Field Poll; Insane California Independent Voters Want to Keep Same Losers “Status Quo's,” Barbara Boxer Leading Carly Fiorina by 8 Points & New York Times Admits Big GOP Victories & Defeats for Obama Liberals:

Field Poll; Insane California Independent Voters Want to Keep Same Losers “Status Quo's,” Barbara Boxer Leading Carly Fiorina by 8 Points & New York Times Admits Big GOP Victories & Defeats for Obama Liberals:

By Marc Chamot

The San Francisco Giants have gotten this city in uproars. Unfortunately, I’m not much of a sports fan, if I were; I wouldn’t be wasting so much time blogging politics. Whether they win or lose, I couldn’t care less.

Most voters have already voted or made up their minds, the Field Poll found, and status quos’ alive and well in California. Do you ever wonder why this state is so screwed up? Take one look at the recent straw polls for U.S. Senate. Barbara Boxer has jumped into 8 points lead over Republican Carly Fiorina.

“The Field Poll also showed that both Senate candidates have a solid grip on their respective partisans. But the independents who make up 1 in 5 California voters and would always decide this race favor Boxer 49 to 32 percent."

Bucking the trend, California is bucking a national trend that shows independents favoring the GOP, California Independents are total disgrace to my party.

While California voters are giving U.S. Senator, Barbara Boxer some of the lowest approval ratings of her career, this Senator from California, Barbara Boxer, has a net jobs approval of Minus 1, with a 44% approval and 45% disapproval rating, a dramatic drop from the February, 2008 poll which had Boxer at plus 19. 

Source: “Incumbent Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer appears to be fending off a strong challenge by Republican Carly Fiorina in California's U.S. Senate race, racking up an eight-point lead and getting strong support from independent voters, according to a new Field Poll.

With just four days to go in the campaign, the widely watched poll shows Boxer leading Fiorina 49 to 41 percent. Another 4 percent of likely voters favor other candidates, and 6 percent are undecided.

Field Poll Director Mark DiCamillo described Boxer's lead as "comfortable" and the largest she's had since similar polls in the spring and summer.

Boxer will turn 70 next month and is seeking her fourth term. With 12.4 percent unemployment in California, the third-highest rate in the nation, Fiorina has made this the toughest race of Boxer's career since she narrowly won her Senate seat in 1992.

Just days ago, analysts listed the race as a toss-up, despite the state's deep blue politics. Now most have moved it to the leans-Democrat column.”

What are California voters thinking? It absolute lunacy and absurd! A state which has dropped from ranked 7 economies in the world to eighth, and still dropping, under Democrat’s control, and they want the same old status quos’ of anti-business, anti-industries, anti-farming and other economical corrupt cronies in government?

That is why I’m very happy about the GOP takeover of the U.S. house soon. Any GOP/Republicans who allow and VOTE for federal stimuli, subsidies and bailouts for the state of California, and similar states that don’t show fiscal responsibilities, should all be tarred, feathered and chased out of town.

I've got a BIG message for these California MORONS; If I'm a betting man, with GOP back in control, Carly Fiorina will have far better edge in getting needed federal moneys, to this cash strapped state than Barbara (Boxed OUT) Boxer. Watch this scenario being played out. 

The best thing about blogging, I am afforded the luxury to read the Wall Street Journal, and the oft liberal New York Times. They are both among the top three newspapers circulation wise in the United States. They do help provide more insight and information for my blogs, where as other Medias aren’t enough to give me the complete picture on politics.

I tend to agree with the Wall Street journal opinion pieces and reject the New Your Times’ most of the time. I also get a big kick reading their articles. They tend to be more traditional, and polite; they tend use adjectives on proper nouns, like Mr. Obama, Mrs. Nancy Pelosi and Mr. Harry Reid and so forth.

Well… I’m more untraditional, I could make my blog posts look like the Wall Street Journal and New York Times, but, nah, that’s not me. I like being meaner, crude and rude, I’m considered more like traditional Gonzo journalist.

