The Marc Chamot Report Headline Animator

Guest Bloggers, Opposing Views & Link Exchanges, Are Always Welcomed at the Marc Chamot Report:

Addthis Sharing Gadget

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Obama; Most Suing & Anti-State President in U.S. History, Keeps Using Biased Justice & Federal Courts, Judges to Suppress States For Liberal Agendas:

Removals of Pro-Federalist Barack Obama; Most Suing & Anti-State President in U.S. History, Keeps Using Biased Justice & Federal Courts, Judges to Suppress States For Liberal Agendas:
By Marc Chamot

"People revolts; if it can happen in Russia, it could happen in America. When you ignore your people too long, or if you keep on suppressing your people, sooner or later, the masses will come out and throw you out of office!"

President Obama has won a new distinction in the annals of American history, he is the most sue happy, pro-federalist, and intrusive state’s rights’, U.S. president we’ve had in recent memory. 

From subverting state rights on death penalties, such as the Sodium Thiopental shortages, suing and confiscating from states, that acquires these hard to come by and legal drugs for executions, through other means than domestic.

It’s been, one court battle after another, from Obamacare, to illegal immigrations, and enforcements over voter I.D.’s and other fiascos. Barack Obama is definitely the most anti-state right, state rights obstructionist American president we’ve seen for quite some time.

Until Obama arrived on the scene, states were within their bounds passing their own laws, and without much interference from the Feds, unlike with the Obama justice departments, who are getting right down, and dirty, through Federal courts and with their Federal judges.

After series of unpopular rulings and setbacks towards states, who have been passing their own sets of laws, because the Feds have been ineffective in controlling Voter I.D. frauds and illegal immigrations, laws within the U.S. constitution, and within state rights, states have been sued left and right, and there’s no doubt that Federal judges, are in the pockets of Obama Federal government and liberal agendas, rather than for state’s rights.

Obama has shown Americans, and proven to the entire world, and to every-one, on how one-sided, biased and intrusive natures of Federal judges have over states. Most tend to favor Federalism over states rights, and naturally, they get paid by the Feds, not by the states. But these Federal judges are destroying what made America great, states’ rights.

"The Justice Department blocked implementation of the state's voter ID law on Friday, saying it could make it harder for tens of thousands of minorities to vote, according to the Associated Press. It is the first voter ID law to be rejected by the federal government in nearly 20 years.

Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez outlined the large number of citizens the legislation would affect in a letter to South Carolina officials, the Los Angeles Times reported.

"According to the state's statistics, there are 81,938 minority citizens who are already registered to vote and who lack DMV-issued identification," Perez wrote, referring to driver’s licenses issued by the state's Department of Motor Vehicles, the most common form of photo ID."

But here’s the truth: was this a political payback? For starters, John McCain won South Carolina in the 2008 presidential race. And Obama and company could never get over it.

John McCain GOP 1,018,756 53.8%
Barack Obama Dem 850,121 44.9%

Secondly, President Obama is not a big proponent of E-Verify. Of course, since South Carolina passed their toughest E-Verify laws, HB 4400 - Passed in 2008, HB 4400 requires the mandatory use of E-Verify for all employers by July 1, 2010. 

All public employers, private employers with more than 100 employees and public contractors with more than 500 employees were required to comply by January 1, 2009.

All private employers must comply by July 1, 2009 and all other all businesses by January 1, 2010.Secondly, President Obama is not a big proponent of E-Verify. Of course, since South Carolina passed their toughest E-Verify laws, HB 4400 - Passed in 2008, HB 4400 requires the mandatory use of E-Verify for all employers by July 1, 2010.

So naturally, South Carolina is getting the brunt of the Obama paybacks. Giving Obama all the reasons to use the justice department, to seek and destroy states that don’t support the liberal agendas.

With recent and unpopular legal actions by Obama, and paybacks over states, who want to get tough on Illegal immigrations and Voter I.D. frauds, shows the urgency that is needed to remove this man from the presidency.

However, it is going to be tough to unseat Barack Obama. Recent polls show his approval ratings rising again, while GOP/Republicans are self destructing, falling apart. 

There is no question that the GOP presidential candidates are very weak and less appealing to voters in general.

What’s keeping Obama politically alive, people; Americans have not blamed him for the sorry state of the U.S. joblessness and economy. According to polls, the blame goes squarely on former President George Bush and congress.

The Republicans in congress aren’t looking too good these days. The popular pendulum’s slowly swinging back towards Democrats.

