimes against persons. Regarding these victims and the crimes committed against them:
§ 7 persons were murdered, and 11 were forcibly raped.
§ 48.8 percent of the victims were intimidated.
§ 32.1 percent were victims of simple assault.
§ 18.5 percent were victims of aggravated assault.
§ Less than one percent (0.3) were victims of other types of offenses, which are collected only in the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). (Based on Table 2.)

The new statistics come less than a month after President Obama signed a bill expanding those covered by the federal law against hate crimes. Previously, the law had protected those attacked on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin.

The new law signed by Obama now covers crimes based on gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. It also removes the restriction that federal authorities can launch investigations of victims who were engaged in federally protected activities such as voting or free speech.

A Special Note to all American Jew Haters Out There: "I was very horribly surprised that hate crimes’ against my own people, the Jews, are at an all time high. At the same time, hate crimes against Muslims are in FAR lower levels. I was shocked to see those statistics, but I have one thing to say to those RACIST American Jew haters out there."

"FIRST of all, Israel is the only ally that will ever come in defense of America, if America is ever attacked by China, Russia or by whomever. Secondly, we Jews, don’t fly planes into buildings, and we DON’T strap on bombs to KILL YOU. We don’t go into an army base and scream "Allahu Akbar!" and then KILL off YOUR soldiers. We don’t condone or support Sharia law, laws that murder women, like in honor killings and so forth. So get off YOUR stupidity and ignorance and GET a REAL LIFE, YOU moronic Losers!"

Are Women New Victims of Obamacare’s-H.R. 3962 Death Panels? Expanding Public Healthcare Options by Drastically Changing Mammogram Guidelines:

Are Women New Victims of Obamacare’s-H.R. 3962 Death Panels? Expanding Public Healthcare Options by Drastically Changing Mammogram Guidelines:
By Marc Chamot

I have never seen our U.S. congress and Washington politicians, acting like Barney Fife and Bemis and Butthead combined. They keep shooting themselves in the foot, time after time with their healthcare agendas.

Even before the Democrat’s new horrid healthcare plans are passed, they arrogantly unleashed their government paid hacks, the United States Preventative Services Task Force, a group of doctors and insurance companies’ biggies, who are buying the Obamacare agendas to find ways to cut medical costs, and they targeted the frequency for breast cancer screenings to women.

It’s obvious that they are looking for ways to cut down on healthcare costs, and women became their new target. Let’s not forget that seniors were their first target, with reform ideas for Medicare and Medicaid which are still on the table.

When Sarah Palin and other conservatives mentioned about the Obamacare death panels, they were laughed at and ridiculed, but after these new mammograms guidelines, on the annual check-ups, has fueled a new angry debate whether the Democrat’s healthcare reform can be trusted.

These inept politicians just keep shooting themselves in the foot. I don’t know whether it’s by sheer arrogance, ignorance or plain stupidity, but here are these people who want Americans to accept their new healthcare proposals, and then along come the new changes and additions without warning, even before it has been voted into law by the U.S. Senate. This just keeps blowing up in their faces and they keep going with it. I have never witnessed such inept bunch of American politicians in my life.

So can we say that we are witnessing what death panels may look like under Obamacare?

Who will be the next victims for healthcare cuts, men with prostate cancer and so forth? Will they cut back on annual health check-up for most folks? This new government regulations on mammograms for breast cancer detection, is an absolute outrage.

American women are up in arms about it, whether it is part of President Obama’s new Obamacare, being pushed by his Democratic cronies, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, and if they are culpable or not, it’s their panel.

They are showing all Americans exactly what Sarah Palin and some conservatives have been saying all along, the Democrats want to cut medical costs no matter what to help finance FREE medical care, for all unionized personnel, abortions, and for LGBT sex changes, and presumably to include illegal aliens’ free medical care, at our expense, and regardless the RISKS to American lives.

Even though it’s been proven that death rates from breast cancer have declined since 2002. They know that regular mammogram check-ups have saved countless of women’s lives, mainly when check-ups were at forty and younger, but now they want to change it to fifty year olds, and every other year. This is a DEATH SENTENCE for many women.

Documentations’ have shown that many women have been detected in time for breast cancer in their forties, and now the government want them to wait until their fifties, but by then, this country will have an epidemic, with advanced cases of breast cancer all over the United States.

Breast cancer stats
"About 192,370 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 40,170 women will die of the disease in 2009, according to data from the National Cancer Institute. Government statistics estimate that 1.44 percent of women who are now 40 years old will get breast cancer over the next 10 years.

The new guidelines come from the U.S Preventive Services Task Force, a government-sponsored group that provides guidance to doctors, insurance companies and policymakers. The group determined that although mammograms were found to reduce the breast cancer death rate of women 40 to 49 years old by 15 percent, it wasn't enough to warrant starting to screen at age 40. It also found insufficient evidence for the benefits of screening after age 74.

The task force noted breast cancer deaths have declined since 1990 by 2.3 percent per year overall and by 3.3 percent for women aged 40 to 50 years, attributing that decrease to the combination of mammography with improved treatment. But the group found the potential harm - through false positives and radiation exposure - outweighed the risks.

Groups such as the American Cancer Society, the American College of Radiology and the Society of Breast Imaging immediately denounced the new guidelines.

"I think it's shocking to basically spell out in such a bold and callous way which groups of women they no longer care to find cancer in," said Dr. Linda Gordon, imaging director at the Carol Ann Read Breast Health Center at Alta Bates Summit Medical Center in Oakland and Berkeley."