Wikipedia: “Gonzo journalism is a style of journalism that is written subjectively, often including the reporter as part of the story via a first-person narrative. Gonzo journalism tends to favor style over accuracy and often uses personal experiences and emotions to provide context for the topic or event being covered. It disregards the 'polished' edited product favored by newspaper media and strives for a more gritty approach. Use of quotations, sarcasm, humor, exaggeration, and profanity is common.”

If I became more like the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, using adjectives on proper nouns in my articles, maybe, I could be among top three blogs on the Net? I’m just kidding folks. 

I’m quite amazed, the New York Times has finally admitted to Democratic defeats in the midterms. A pro-Obama and liberal publication, one that has been accused of holding back stories, especially stories that most affect the liberal movements in this country, have finally come to their realizations and senses, they can’t carry the banners for liberals anymore.

In every poll, including this one from New York Times, Obama’s Hope and Change wasn’t the one they WANTED or expected! Well? The morals of this "Krazy" story for future party politicians, when you promise something BIG, YOU BETTER DARN WELL DELIVER or ELSE!

In Thursday’s edition of New York Times, front page; Coalition that Vaulted Democrats into Power Has Frayed, Poll Finds: Critical parts of the coalition that delivered President Obama to the White House in 2008 and gave Democrats control of Congress in 2006 are switching their allegiance to the Republicans in the final phase of the midterm Congressional elections, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.

Republicans have wiped out the advantage held by Democrats in recent election cycles among women, Roman Catholics, less affluent Americans and independents. All of those groups broke for Mr. Obama in 2008 and for Congressional Democrats when they grabbed both chambers from the Republicans four years ago, according to exit polls.

The poll provides a pre-Election Day glimpse of a nation so politically disquieted and disappointed in its current trajectory that 57 percent of the registered voters surveyed said they were more willing to take a chance this year on a candidate with little previous political experience. More than a quarter of them said they were even willing to back a candidate who holds some views that “seem extreme.”

On the issue most driving the campaign, the economy, Republicans have erased the traditional advantage held by Democrats as the party seen as better able to create jobs; the parties are now even on that measure. By a wide margin, Republicans continue to be seen as the party better able to reduce the federal budget deficit.

But it does offer a clear indication of party strength at the end of what has been a particularly intense and hard-fought midterm campaign with more bad news than good for Mr. Obama and his party.

Overall, 46 percent of likely voters said they would vote for Republicans and 40 percent said they would support Democrats.

A higher percentage of Americans continues to have a more favorable opinion of the Democratic Party than of the Republican Party, with 46 percent favoring Democrats and 41 favoring Republicans.

But the Republicans’ favorability rating in the New York Times/CBS poll is at its highest level since September 2006.

Disapproval of Congress, however, remains near its highest level in the history of the Times/CBS poll: 76 percent of respondents disapproved, 14 percent approved, and 10 percent expressed no opinion.

Mr. Obama’s approval rating remains below 50 percent. It is 43 percent among registered voters, which is about where President Bill Clinton’s approval rating was in the 1994 midterm elections when Republicans swept control of the House and the Senate.

The Democratic House speaker, Representative Nancy Pelosi, clearly emerged as a political liability for her party in the latest Times/CBS poll.

Overall, 43 percent of respondents had an unfavorable opinion of Ms. Pelosi; 15 percent had a favorable opinion, and 40 percent said they had no opinion. The minority leader in the House who would probably become the speaker if Republicans win the majority, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, remains largely unknown. Three quarters of respondents said they had no opinion of him.

Like several other national polls, the latest Times/CBS poll shows a considerable “enthusiasm gap” between Republicans and Democrats. Six in 10 Republicans said they were more enthusiastic about voting this year than usual. Four in 10 Democrats said the same.

The poll includes indications that Republicans will have their own challenges should they gain control of one or both chambers of Congress with a new crop of lawmakers who identify with the Tea Party.

About 6 in 10 Republicans who are likely to vote think the views of most Republicans are consistent with those of the Tea Party movement, which, though diffuse, has had success this year in arguing that Republicans have been too eager to choose compromise over principle.

Yet 78 percent of respondents said they believed Republicans in Congress should compromise some of their positions to get things done and 15 percent said they should stick to their positions even if it means getting less done. Similar percentages said they wanted Democrats to choose compromise over principle.

Take a look at this amazing POLL!