Republicans are forgetting they cannot play games with people’s lives. 

And for Barack Obama, whether it’s real or not, even though he lied to us the first time when he ran for the presidency, acting as being the populist president, he’s doing it once more and the people are falling for it again.

Unless the GOP get their act together soon, it will be another four for Obama and more destruction's for state's rights. 

It is still possible for a third party to intervene. Donald Trump? If his stock hasn't dried up yet, and Trump has got to double his work output for the damages done to his reputation, after putting his foot in the GOP ring and then pulling out again. Trump or GOP are going to have to play the populist message, Obama's playing, if they want equal footing into the 2012 elections. 

Friday, December 23, 2011

Rise of the Independents! Analysis: State Voter Registration Statistics Show 2.5 Million Dissatisfied & Unhappy Voters, Abandoned Democratic and Republican Parties since 2008 Elections:

Rise of the Independents! Analysis: State Voter Registration Statistics Show 2.5 Million Dissatisfied & Unhappy Voters, Abandoned Democratic and Republican Parties since 2008 Elections:
By Marc Chamot

The straw that broke the camel’s back is here, finally;

“More than 2.5 million voters have left the Democratic and Republican parties since the 2008 elections, while the number of independent voters continues to grow. A USA TODAY analysis of state voter registration statistics shows registered Democrats declined in 25 of the 28 states that register voters by party. Republicans dipped in 21 states, while independents increased in 18 states.”

People are finally saying enough, and are waking up to the corruptive political machines of our times. People are fed-up with political parties, and political machines that are being dominated by one political party or another, players and benefactors, whether Democrat or Republican benefit when most don’t.

We’ve all seen it with the Kennedy clans in Massachusetts, the George Bush’s clans in Texas, the Jerry Brown clans in California, and in Chicago with the ever corruptive, Richard J Daley and his ever-corruptive and crony successors.

As in San Francisco and California, with the most corruptive Burton brothers, John and Phil, and with their Willie Brown machines, not the Jerry Brown we know, but unrelated; the African American Brown and former Speaker of the Assembly, Willie Lewis Brown who ruled over California for over thirty years with an iron fist, until voters got fed-up and enacted term limits to throw him out.

Brown and the Burton brothers, commonly called the Brown-Burton Machine, ruled and controlled Democratic races in San Francisco Bay Area and California for decades. And we’ve seen more of the same in Muskogee Oklahoma, and Fort Smith Arkansas, as is in other places; it finally took some kind of voter approved term limit s, and initiatives, to break the corruptive stranglehold and aspects of corruptive American politics these people had over their communities.

Unfortunately, as is the case with the California Burton-Brown machines, they are out of current politics, however, the cronyism and corruptions are still there, with them deeply into someone’s pockets, and lining up their pockets with wealth and are still involved, at the helm of California politics behind the scenes. 

Before Willie L. Brown was thrown out of the state assembly through voter approved term limits, and after the urging of the Fang family, Jack Davis, and Warren Hinkle, encouraged Willie to run for mayor of San Francisco.

Brown won against former police chief Frank Jordan, who the kingmakers, Fangs, Jack Davis and Warren Hinkle had placed in office a term before, presided over San Francisco as mayor, and those were one of the most turbulent and corrupt times in San Francisco’s history, benefitting the most, of course, the Fang family, Jack Davis, Hinkle and their political allies.

They turned on their former ally and friend Frank Jordan, when he wasn’t lining up their pockets with money. These guys, got rich and wealthy under Willie Brown, however, the then Hearst Corporation Examiner and the San Francisco Chronicle, spent years exposing all of the mayor’s corruptive acts, with those key people on top of the news and FBI investigations, mainly the Fang family.

Willie Brown, after leaving the mayor’s office after major scandals, the current owners, the Hearst’s San Francisco Chronicle, hired Brown as a paid columnist for their paper. Willie Brown could have gotten away with murder, because former President Bill Clinton, and Janet Reno with the justice department, were in full mode cover-ups for Brown and the Fang shenanigans. Imagine that!

So it is not that surprising people are getting fed-up, with political parties and they want change. But the change isn’t coming the way they want it, or it is supposed to be, so they are getting off the sinking political ship of the Democratic and Republican parties.  
    
Voters leaving Republican, Democratic parties in droves “The trend is acute in states that are key to next year's presidential race. In the eight swing states that register voters by party, Democrats' registration is down by 800,000 and Republicans' by 350,000. Independents have gained 325,000.