That is the sad picture, we’re now seeing with these radical left-wing agenda driven politicos’ in Washington as they are. But unfortunately they erred this time. Picking on women, by far, who are the most influential, and largest voting group in America, may have been their death knell for any future progressive political ambitions.

It’s obvious that agendas are driving these bunches over voters’ concerns, and public opinions. What they are doing is sacrificing VOTES and themselves, just to pass three of Obama’s left-wing key issues, like Obamacare, global warming’s Cap and Trade, and amnesty for illegal aliens.

It’s a progressive strategy, they tried to do it under former President Bill Clinton, which failed, and they are now doing it with President Obama. If Obama fails, they may someday succeed with someone else; if the Republicans don’t get their house in order or if independents don’t begin to run for office more frequently. We’ve got a bleak future with these people on the hill, folks.

Doomed! After the Same Sex Marriages-Proposition 8 Lies & Now ACORN; Democrat Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown’s Chances for California Governor is Slim to None

Doomed! After the Same Sex Marriages-Proposition 8 Lies & Now ACORN; Democrat Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown’s Chances for California Governor is Slim to None:
By Marc Chamot

I always keep wondering what liberals put in their Kool-Aid these days. It must be potent enough to disturb their better judgments in decision makings.

And now it’s with California state Attorney General Jerry Brown, the wannabe and Democratic, not yet announced candidate for the 2010 Governor’s race for California.

From what we hear, he now wants to prosecute the undercover videotaping by conservative filmmakers at the offices of ACORN in Southern California.

He's seriously thinking of investigating the filmmakers’ for violating California’s privacy laws, and NOT so much into the pimp-daddy’s of ACORN, the videos that were showing a disguised pimp and a prostitute with ACORN officials, offering services to assist them in smuggling Mexican minors for sex trades.

But to old Jerry that isn’t the only thing stranger or bizarre about him. He talks about law and order, but he’s more like above the law and disorder.

Actually, what’s really laughable, most liberals like to portray the deportations of illegal aliens’ children as tearing the family apart. But what’s really funny about it, they like to protect, and defend accused child molesters and many California judges are from that breed.

There are never stories of condemnation from ultra left wing mediums on child rapes and murders. But when it comes to criminal illegal aliens, and their kids being split and deported, they are on it with print laden diatribes.

In fact some liberals have sprung up an organization called NAMBLA, Man Boy Love Association, this liberal organization does nothing more than push for legalization for adult and child molestations.

Sorry if I vomit when I hear those same liberal hypocritical cries, about the tearing families’ apart. It’s not okay to split up illegal aliens’ children, but it is all right to rape, molest and ruin a kids life physically and mental. That is where these liberals don’t have an ounce of credibility for people to listen to.

Jerry Brown is said to be investigating ACORN too, but an insider at AG Jerry Brown’s office told the San Francisco Chronicle that ACORN has done nothing wrong. Say what? Offering to participate and commit SEX crimes against children is NOTHING WRONG?

And this buffoon wants to be Democratic governor of California? This attorney general has problems of hypocrisy of his own; recently it was revealed that his own spokesman, Scott Gerber, an AG staff member, was secretly recording all media and journalists interviews, within the attorney general’s office. Jerry Brown refused to initiate an investigation and closed the books on the case after Gerber resigned.

The real problem with the above the law and disorder Jerry Brown, “he thinks that he and his cohorts can sidestep the laws, (or they are ABOVE the law), they are using as justification for their investigations of the ACORN conservative filmmakers, James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles,” said California Republican Party Chair, Ron Nehring.

This is not the first time that “Moonbeam, Jerry Brown got himself into a BIG negative liberal pickle in California.

During the proposition 8, the overturning of homosexual marriages initiatives in California last year, Attorney General Jerry Brown promised to defend the VOTERS’ decisions. Then he did an about face, a total 180 on what he said, he went to the California Supreme Court to derail a VOTER’S approved initiative, which HE LOST.

That may explain his uncertainty as to why he’s not throwing his political hat into the governor’s ring. This is the problem for Jerry Brown, it was the same for former governor candidate Gavin Newsom, and then he dropped out the race. They are both TAINTED, these are some figures that they need to overcome, the final tally on proposition 8: Yes: 7.0M votes, 52.2% No: 6.4M votes, 47.8%.

There is no WAY Jerry Brown can capture all those 52.2% after backstabbing the voters, and to top it all, with his hypocritical ACORN scandals? He’s DOOMED for governor.

Former Men’s Wearhouse, Richard Goldman’s Ethos Alliance; Using Internet Tools to Pressure Chevron Corp to Pay Ecuador’s 27 Billion Extortion Rackets:

Former Men’s Wearhouse, Richard Goldman’s Ethos Alliance; Using Internet Tools to Pressure Chevron Corp to Pay Ecuador’s 27 Billion Extortion Rackets:
By Marc Chamot

Note: Amazing Internet; after publishing the article this morning, Mr. Richard Goldman was kind enough to comment.

He corrected my error in naming the Men’s Warehouse to Men’s Wearhouse, which I corrected, and I appreciate his sincerity. Secondly, his and my rebuttals are under comments if anybody is interested.

Former executive of the Men’s Wearhouse, Richard E. Goldman created a non profit group called Ethos Alliance, who is this Ethos Alliance? “We are a global coalition of citizen, civic, and business leaders that acts as a platform of participation to ensure that corporations abide by their social and ethical responsibilities. We are savvy pragmatists focused on getting different organizations to work together toward a common goal. We are not an anti-business organization,” and they made Chevron Oil Corporation their first target.

