Queen of England Gives-Up on European Liberal Agendas, “a Failed Model” & U.S. Democrats Fighting Back Anti-Incumbency Movements with Union Money & Censorship Bills::

Queen of England Gives-Up on European Liberal Agendas, “a Failed Model” & U.S. Democrats Fighting Back Anti-Incumbency Movements with Union Money & Censorship Bills:
By Marc Chamot

Washington Anti-incumbency is in full motion. People desperately want to throw those elected officials and bums out of office; whether they are Democrats or Republicans, and it’s imperative that we “fire” all of these inept office holders, from governing this nation ever again.

Recent public opinion polls show that three quarters of American voters are having doubts and questioning whether this U.S. congress, really know what they’re doing and what they’re dealing with, and whether they are capable of truly solving the worst American economic, illegal immigration problems this nation has ever seen, since the Great Depression.

Per the Washington Examiner; two key government employees unions are pumping $100 million of dollars to keep some Democratic incumbents in office, and two Democrats’, Senator Charles Schumer and Representative Chris Van Hollen of Md., have also introduced a bill to stop and silence critics of what this Democratic congress have done for the past two years. That means shutting up discussion boards, bloggers and talk radio!

At the same time last week, the SEIU and the AFSCME unions have pumped-in, a combined 100 million dollars; to save Washington inept Democrat incumbent’s political careers and the AFL-CIO will soon follow.

Top union boss Gerald McEntee of AFSCME, had openly boasted about what he will do, “Whatever it takes to protect Democratic Party incumbencies’.” He also said “it’s going to be hard, with those crazy tea baggers are out there.”

While these meaningless, and pieces of special interests, and inept politicians are fighting hard against the inevitable, while finding more air to breathe, to stay alive after these Midterms’ elections, we’ve got our president out in San Francisco, trying to defend one of his own, the so very indebted to the unions/pro-immigration groups, the VERY inept Barbara Boxer.

This president is already 0 for 4 in endorsements for past loony Democratic politicians, does he want to make it 0 for five? Last poll taken, Boxer is virtually tied with all three Republicans who are running against her.

And then in Great Britain, there’s someone there with some brains, unlike the brainless moles we’ve got in U.S. congress and within the presidency. Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II austerity message to the House of Lords (similar to our U.S. congress), she detailed the gravity of issues that is destroying Great Britain, just as what we’ve got going on here.

Queen Elizabeth details British austerity plan: “Tuesday in a speech outlining the plans of Britain's new coalition government - setting out a program for sharp curbs to public spending, new regulation of the financial sector and changes to the centuries-old political system.


Delivering her address, drafted by government officials on her behalf, the queen said Britain would seek to immediately tackle a record national deficit. Public sector net borrowing for the fiscal year ending April 5 was $233 billion.


"The first priority is to reduce the deficit and restore economic growth," the queen said, addressing legislators from a throne in the House of Lords.


Under the 18-month program, the Bank of England will take over regulation of financial services and a new independent Office of Budget Responsibility will handle economic forecasts.


There will be a review over raising the state pension age, a planned increase in payroll taxes will be scrapped, and a new tax levied on banks. Immigration from outside the European Union will be capped.”

Ah! What a bright lady she is. At least Her Majesty the Queen of England knows, what is truly ailing her country, it’s a whole lot more than what I can say for these bunches here at home, they are way out of touch and totally out of sync.

“Her Majesty hits her nation’s problems right on the proverbial nail; massive deficits and spending, and higher taxes won’t RESOLVE the problems. With out of control civil service jobs (government jobs), and out of control government pension’s costs; with out of control immigrations.”

Had her Majesty the Queen dug a little deeper, she would have found China to be one of her biggest culprits too. Just as in the U.S., Europe and her nation are laden with cheap and over surpluses of Chinese products that is tearing apart their own manufacturers’ and jobs.

“In a debate following the monarch's address, Prime Minister David Cameron acknowledged cuts to spending will be tough, and likely unpopular - but looked to pin the blame on Britain's ousted leader Gordon Brown, saying he had offered "not one word of apology for the appalling mess that has been left in this country."

Does President Obama really thinks with 1,200 national guardsmen, can REALLY help secure the Mexican border? Who is he really kidding? Not us.

Obama set to send 1,200 troops to US-Mexico border: "Under pressure to take action, President Barack Obama on Tuesday ordered 1,200 National Guard troops to boost security along the U.S.-Mexico border, pre-empting Republican efforts to force a congressional vote to send the troops.
Obama will also request $500 million for border protection and law enforcement activities, according to lawmakers and administration officials.


The president's action comes as chances for comprehensive immigration reform, Obama's long-stated goal, look increasingly dim in this election year. Obama has been all but compelled to do something since Arizona's passage of a tough illegal-immigration law thrust the border problem into the public spotlight.


Indeed, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer credited her signing of the controversial new law for compelling Obama to act. Signing the law, Brewer said in a statement, "clearly ignited the talk of action in Washington for the people of Arizona and other border states."


The National Guard troops will work on intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance support, analysis and training, and support efforts to block drug trafficking. They will temporarily supplement Border Patrol agents until Customs and Border Protection can recruit and train additional officers and agents to serve on the border, according to a letter Tuesday from top administration security officials to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich.


The White House released the letter signed by national security adviser James Jones and White House counterterror chief John Brennan not long after Obama met at the Capitol with Republican senators who pressed him on immigration issues, including the question of sending troops to the border.


Arizona Sens. John McCain and Jon Kyl have been urging such a move, and Republicans planned to try to require it as an amendment to a pending war spending bill.
In a speech Tuesday on the Senate floor, McCain said the situation on the U.S.-Mexico border has "greatly deteriorated." He called for 6,000 National Guard troops to be sent, and he asked for $250 million more to pay for them.


"I appreciate the additional 1,200 being sent ... as well as an additional $500 million, but it's simply not enough," McCain said.


McCain's amendment would direct the defense secretary to deploy the National Guard troops. The letter from Jones and Brennan took scathing aim at that approach.


"It represents an unwarranted interference with the commander in chief's responsibilities to direct the employment of our armed forces," Jones and Brennan wrote."