The pattern continues a decades-long trend that has seen a diminution in the power of political parties, giving rise to independents as Ross Perot and Ralph Naderand the popularity this year of libertarian Republican Ron Paul.

"The strident voices of both the left and the right have sort of soured people from saying willingly that they belong to one party or the other," says Doug Lewis, who represents state elections officials. "If both sides call each other scurrilous dogs, then the public believes that both sides are probably scurrilous dogs."

Registered Democrats still dominate the political playing field with more than 42 million voters, compared to 30 million Republicans and 24 million independents. But Democrats have lost the most — 1.7 million, or 3.9%, from 2008.

Democratic registration has fared worse than Republicans in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New HampshireNew MexicoNorth Carolina and Pennsylvania — the eight swing states with party registration. Republican losses are biggest in Nevada, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania.

The decline is due to a variety of factors. People move, people die, people revolt in disgust. Many are stripped from registration rolls by states seeking to remove inactive voters.

By contrast, the number of independents has grown for years and is up more than 400,000 since 2008, or 1.7%. States with big gains: Colorado, Florida, North Carolina — and Arizona, a possible target for President Obama in 2012.

The 2012 winner, says North Carolina elections director Gary Bartlett, will be "whoever is attractive to the unaffiliated voter."


Radical & Left-Wing, Anti-Semitic & Racist SPLC, Southern Poverty Law Center Sued for Slander, Libel & Defamation:

Radical & Left-Wing, Anti-Semitic & Racist SPLC, Southern Poverty Law Center Sued for Slander, Libel & Defamation:
By Marc Chamot

First with advice to GOP/Republicans and Boehner: When taking on President Obama, pick the right battles; don't pick the ones that policies could affect millions of hurting Americans, mainly those who need tax breaks and the millions of unemployed, who need unemployment checks to keep surviving in a jobless economy.

Otherwise, you'll end up giving Barack Obama more credence and popularity, and you'll, well, keep on looking like the fools you really are. When the people suffer, because of your battles with President Obama, Obama wins and you lose the popularity contest, especially going into 2012. That's how it works in real life.

What can anyone say about the organization that lionizes left-wing radicals like unrepentant, current Obama ally and supporter, Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers.

An organization that supports anti-Semites, anti-Israel, people like former U.S. President Jimmy ‘Jimbo’ Carter, and an organization notorious for smearing innocent individuals, who don’t espouse to their radical-left-wing ideals or the tramping over the U.S. constitution.

An organization that uses race cards on their opponents, when it comes to supporters of policies they don’t like, all the while, being anti-Semites, racists towards Jews and Israel, pro-Palestinian, anti-constitutional, anti-state, and pro-federalism, which likes to label their opponents as hate groups, when in essence they are subverting, undermining, and destroying the United States' constitution is finally being sued.

Former conservative and pro-constitutional Arizona Sheriff, Richard Mack is suing Southern Poverty Law Center for viscous and venomous lies being spread about him and his organization, founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association. 

An organization of sheriffs and law enforcement, who believe and support state rights, over the ever intrusive Federal government.

Southern Poverty Law Center fully campaigned, by intentionally spreading lies, about former Sheriff, Richard Mack, to news organizations and other law enforcement groups to discredit him and his organization.

They said that Mr. Mack once said in a speech that he advocated the shootings of federal agents, and IRS agents in particular, which was fabricated, totally made up by the law center to destroy Mack’s organization.

Part of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association ideals and goals, were to eliminate illegal immigration and forcibly secure the Southern borders with Mexico, from drug traffickers and rampant illegal immigration. 

All those lies by the law center, destroyed Mr. Mack’s reputation and standings within the law enforcement community across the country. Southern Poverty Law Center means; Subverting and Promoting Lies on the U.S. Constitution, and unfortunately for this radical left-wing organization, they finally admitted  Lying About Sheriff Mack, Lawsuit PendingLater that day, says Mack, he received a call from spokesman Mark Potok, who edits the organization's Intelligence Report.  Potok said, Sheriff, we owe you an apology.

Sheriff Mack says I knocked on the phone and said ‘Is this really Mark Potok of the SPLC who doesn't care who they lie about? I don't trust you.

Mack says Potok then admitted, We went back and reviewed the tape where we reported you advocated shooting agents and that isn't what you said.

Potok agreed to reprint a retraction. However, says Mack, the retraction was a tiny paragraph, compared to the massive coverage they had given to the earlier false charges about him. And it could not even begin to undo the vast damage they done in smearing his name and the CSPOA before other law enforcement agencies.