Richard Goldman wants to use his newly created organization, combined with the Internet’s social networking tools, and with pro-environmentalist at liberal universities, to put undue pressure on Chevron, to settle their 27 billion dollars lawsuit, with the ever, and most corrupt leftist Ecuador.

Richard Goldman says that he was very astonished that it happened, never heard about it before, and that he was surprised that Chevron Corp wouldn’t pay for this bogus lawsuit.

Obviously, Mr. Goldman must be in the dark ages, that story had made national news, and actually there is a whole lot of support for Chevron on this. They want to use this issue to raise money for humanitarian relief projects in Ecuador over these supposed eco-disasters that were supposedly perpetrated by Chevron Corp.

But there are problems with this, Ecuador is a leftist, a Hugo Chavez style, semi-dictatorship type of government being run by Rafael Correa Delgado, and another by-product of Cuba’s Fidel Castro. It’s a very corrupt government, with corrupt judges, and fleecing American corporations for money is what they do.

The suit was first filed against Texaco who were in Ecuador from 1964 to 1982, and then when Chevron bought out Texaco in 2001, they inherited the lawsuit.

Mr. Goldman knows that he is being very stupid about this.

Being closely acquainted with the Men’s Wearhouse, how would his former boss and business partner, CEO George A. Zimmer, like it, if I were to unite my bloggers and boycott his stores, because they don’t BUY AMERICAN, they import a lot of shirts from China? They are wantonly assisting and abating in American job killings.

We all know that Rafael Correa nationalized most of Ecuador’s oil industry when he took power, and Petroecuador is also known to be operating not too environmentally friendly.

Chevron Corp has been trying to explain this, but me, having lived in third world countries before, the banana republics; I have witnessed in some of these countries that they have a total disregard, and disdain for environmental safety standards.

So we are allowing a small group of Americans to get together and participate in the fleecing and extortions of another American company through a non-profit venture, and for a socialist country’s benefits, which is TOTALLY WRONG.

I agree, the contamination needs to be cleaned up. I’m not saying that Chevron and former Texaco are innocent from it all, but 27 BILLION DOLLARS? That is the budget of about 10 American states combined for a whole year!

This is an absolute outrage, a more decent cost and Chevron should offer to clean up the mess is fairer. Especially when the nation of Ecuador, during their nationalizing the oil industries, they kept most of Chevron’s oil field equipments and so forth.

Obama/Democrat’s Agendas & Policies Unacceptable to Independents; New Poll: Republicans Lead in 2010 Midterms & 58% Voters Don’t Trust Democrat’s

Obama/Democrat’s Agendas & Policies Unacceptable to Independents; New Poll: Republicans Lead in 2010 Midterms & 58% Voters Don’t Trust or Want Democrat’s Version of Healthcare:
By Marc Chamot

While the federal deficit is still growing, it has just hit a record of $1.42 trillion. The higher it goes; it could push up interests and further drag down a fragile economy. But that doesn’t convince President Obama and the Democrats about persisting on a healthcare debacle that will add another 1.2 trillion more dollars unto our large deficit.

But the bottom lines neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have any idea, or a plan on how to get the massive unemployed back to work. Democrats are screaming for more stimuli’s, while Republicans are yelling for lower taxes and MORE globalization and foreign trades. Nobody is talking about saving American industries, or making foreign trade fairer for Americans.

What I am seeing are Republicans capitalizing on Obama, and Democrats’ misfortunes in being unable to handle the economic crisis. I can still remember talk radio show host, Rush Limbaugh’s comments, “I hope that President Obama’s policies fail.” Actually Rush was right, because if they do fail, the Republicans are the alternative benefactors to the Obama and Democratic failures, right?

So Republicans are basically setting themselves up, where they don’t have to come up with alternatives ideas, strategies and plans on their own, to help solve our economical problems, because they will be the automatic benefactors of the anti-Obama and left-wing liberals failed agendas. And that what’s happening with Independents and Obama at this very moment.

Independents are moving towards Republicans in waves, without getting any concessions’ and assurances that they are not going to repeat those 12 miserable years, when they had total control of the U.S. house and the senate.

We all know that Democratic agendas will be horrendous to our deficit, and jobs creations. It’s a proven fact that very restrictive environmental regulations kill jobs, rather than helping create them. California is a prime example, where left-wing environmentalists have killed the state of productivity, and dried up its tax base.

Us, Americans and Independents counted on Democrats to run government free of agendas and pandering to their left-wing minorities of their party, but unfortunately it’s been a feeding frenzy for that little selective group, where a vast majority of Americans are being left out from opportunities, because they are simply just being ignored.

So now, new poll numbers show Democrats could be in more trouble during the 2010 midterm elections.

The new Gallup Survey, revealed for the first time since the 2008 elections, more voters say they’d prefer a Republican candidate over a Democrat in the next election. Republicans took 48 percent of the voters, while Democrats took 44 percent. But the independent VOTERS went to the GOP by a 22 percent margin. Part of the problem that is fueling this dissent, is the Democrat’s arrogance, they still insist on pushing healthcare plans that 58% of Americans don’t support nor trust it. 38 percent said that they would tell their congressman to vote against the plan, while only 29% said they would. 44 percent independents would tell their congressman not to support the plan to only 22% who would.

While Democrats continue to offer tone deaf policies, some governor’s races and senate races coming up, in predominant Democratic areas have Republican candidates in the lead, such as Republican Rob Portman of Ohio, he leads the Democratic front runner Lt. Governor Lee Fisher, 39 percent to 36 percent. It’s his first lead for Portman, because Obama’s popularity in that state is falling faster than meteors. President Obama’s job approval is 40%, down from 53% in September, and Obama won the state for the U.S. Presidency.