Mack pointed out that Sheriff Dwight Nothstein of Carbon County, Pennsylvania, for instance, has publicly compared Sheriff Mack to Hitler and repeated the SPLC charge that he has advocated shooting federal agents.

It does hurt me to see that the SPLC, which does training for every federal law enforcement agency, including other police and sheriff's agencies all across the country, will actually tell these people that there's something inherently wrong with someone who quotes the Founding Fathers and our Constitution,” he told The New American. That's all I'm guilty of.

And isn't it interesting that I'm called a racist, a bigot, a hate group monger, and I [supposedly] hate everybody because I simply quote American ideals as  expressed by the Founding Fathers? That's my crime. And yet I get slandered all over the country to my fellow brothers and sisters in law enforcement.

But the Sheriff is not one to let such things get him down; besides a busy speaking schedule, he is very active with a number of positive efforts and is always upbeat and optimistic.

In addition to launching his SPLC lawsuit and a congressional campaign, he is also releasing his newly published book, The Magic of Gun Control (cover shown above) and gearing up for his CSPOA  “Constitutional Sheriffs Convention” in January 2012 in Las Vegas.

He is hoping to bring together 150-200 sheriffs from across the country, together with other law enforcement officers to discuss with them their role in the lawful and peaceful way to restore the Constitution and its Bill of Rights as the supreme law of the land."

Please, support Richard Mack’s battles against the radical-left-wing organization, Southern Poverty Law Center. Let’s put them out of existence. 

Sheriff Mack is a great American, a constitutional American, patriotic like us, and he needs our full support for taking on the evils and destructions that is being maliciously being perpetrated towards this country. Check out Mr. Richard Mack’s website, and tell him you support him!

How to Contact Mr. Richard Mack: Richard Mack is available for live speaking events and television or radio interviews. He has recently moved from Safford, Arizona to Fredericksburg, Texas.

For BOOKINGS, please email: amsmith@windstream.net phone: 830.456.9547 OFFICE phone: 830.307.3077,1605 A East Main Street, Fredericksburg, TX 78624
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Newt Gingrich Riling Against Judicial Dictatorships, Crony Judges, Activism & Legislating from the Benches & Poll: Most Voters Don’t Like their 2012 Presidential Candidates:

Newt Gingrich Riling Against Judicial Dictatorships, Crony Judges, Activism & Legislating from Benches & Poll: Most Voters Don’t Like their 2012 Presidential Candidates:
By Marc Chamot

The American constitution says judges are to rule according to the constitution, but does not grant judges the right to legislate from the bench. 

Activist judges are becoming unpopular among general voters, and Newt Gingrich said Saturday that he's "fed up with elitist judges" who seek to impose their "radically un-American" views.

Voters should be fed up with pandering politicians who pretend to support the Constitution while working to undermine it. Amen to that!

Everyone’s down on Newt Gingrich, when he made recent stirs of controversy, with his judges’ comments. Though, judges in general are not too popular among the public. What bother most libertarians and conservatives alike, are those judges who legislate policies from the bench.

Gingrich would support having the police, or U.S. marshals drag judges before Congress for interrogation.

One of the grossest Kennard’s, or gripes of American judicial misconducts, when voters or even legislatures come out with popular policies, and when opposing groups don’t like these decisions, or the outcome, they go find like-minded judges, who usually end-up blocking such enacted policies.  

It is a common nerve-wrecking practice that is being played out throughout the nation. We see it in gay marriages, and we see it on rampant and out of control illegal immigration. We also see it in states, when they try to right a wrong, like rising costs of illegal immigration, enacting policies, where it’s a common tactic being used more often, by liberals than conservatives, to repeal enacted policies they don’t like by using their crony judges.

We shouldn’t be obligated at taxpayer’s expense, to be paying for medical care, providing free schoolings and higher educations for the undocumented’s, but we do, because these activist judges say we have to do it, regardless the damages being done to our pocketbooks!

Most policies, and the majority of policies voted through popular means, are usually conservative leaning, which liberals use legislatures from the benches, activist judges, most common, to rule in favor of policies that get the ire of liberals.

We once thought that America was a true democracy, where our votes counted, but that’s not true anymore. This country is being run by biased, personal interest judges, mostly Federal judges legislating from the bench, infringing on state and voter’s rights, regardless of the U.S. constitution.

What Gingrich is saying; judges have done insidious and contrarian damages to American policies that were legally enacted by legislatures and voters in this country. Liberals like to call it, judicial independence, and some people call it judicial dictatorships.  And he is right. 

Poll: Americans don't like what they see in 2012 race “A USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds a nation more downbeat, more dissatisfied with its political leadership and more concerned about the country's direction than at almost any other point in modern times.

By wide margins, those surveyed say the election process isn't working and the candidates aren't coming up with good ideas to solve the nation's problems.

Fewer than half say there is any candidate running, Republican or Democratic, who would make a good president.

It is not surprising, Americans are angry as heck and the fields of presidential candidates from both parties are pretty horrendous. All that we're getting, are the same old, same old, sold out Washington hacks to special interests, i.e. illegal immigration's and Wall Street. 

Americans by 4-1 say it makes "a real difference" to them who is elected president, and a 53% majority strongly agrees that the stakes in this election are higher than in previous years. 

Almost two-thirds of registered voters are "afraid of what will happen" if the candidate they support doesn't win.

In general-election matchups, President Obama edges Republican candidates Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich by precisely the same percentages, 50%-48%.

The findings underscore how much the 2012 election is about Obama, not his opposition. That's disquieting news for the president's strategists, who argue the election should be seen as a choice between two candidates, not a referendum on the incumbent.

Most of those who support the president say they will cast their votes to support Obama, while by roughly 2-1, backers of Romney and Gingrich will cast their votes to oppose Obama.

Neither the president nor anyone else in Washington gets high grades for the job done this year.
Just 8% say Obama has done an "excellent" job, a rating given by 3% to congressional Democrats and 2% to congressional Republicans. All three are given a "poor" rating by a plurality of those surveyed.

Even their own partisans don't rate them highly: A third of Democrats say Obama did a fair or poor job this year. Nearly eight in 10 Republicans say congressional Republicans have done a fair or poor job, and six in 10 Democrats say the same of congressional Democrats.”

"We're looking at the politics of backlash," says Lawrence Jacobs of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota

Americans see a political process that is "out of touch and paralyzed in the face of crushing economic conditions and fear about the future. It's as if the country is on the Titanic and it's going down, and you've got Congress and the presidential field playing violins."

Lower than whale dung; there is no question about it. After recent polls showing U.S. congress, with its historic 11% jobs approval ratings, there is going to be some kind of a voter’s backlash in 2012, and it isn’t going to be pretty. 

Washington, We've Got a Problem; Joe Biden "the Taliban is Not our Enemy" & Records-Low 11% Approvals for U.S. Congress:


Washington, We've Got a Problem; Joe Biden "the Taliban is Not our Enemy" & Records-Low 11% Approvals for U.S. Congress:
By Marc Chamot

Sorriest bunch, we've ever had in U.S government history!

Washington, we’ve got a problem; what we’ve got, is uneducated, grammar ridden school flunkeys, and absolute idiots in Washington D.C today.

Lord, please save us from our idiotic elected officials; And again; the Cars 54, Where Are Yours, the glorified moron, and the Barney Fife of all Vice Presidents, Joe Biden came out saying the ‘Taliban is not our enemy.’

In Biden Does It Again: 'The Taliban Is Not Our Enemy' “The White House on Monday defended Vice President Joe Biden for saying that the Taliban isn't an enemy of the United States despite the years spent fighting the militant Islamic group that gave a home to Al Qaeda and its leader Usama bin Laden while he plotted the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

"It's only regrettable when taken out of context," White House spokesman Jay Carney said of the vice president's remarks in an interview published Monday.

"It is a simple fact that we went into Afghanistan because of the attack on the United States on Sept. 11, 2001. We are there now to ultimately defeat Al Qaeda, to stabilize Afghanistan and stabilize it in part so that Al Qaeda or other terrorists who have as their aim attacks on the United States cannot establish a foothold again in that country," Carney continued.

"Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy. That's critical," Biden said. "There is not a single statement that the president has ever made in any of our policy assertions that the Taliban is our enemy, because it threatens U.S. interests. 

If, in fact, the Taliban is able to collapse the existing government, which is cooperating with us in keeping the bad guys from being able to do damage to us, then that becomes a problem for us." 

When Congress keeps on coming out, with very unpopular policies like they did with  S.1867 the National Defense Authorization Act, attacks on our liberties, which passed to the dismay of Libertarians all over, it's not surprising that we're going to see mass sweepings, across the board changes of U.S. congress in 2012. 