So evidently the Democrats are still living in denials, they still haven’t woken up from the New Jersey and Virginia governors races thrashings, and it’s unlikely they will until Republicans regain their control of the U.S. senate and house, and then it will be up to them if they can keep it long enough.

Next Posting issue will be on U.S. senate and congress’ TERM LIMITS! Yes folks, talk of term limits are back and let’s go for it! See you then.

The Marc Chamot Report Wins Best Blog Awards Again:

The Marc Chamot Report Wins Best Blog Awards Again:
By Marc Chamot

It was a wonderful surprise to me, when I opened up my blogger comments yesterday morning, and found two wonderful messages there, just waiting for me read. It stated that I have been chosen for 2 blog awards, from two popular bloggers on the Net.

Those two wonderful bloggers and awarders are not unknown to me, because they are among the sweetest and kindest blogging friends that I have on the Net.

This is the second award that my friends at Politicus.us, has awarded me. I was also given the same award by wonderful bloggers at AskCherlock.com. They both have great insights on politics that I don’t have, and they are both well worth to read.

What’s truly amazing about the wonderful folks at Politicus and AskCherlock, is that they have a little different political spectrums than mine.

They are both a little to the left of my political writings, but they aren’t left-left liberals, they are more center-moderates, and they are real proud Americans. And there’s nobody who supports freedom of speech in blogging than those two. And believe me, they are more open-minded than I am, and that is how great they are.

It just shows you folks, that there can be civility in blogging, my friends at Politicus and AskCherlock, may not agree with everything I post, but they, as most people, do enjoy the hard work, the research and fact contents that I put on every posting on my blogs.

I want to give my utmost gratitude to Politicus and AskCherlock, and thank them so much for the awards, and for the wonderful job and hard work that they’re doing at their own sites.

I also want to thank my wonderful readers and those bloggers who took the time to leave kind comments, and blog recommendations on linkreferrals.com and to those many others.

As part of the program to accepting this award, I am being asked to recommend my own awards to other bloggers. I would go as far and say, that all of my favorites are linked under blog buddies, and I’d rather keep it that way if possible.

If anybody, and those who truly enjoy my blogs, link me to your bloggroll, let me know, and I will link you right up. Thank you.

H.R. 3962/Obamacare is Dead Issue; Won't Pass Senate without Joe Lieberman & Blue Dog Democrats; Lieberman Says: Army Ignored Islamic Terror Signs

House Votes Showing; H.R. 3962/Obamacare is Dead Issue; Won't Pass Senate without Joe Lieberman & Blue Dog Democrats; Lieberman Says: Army Ignored Islamic Terror Warning Signs over Fort Hood Killings
By Marc Chamot

There’s one U.S. senator I really admire very much. He’s neither Democrat nor Republican; he’s a former Democrat who was backstabbed by his party, and then became an Independent, named Joseph Lieberman.

Ever since then, Old Joe had pretty much gotten his head screwed on right. I would say that Mr. Lieberman is one of my favorite senators in the U.S. senate. Even though I don’t agree and support some of his issues, but lately he’s been there for our country.

A once very liberal Democratic senator from Connecticut, and learned pretty much how politics is played in the U.S. senate, he’s more for the people rather than partisan oriented politics and he has won the admiration of many folks around, including this blogger.

While being a happy Democrat, along came his re-election to the U.S. senate seat that was coming up, but liberal Democrats were unhappy by Joe Lieberman’s constant pro-Israeli and anti-terror/pro-war stances that they decided to get rid of him. So they packaged another Democrat to run against him, who ended up winning the primary.
Wikipedia: “Lieberman sought the Democratic Party's re-nomination for U.S. Senate from Connecticut in 2006 but lost to Ned Lamont, a Greenwich businessman and antiwar candidate.

Lieberman was officially endorsed by the Connecticut Democratic Convention, which met in May. However, Lamont received 33 percent of the delegates' votes, forcing an August primary.

In July, Lieberman announced that he would file papers to appear on the November ballot should he lose the primary, stating, "I'm a loyal Democrat, but I have loyalties that are greater than those to my party, and that's my loyalty to my state and my country."[119] He stated that he would continue to sit as a Democrat in the Senate even if he was defeated in the primary and elected on an unaffiliated line, and expressed concern for a potentially low turnout.[120] On July 10, the Lieberman campaign officially filed paperwork allowing him to collect signatures for the newly formed Connecticut for Lieberman party ballot line.[121]

On August 8, 2006, Lieberman conceded the Democratic primary election to Ned Lamont, saying, "For the sake of our state, our country and my party, I cannot and will not let that result stand," and announced he would run in the 2006 November election as an independent candidate on the Connecticut for Lieberman ticket, against both Lamont and the Republican candidate, Alan Schlesinger.[122]”

Joe Lieberman doesn’t owe the Democratic Party anything, he’s his own man, and he supports issues that he sees fit. He owes no allegiances to President Obama and the Democrats, one of the reasons he did not support then candidate Obama for the U.S. presidency, was his fear for what would happen to Israel with an Obama presidency.

Mr. Lieberman prevailed over these Democrat’s back-stabbings, and pretty much is changing the course of what the U.S. senate is today. Mr. Lieberman epitomizes what a politician should be.

There is nobody more bi-partisan than Mr. Joseph Lieberman. Everybody raves about very partisan, former Senator Teddy Kennedy and what he did for Democrat liberals, but in my opinion, Kennedy couldn’t hold a candle, or a toilet seat to Mr. Joseph Lieberman.