Congress Ends 2011 With Record-Low 11% Approval "Annual average for 2011, 17%, also lowest in Gallup history. A new record-low 11% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing, the lowest single rating in Gallup's history of asking this question since 1974. This earns Congress a 17% yearly average for 2011, the lowest annual congressional approval rating in Gallup history.

The record-low 11% rating is based on a Gallup survey conducted Dec. 15-18, and comes at a time when Congress is wrangling once again at the last minute over extensions of a payroll tax holiday, unemployment benefits, and higher pay for Medicare doctors.

This discord in Washington caps off a year in which Congress fought bitterly before reaching a last-minute agreement to lift the debt ceiling, instructing a bipartisan super committee to cut more than $1 trillion from federal spending by the end of November. That objective was not reached, and the super committee ultimately announced that it could not reach an agreement, and disbanded.

The previous low Gallup reading for congressional job approval was 13%, recorded in August, October, and November of this year, and in December 2010. The highest approval rating for Congress is 84% in October 2001, a month after the terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C.

The current 86% disapproval rating for Congress is the highest in Gallup history, two percentage points higher than the 84% recorded in August.

Never Popular, Congress' Annual Approval This Year at New Low; From a broad, long-term perspective, Congress has never been popular. The average annual congressional job approval rating since 1974 is 34%. Still, this year's 17% annual average is by one point the lowest yearly average Gallup has recorded. 

It is slightly below the annual averages of 19% recorded in 2010 and in 2008, as well as two years in which Gallup recorded only one measure of congressional approval -- 1979 and in 1992, with readings of 19% and 18%, respectively.

The average 78% disapproval of Congress this year ties the all-time low recorded in the single 1992 Gallup poll. Republicans, Independents, and Democrats All Give Congress Low Ratings:

Over the last three months, Democrats have been almost as negative as Republicans and independents about Congress, with Democrats in December at 14% approval, independents at 7%, and Republicans at 12%. The partisan groups began to hold Congress in similarly negative esteem in in August, when Democratic approval of Congress dropped. 

Through much of 2009 and 2010, and in several months this year, Democrats had been more positive about Congress than either independents or Republicans.

Bottom Line: This month's record-low congressional job approval rating is one of a number of measures of Congress that have reached historical low points this year. This suggests that 2011 will be remembered as the year in which the American public lost much of any remaining faith in the men and women they elect and send off to Washington to represent them.

It is difficult to pinpoint the precise causes for this situation. Clearly, the perceived bad economy, the increasing polarization between political parties and the highly visible instances of congressional inability to reach agreement on how to fix problems have all contributed.

Last year, faced with congressional approval ratings that were also low, albeit not as low as this year's, American voters returned control of the House of Representatives to the Republicans, with the highest turnover in democratically held seats in the last 70-plus years. In the November 2012 elections, voters will face a divided government, with a Democratic president, a Democratic Senate, and the Republican House. 

This makes it unclear how Americans' historically low evaluations of the men and women they elect to represent them will be manifested at the voting booth next fall."

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Congressional Traitors Approved Provisions for Indefinite Arrests, and Detentions of U.S. Citizens, with no Due Processes, Mainly Those Who Criticize Government:

Enemies of the People & U.S. Constitution; Congressional Traitors Approved Provisions for Indefinite Arrests, and Detentions of U.S. Citizens, with no Due Processes, Mainly Those Who Criticize Government:
By Marc Chamot

S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, attacks on our liberties was passed to the dismay of Libertarians all over. 

What’s dangerous about this bill, any written comments, articles, through blogs, websites, tweets, Facebook, revolts, marches, that deem too critical of the state and government, it may cause your arrest and detentions without any constitutional due processes.

In other words; someone like me and thousands of others, who are constantly criticizing government, can be locked up forever, without seeing a lawyer or a courtroom or light of day.

Section 1031 of the National Defense Authorization Act otherwise known as the NDAA provides broad authority for the federal government, to use the military in domestic operations in order to detain Americans indefinitely and without trial.

Such a move not only whitewashes the natural rights of Americans, whereby even publicly criticizing the federal government can now rise to the purposefully vague definition of a "belligerent act", it also sits in direct violation of "Posse Comitatus" an 1878 law forbidding use of the military at home and against Americans.

The danger behind allowing any law that includes such arbitrary terms, as "belligerent act" simply cannot be overstated as the Department of Homeland Security has already published multiple reports labeling those who support the Constitution or protest the FEDERAL RESERVE to be "domestic belligerents" and thus in the eyes of the federal government a threat to National Security.