While most Democrats don’t want to appear on Fox News, to Joe it’s no brainer, it’s the place to be at this moment.

Joe Lieberman has now taken the leadership roles on two crucial issues that are facing the United Sates at this moment. The last weeks’ Islamic terrorist shootings, by a U.S. military Moslem officer, Nidal Malik Hasan at Fort Hood, Have Radical Muslim Extremists Infiltrated Our Military? It Was an Act of Terrorism; Fort Hood Killer, Palestinian/American-Major Nidal Malik Hasan was a Muslim Terrorist: and the ill advised healthcare reform bill that the U.S. congress just paced. A Nancy Pelosi & Obamacare Reform Nightmares! H.R. 3962, Hello Socialism and Goodbye Free Markets; Provides Automatic FREE Healthcare for Newborns of Illegal Immigrants & Exempting Undocumented Immigrants from Massive Fines:

Sen. Joe Lieberman called the Fort Hood massacre an act of "Islamist extremism," he is the first and only Washington politician to admit and call it as he sees it. He is calling for a senate probe into the shootings, he wants to go even further, he wants to know why the army ignored all of the warnings that were behind the killer’s love for extremist’s Islamic views, and his hatred for America and the U.S. military. Hasan has been known to say, “Islamic laws come first before the U.S. constitution.” Hasan’s classmates had complained to the top brasses about it, they didn’t do anything until it led to the murders of our 13 servicemen at Fort Hood.

At this moment there are even more disturbing news about Hasan, he’s also being linked to radical mosques, and Imams who took part in the 2001 terrorists attack on the World Trade Centers, and Mr. Lieberman was right when he said, “If Hasan was showing signs, saying to people that he had become an Islamic extremist, the U.S. Army should have ZERO TOLERANCE.” There’s going to be a whole lot of army and intelligence questionings being asked behind this tragedy, it may be the end for people to fear about being called RACISTS when they suspect something from some of these Islamic slimes.

And now after the Nancy Pelosi healthcare bill which went through the house, Joe Lieberman adamantly said he will not support it, and he will not support any costly “public options.” So if these Democrats, yes, the ones that backstabbed Joe Lieberman three years ago, think that they are going to get to use him every time they want, they got something else coming, because Joe Lieberman is his own man, he’s not a sold out hack for Democrats nor for the Republican parties.

Did the more conservative and moderate Blue Dogs Democrats finally get the message from the PEOPLE? Here are Democrats who did NOT VOTE for the H.R. 3962.

This is the one lone Republican who voted for Nancy Pelosi’s Obamacare bill; Joseph Cao, a freshman Representative from Louisiana's District 2. Mr. Cao voted in favor of the bill.

Here are the 39 H.R.3962 Democratic heroes!
Some of these are the 24 proud fiscal conservatives “Blue Dog” Democrats in the house, defied Nancy Pelosi’s Obamacare agendas and voted against H.R. 3962. It looks like the Blue Dog Democrats did get the people’s message! 2010!

The Democrats were more widely divided with 219 voting for the bill and 39 voting against it. The 39 who voted against it are as follows: John Adler (New Jersey Dist 3) Jason Altmire (Pennsylvania Dist 4) Brian Baird (Washington Dist 3) John Barrow (Georgia Dist 12) John Boccieri (Ohio Dist 16) Dan Boren (Oklahoma dist 2) Rick Boucher (Virginia Dist 9) Allen Boyd (Florida Dist 2) Bobby Bright (Alabama Dist 2) Ben Chandler (Kentucky Dist 6) Travis Childers (Mississippi Dist 1) Lincoln Davis (Tennessee Dist 4) ) Artur Davis (Alabama Dist 7) Chet Edwards (Texas Dist 17)) Bart Gordon (Tennessee Dist 6) Parker Griffith (Alabama Dist 5) Stephanie Sandlin (South Dakota) Tim Holden (Pennsylvania Dist 17) Larry Kissell (N. Carolina Dist 8) Suzanne Kosmas (Florida Dist 24) Betsy Markey (Colorado Dist 4) Jim Marshall (Georgia Dist 4) Frank Kratovil (Maryland Dist 1) Dennis Kucinich (Ohio Dist 10) Eric Massa (New York Dist 29) Jim Matheson (Utah Dist 2) Mike McIntyre (N. Carolina Dist 7) Michael McMahon (New York Dist 13) Charles Melancon (Louisiana Dist 3) Walt Minnick (Idaho Dist 1) Scott Murphy (New York Dist 20) Glenn Nye (Virginia Dist 2) Collin Peterson (Minnesota Dist 7) Mike Ross (Arkansas Dist 4) Heath Shuler (N. Carolina Dist 11) Ike Skelton (Missouri Dist 4) John Tanner (Tennessee Dist 8) Gene Taylor (Mississippi Dist 4) Harry Teague (New Mexico Dist 2)

And after the house, now we know that the Senate Blue Dog Democrats won’t vote for it either, along with Senator Joe Lieberman an Independent, Obamacare is a DOA issue now. As I said before, folks, if President Obama cannot get the House and Senate Blue Dog votes for his far left-wing issues, his policies and agendas will not get through, and thank goodness for that! Let’s be prepared for the next rounds of Obama defeats, global warming policies, Cap and Trade, and then early next year, Amnesty.