Even more disconcerting is the level of pompous disregard elected members of Congress show as they arrogantly eradicate the foundational principles of America, trampling upon the very ideals that helped spark the first American Revolution, with Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina recently stating during debate in the Senate.

We did not elect these people to be our rulers, or be our dictators. According to the U.S. constitution, we are the ones; we the people rule our government, not a political party dictatorship!

The real congressional criminals, the orchestrators of the crime against the U.S. constitution, the first to go folks; are Senator John McCain of Arizona and Senator Carl Levin of Michigan. They both are the schemers, orchestrators of this anti-constitutional evil bill, and they are enemies of the constitution of the United States.

Folks! Enough is enough! They are as corrupt as they come, and obviously most of those politicians are running scared of something, and us, they’ve got something to hide. It is time to replace the whole lot.

It’s time to replace the entire U.S. congress in 2012. They have outlived their usefulness, and have become traitors to the constitution and they have turned the United States into a dictatorial republic. 

Both houses approved the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, S-1867, both Democrats and Republicans voted for it, and the majority of them were Republicans, mainly Tea Party elected Republicans. This shows you, how wrong the Tea Party movement was wrong, when they elected this bunch of losers into office back in 2010.

It's up to Obama now, if President Barack Obama rejects this bill, he would look solid, and it would show his constitutional prowess that he claims he possesses, and it could be a bigger hole in the graves of GOP/Republicans, and mostly Tea Party Republicans, who voted in unison for this travesty of a sorry bill.

Here is the list of who voted for the bill, everyone listed here are traitors of the constitution, and it’s our duty to get rid of them in 2012.

(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)
      H R 1540      RECORDED VOTE      14-Dec-2011      6:58 PM
            BILL TITLE:  S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act
PRES
REPUBLICAN
190
43

8
DEMOCRATIC
93
93

6
INDEPENDENT




TOTALS
283
136

14



---- AYES    283 ---

Ackerman
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Amodei
Andrews
Austria
Baca
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Berkley
Berman
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boswell
Boustany
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Brown (FL)
Buchanan
Buerkle
Butterfield
Calvert
Camp
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Capps
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carter
Cassidy
Castor (FL)
Chabot
Chandler
Cicilline
Cole
Conaway
Connolly (VA)
Cooper
Costa
Courtney
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Culberson
Davis (CA)
Davis (KY)
Denham
Dent
Deutch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Dreier
Duffy
Ellmers
Emerson
Engel
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garamendi
Gardner
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Gonzalez
Granger
Graves (MO)
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanabusa
Hanna
Harper
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Higgins
Himes
Hirono
Hochul
Holden
Hoyer
Hultgren
Hunter
Inslee
Israel
Issa
Jackson Lee (TX)
Jenkins
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Keating
Kelly
Kildee
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kissell
Kline
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Langevin
Lankford
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
Latta
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Long
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lungren, Daniel E.
Manzullo
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCarthy (NY)
McCaul
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
McNerney
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Paulsen
Pearce
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peterson
Petri
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Price (GA)
Quayle
Rahall
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Reyes
Richardson
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Rothman (NJ)
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (WI)
Sánchez, Linda T.
Scalise
Schiff
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Sires
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Sullivan
Sutton
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tsongas
Turner (NY)
Turner (OH)
Upton
Visclosky
Walden
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waxman
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (FL)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (IN)


Saturday, December 17, 2011

Thefts of U.S. Benefits; San Francisco HUD Housing; Approx. 60% Going to Poor None-English Speaking ‘Elderly’ Chinese Immigrants, While City Has Record Homelessness of American Families With Children:

Thefts of U.S. Benefits; San Francisco HUD Housing; Approx. 60% Going to Poor None-English Speaking ‘Elderly’ Chinese Immigrants, While City Has Record Homelessness of American Families With Children:
By Marc Chamot

Historic Poverty in Census; American Families Poorer than Ever & Record Numbers of Children Homeless & Without Food.

The comment I keep hearing, over and over from poor San Franciscan’s, “our elected politicians care more for foreigners, than their own citizens.” However sad, it’s is very true, and that is what my blog, the Marc Chamot Report, has been trying to expose for the past three years.

America, once known for its land of milk and honey, has become the land of the poor and desperate. We’re not much different than Peru or any other despotic, third world nation in Latin America or Asia. We have finally imported so many poor, including the wanton invasion of illegal immigrants that the cancers of immigrant poverty, has stricken Americans in all walks of life.