Pelosi & Obamacare's H.R. 3962 Nightmares! Provides Automatic FREE Healthcare for Newborns of Illegal Immigrants & Exempting Them from Massive Fines:

A Nancy Pelosi & Obamacare Reform Nightmares! H.R. 3962, Hello Socialism and Goodbye Free Markets; Provides Automatic FREE Healthcare for Newborns of Illegal Immigrants & Exempting Undocumented Immigrants from Massive Fines:
By Marc Chamot

Shame on you, Nancy Pelosi! She’s turning out to be the real “whip and a liar,” behind the Obamacare, healthcare reforms.

It seems now that when President Obama said that the undocumented wouldn’t get taxpayer financed medical healthcare, it was all a big LIE.

A real sad legacy for Democrats, President Barack Obama and his Democratic cohorts in the U.S. congress will be known as the Biggest Liars Party.

Do you remember Congressman Joe Wilson’s “You Lie" to Obama, when President Obama said the undocumented wouldn’t get healthcare benefits at TAXPAYER’S expense?

It’s was a big lie all along, just out in the Wall Street Journal, they are reporting on that EVIL Obama and Nancy Pelosi’s H.R. 3962, the one that they are voting for in the house today.

Look here, and check out what they’re pushing for now. LOOK at some of these idiocies that are included in the Democrat’s healthcare proposals. They are definitely trying to pull the wool over the people’s eyes, folks.

Sec. 59b (pp. 297-299) says that when you file your taxes, you must include proof that you are in a qualified plan. If not, you will be fined thousands of dollars. Illegal immigrants are exempt from this requirement.

Sec. 305 (p. 189) provides for automatic Medicaid enrollment of newborns that do not otherwise have insurance.

In addition to reducing future Medicare funding by an estimated $500 billion, the bill fundamentally changes how Medicare pays doctors and hospitals, permitting the government to dictate treatment decisions.

They don’t want to just slash and save 500 billion dollars from Medicaid, take one look where they want to re-direct healthcare money to: Questionable Priorities: While the bill will slash Medicare funding, it will also direct billions of dollars to numerous inner-city social work and diversity programs with vague standards of accountability. It’s an expansion of a socialistic system folks!

The bill also contains other elements, like the government will decide you treatments, NOT YOU nor your doctors!

The congressional dictator, Nancy Pelosi is threatening and pulling her stunts against any Democrats who don’t support this bill. Even the more conservative Blue Dogs are risking their political careers, to stay in Pelosi’s good side for approving this disastrous bill.

Okay friends, this isn’t strange at all coming from agenda driven liberal Democrats. This is typical liberal progressive politics that is common in San Francisco and California. These politicians don’t care one IOTA about VOTERS and their constituencies; they care more about their AGENDAS pulling through more than anything else.

It’s a pretty scary mindset; it’s a dangerous mindset, because these progressive agendas have brought about chaos, higher taxes, and mayhem to most people, and a rash of lawsuits that taxpayers have to pay for.

San Francisco is one of the most sued cities in the nation, these San Francisco supervisors don’t care if the city goes broke because of it, as long as their ideologies, and their agendas becomes the LAW of the LAND.

This is the pattern I’m seeing with this president and his tool in the U.S. House, Nancy Pelosi and company. And folks, that is very dangerous for the future of this country.

What the Pelosi Health-Care Bill Really Says
The health bill that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is bringing to a vote (H.R. 3962) is 1,990 pages. Here are some of the details you need to know.

What the government will require you to do:

• Sec. 202 (p. 91-92) of the bill requires you to enroll in a "qualified plan." If you get your insurance at work, your employer will have a "grace period" to switch you to a "qualified plan," meaning a plan designed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. If you buy your own insurance, there's no grace period. You'll have to enroll in a qualified plan as soon as any term in your contract changes, such as the co-pay, deductible or benefit.

• Sec. 224 (p. 118) provides that 18 months after the bill becomes law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will decide what a "qualified plan" covers and how much you'll be legally required to pay for it. That's like a banker telling you to sign the loan agreement now, then filling in the interest rate and repayment terms 18 months later.

On Nov. 2, the Congressional Budget Office estimated what the plans will likely cost. An individual earning $44,000 before taxes who purchases his own insurance will have to pay a $5,300 premium and an estimated $2,000 in out-of-pocket expenses, for a total of $7,300 a year, which is 17% of his pre-tax income. A family earning $102,100 a year before taxes will have to pay a $15,000 premium plus an estimated $5,300 out-of-pocket, for a $20,300 total, or 20% of its pre-tax income. Individuals and families earning less than these amounts will be eligible for subsidies paid directly to their insurer.

• Sec. 303 (pp. 167-168) makes it clear that, although the "qualified plan" is not yet designed, it will be of the "one size fits all" variety. The bill claims to offer choice—basic, enhanced and premium levels—but the benefits are the same. Only the co-pays and deductibles differ. You will have to enroll in the same plan, whether the government is paying for it or you and your employer are footing the bill.

• Sec. 59b (pp. 297-299) says that when you file your taxes, you must include proof that you are in a qualified plan. If not, you will be fined thousands of dollars. Illegal immigrants are exempt from this requirement.

• Sec. 412 (p. 272) says that employers must provide a "qualified plan" for their employees and pay 72.5% of the cost, and a smaller share of family coverage, or incur an 8% payroll tax. Small businesses, with payrolls from $500,000 to $750,000, are fined less.

Eviscerating Medicare:
In addition to reducing future Medicare funding by an estimated $500 billion, the bill fundamentally changes how Medicare pays doctors and hospitals, permitting the government to dictate treatment decisions.

• Sec. 1302 (pp. 672-692) moves Medicare from a fee-for-service payment system, in which patients choose which doctors to see and doctors are paid for each service they provide, toward what's called a "medical home."

The medical home is this decade's version of HMO-restrictions on care. A primary-care provider manages access to costly specialists and diagnostic tests for a flat monthly fee. The bill specifies that patients may have to settle for a nurse practitioner rather than a physician as the primary-care provider. Medical homes begin with demonstration projects, but the HHS secretary is authorized to "disseminate this approach rapidly on a national basis."

A December 2008 Congressional Budget Office report noted that "medical homes" were likely to resemble the unpopular gatekeepers of 20 years ago if cost control was a priority.

• Sec. 1114 (pp. 391-393) replaces physicians with physician assistants in overseeing care for hospice patients.

• Secs. 1158-1160 (pp. 499-520) initiates programs to reduce payments for patient care to what it costs in the lowest cost regions of the country. This will reduce payments for care (and by implication the standard of care) for hospital patients in higher cost areas such as New York and Florida.

• Sec. 1161 (pp. 520-545) cuts payments to Medicare Advantage plans (used by 20% of seniors). Advantage plans have warned this will result in reductions in optional benefits such as vision and dental care.

• Sec. 1402 (p. 756) says that the results of comparative effectiveness research conducted by the government will be delivered to doctors electronically to guide their use of "medical items and services."

Questionable Priorities:
While the bill will slash Medicare funding, it will also direct billions of dollars to numerous inner-city social work and diversity programs with vague standards of accountability.

• Sec. 399V (p. 1422) provides for grants to community "entities" with no required qualifications except having "documented community activity and experience with community healthcare workers" to "educate, guide, and provide experiential learning opportunities" aimed at drug abuse, poor nutrition, smoking and obesity. "Each community health worker program receiving funds under the grant will provide services in the cultural context most appropriate for the individual served by the program."

These programs will "enhance the capacity of individuals to utilize health services and health related social services under Federal, State and local programs by assisting individuals in establishing eligibility . . . and in receiving services and other benefits" including transportation and translation services.

• Sec. 222 (p. 617) provides reimbursement for culturally and linguistically appropriate services. This program will train health-care workers to inform Medicare beneficiaries of their "right" to have an interpreter at all times and with no co-pays for language services.

• Secs. 2521 and 2533 (pp. 1379 and 1437) establishes racial and ethnic preferences in awarding grants for training nurses and creating secondary-school health science programs. For example, grants for nursing schools should "give preference to programs that provide for improving the diversity of new nurse graduates to reflect changes in the demographics of the patient population." And secondary-school grants should go to schools "graduating students from disadvantaged backgrounds including racial and ethnic minorities."

• Sec. 305 (p. 189) provides for automatic Medicaid enrollment of newborns that do not otherwise have insurance.

For the text of the bill with page numbers, see http://www.defendyourhealthcare.us./
Ms. McCaughey is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a former Lt. Governor of New York State.

Serious Doubts Over Obama & Democrats' Left-Wing Policies; Americas' Moving Right; After the Virginia, New Jersey & Maine Elections:

Serious Doubts Over Obama & Democrats' Left-Wing Policies; Americas' Moving Right; After the Virginia, New Jersey & Maine Elections:
By Marc Chamot

Unhappy Independents once again were the swing voters in this election, the ones that helped Obama, turned against him, and gave New Jersey and Virginia to Republicans.

These elections were pivotal in the gauging the mood of the country, especially for Independent voters like me, but there’s no question about it; my fellow Independents were instrumental in dealing President Obama and his Democratic cohorts a big blow on their egos, like in VOTES of NO confidence, on how this country is being run and managed be these con-men.

When President Obama ran against John McCain, I can’t really blame my fellow Independents who voted for Obama. They took a gamble and made him president, but unfortunately they never realized what they put into the White House, a left-wing agenda driven zealot.

During the nine months that Obama was president, he and the Democrats like Nancy Pelosi, they were all warned, they should have gotten the message when they saw the Tea Parties, when they saw it on the blogs, and when they also saw those summer heated town halls meetings, but they chose to ignore all of those screaming and angry Americans.

President Obama began on a high note, when healthcare began, then there were his oppositions to opposing voices in opinions, he first wanted to go after Internet bloggers with his flag.whitehouse.com, and then he went after Fox News.

What we’re all telling them, is that we don’t want undocumented aliens getting free healthcare, we don’t want transgender to get taxpayer financed sex changes, and we don’t want to finance abortions, SO why is all of that still coming out in the Democrats’ version of the healthcare bill? Are you Democrats so immersed into your own stupidity to listen to what WE’RE TELLING YOU? Of course you are and that’s why you’re losing.

WE don’t want higher TAXES; we don’t want to get into any more debts for your exorbitant programs, look at broken California, and we don’t like your leftists, and socialist agendas interfering with our free market systems and our freedoms.

We don’t want czars in our government, especially known Maoists, and we’re not a ROYAL family nation nor we’re a communist country; we’re the land of the Free, the United States of America. We definitely don’t want Cap and Trade, when it is now known to decimate even more American industries and jobs.

In essence of it all, it is in my estimation, that President Obama’s and Democrat’s poll numbers are far lower than what they are being portrayed by the media. It’s without a doubt; Independents have made an exodus from the Obama dance shows, and turned his administration into harsh realities of what governing is all about.

We were once fooled by former George Bush and his Republicans for six years, and we’re not going to be fooled again by another lying party, especially by those who are doing the exact same things that they gripped about, under the previous administration.

I have told my readers two years ago, on these blogs here, back when candidate Obama entered the presidential race, moving this country to the left too much, wasn’t a good idea. After years of George Bush’s right, and with his bad policies under Republicans, it would stir deeper anger, rejections and more backlash for this country, especially in a slumping economy and when people are losing jobs everyday.

Obama and the Democrats made a whole lot of promises, but unfortunately they haven’t kept any of them.

All Americans are seeing now days from this administration and Democrats, are the constant pandering to minority groups, homosexuals, and illegal aliens, to special interests groups and lobbyists. And we’re getting fed up.

But the Democrats, just like the Republicans before them, if they think that we, the American VOTERS can sit by, and let them trash this nation to shreds, they’ve got something else coming.

We’re all going after these useless and corrupt politicians in Washington, Democrats and Republicans alike, if they don’t take care of us, (Americans) right now, they will be gone soon. And just as the ever corrupt Jon Corzine, who went along with millions of dollars into his campaign and with President Obama, who wasn’t able to help him any with the election’s outcome.

Most left-wing liberal politicians like Nancy Pelosi are secure in their posts, because of loony left San Francisco voters and others, but Blue Dog Democrats beware, you’ll be “dog pounded,” you’re wide OPEN SEASON for defeat in 2010, especially if you keep up with the Obama’s left-wing agendas.

Another big example as to why Americans are getting fed-up with their politicians is Maine.

Their legislature and their Democrat governor had legalized same sex marriages. Regardless as to what the majority in the state thought about it. It was done without their consent and VOTER’S approvals, it was done kind of like, “SCREW-YOU,” in your face kind of stuff, and that is the attitude that we're going to change in our politics.

But the people in Maine woke up and overturned their same sex marriage laws by 53%.

Maine voters overturn legal same-sex marriage
"Voters in Maine repealed a state law legalizing same sex marriage, which backers of the measure said shows "voters don't want to change what you call marriage." Advocates of same-sex marriage refused to concede defeat early Wednesday after supporters declared victory.

Nearly 53 percent of voters backed the referendum of a law the state legislature approved in May and the governor signed.

"Voters have a pretty good grasp about what they think marriage should be," said Jeff Flint, the Sacramento strategist for the Yes on 1 campaign. "It's not that they're discriminatory or bigoted. They just draw the line at what they think marriage should be."

Same sex marriages are okay for Europeans and other very liberal countries, but not in mine.

I am VERY proud of my fellow Independents, they definitely voted right this time. And for those Maine VOTERS who overturned their same sex marriages? I am very proud of you guys too. Hopefully we can take the fight into Massachusetts, Iowa and other places that legalize homosexual marriages, and terminate this idiocy once and for all.

Republicans win Virginia, New Jersey governorships
"Republicans rolled to victory in governor's races in Virginia and New Jersey on Tuesday in a sharp blow to Democrats that showed the limits of U.S. President Barack Obama's influence.

After suffering a one-two punch in those two states, Democrats were trying to salvage a victory over a conservative candidate in a congressional district in upstate New York.

The election outcome in Virginia and New Jersey could offer clues on the mood of America a year after Obama was elected president and a year before 2010 congressional elections that will represent the first clear referendum on Obama's time in office.

While the votes may not have been a referendum on Obama himself, voters clearly expressed concern about the direction of the U.S. economy, which suffers from a 9.8 percent jobless rate the president has been unable to reduce.

Bob McDonnell scored an easy victory over Democrat Creigh Deeds in Virginia. In New Jersey, Republican Chris Christie had a tougher time with incumbent Democratic Governor Jon Corzine but prevailed.

The outcome suggests Democrats have a challenge in trying to attract voters to the polls without Obama's name on the ticket as they prepare to defend their strong majorities in the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2010.

A year ago, Obama became the first Democratic presidential nominee to win Virginia since 1964. Obama campaigned twice for Deeds but Democrats were unable to muster a large turnout the way they did a year ago.

Republicans had not won a statewide race in New Jersey since 1997. Obama won the state by 16 percentage points and traveled there to campaign for Corzine three times.

U.S. television networks projected Christie had scored a narrow victory over Corzine, a former Wall Street executive who pumped $23 million of his own money into the campaign.

The president was described by the White House as not watching the election returns, and spokesman Robert Gibbs earlier dismissed the potential impact of the governors' races on Democrats and the 2010 elections.

"I don't believe that local elections in New Jersey and Virginia portend a lot about legislative success or political success in the future," he said.

But the Republican Party was eager to blame the policies of Obama and the Democrats.
"Tonight voters sent a warning shot to Democrats and the White House they are tired of the spending, tired of the waste, and tired of the over-reach they see coming out of Washington," said Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the U.S. House.

ABC News said majorities of voters in both Virginia and New Jersey approved of Obama's handling of his job -- 51 percent in Virginia and 57 percent in New Jersey.

But it said 90 percent in New Jersey and 85 percent in Virginia said they were worried about the direction of the nation's economy in the next year.

Democratic strategist Bud Jackson said the long night for Democrats could be seen as an indication of impatience with Obama.

"A lot of these people who voted for Obama last year, they voted for the hope. Well, hope hasn't had time to meet reality so there are a lot of independent voters who aren't completely sold on Obama yet and they won't be until they start seeing some results," he said.

In Maine, a "citizen's veto" is on the ballot to overturn a May 2009 law allowing same-sex marriage. If the law is upheld, Maine would become the sixth U.S. state to allow gay marriage, but the first to approve such a law at the ballot box -- a potential turning point for gay rights after a stinging 2008 defeat in California."