The only difference here from China and Mexico, we‘ve got social safety nets, which is quickly declining, until it slowly fades away. Where as in Peru, Mexico or China, the poorest have to struggle daily for food, or they go hungry. We, as a nation, seem to have arrived into that same predicament.

It’s hard to believe that in 2011, we are witnessing the dismantling of American society. It wasn’t since the Great Depression that we’ve seen children homeless in masses, and in desperation for survival, only seen in ‘Banana Republics’ like Peru and Mexico.

My points of view, hate it, or love it; the real truths, we as a nation cannot support any more of the world’s poor to continually come here and compete for our benefits, contrary to popular beliefs that the poor come here to work. That is a lie being perpetrated, by pro-open borders and pro-immigration’s groups.

The real truths of the matter; poor immigrants’ are clamoring to come here into the United States, because the U.S. is a magnet for free welfare, and free handouts to poor immigrants, at the expense of its citizens. Most immigrants, who benefit, are those who cannot speak the English language or sustain themselves economically. And most cannot make it by themselves under any other circumstances.

San Francisco and California, is a classic case of massive welfare benefits being doled out to immigrants, mainly to elderly poor Chinese, who are not U.S. citizens, but whose families brought them, and made them wards of the state. But for poor Americans, HUD housing and food at food banks are rarely available to them.

About 60% or more of HUD housing in San Francisco are going to none-English speaking Asian Chinese elderly immigrants, who came here under false pretences, whose families brought them over, and made them wards of the state and of the U.S. welfare systems.

We have San Francisco American citizens, with families, and their children, who cannot get HUD housing, because it’s been all taken by elderly Chinese immigrants.

According to recent studies on San Francisco homelessness, so it surprises many people to learn that up to 25% of San Francisco’s homeless population consists of families with children.  "Sadly, this is a national trend: while the overall number of homeless people in the United States is on the decline, children and families make up the fastest growing segment of our country’s homeless population. 

Right now there are more homeless children in the United States than at any other time since the Great Depression.  At Compass, we are providing services to up to 300 or 400 children and their parents on any given day."

What used to be benefits reserved only for U.S. citizens and legal immigrants, it’s become free for all, from medical, schooling to higher education, housing and welfare support. This magnet that keeps attracting the world’s poor into the United States must be cut-off, sooner or later, or it will eventually affect our own safety nets.

The bottom line; When politicians like Jerry Brown says; “we’ve got to cut-off billions from welfare, because the state cannot sustain it,” Liberals like Jerry, isn’t going to say “okay U.S. citizens only, will be getting those benefits,” we all lose them, and we all suffer, Americans suffer, all because what should have been ours in the first place, was stolen by them.  

Apparently according to census reports, the American demise has already begun;

Census shows 1 in 2 people are poor or low-income “Squeezed by rising living costs, a record number of Americans — nearly 1 in 2 — have fallen into poverty or are scraping by on earnings that classify them as low income.

The latest census data depict a middle class that's shrinking as unemployment stays high and the government's safety net frays. The new numbers follow years of stagnating wages for the middle class that have hurt millions of workers and families.

"Safety net programs such as food stamps and tax credits kept poverty from rising even higher in 2010, but for many low-income families with work-related and medical expenses, they are considered too 'rich' to qualify," said Sheldon Danziger, a University of Michigan public policy professor who specializes in poverty.

"The reality is that prospects for the poor and the near poor are dismal," he said. "If Congress and the states make further cuts, we can expect the number of poor and low-income families to rise for the next several years."

Congressional Republicans and Democrats are sparring over legislation that would renew a Social Security payroll tax cut, part of a year-end political showdown over economic priorities that could also trim unemployment benefits, freeze federal pay and reduce entitlement spending.

Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, questioned whether some people classified as poor or low-income actually suffer material hardship. He said that while safety-net programs have helped many Americans, they have gone too far, citing poor people who live in decent-size homes, drive cars and own wide-screen TVs.

"There's no doubt the recession has thrown a lot of people out of work and incomes have fallen," Rector said. "As we come out of recession, it will be important that these programs promote self-sufficiency rather than dependence and encourage people to look for work."

Mayors in 29 cities say more than 1 in 4 people needing emergency food assistance did not receive it. Many middle-class Americans are dropping below the low-income threshold — roughly $45,000 for a family of four — because of pay cuts, a forced reduction of work hours or a spouse losing a job. Housing and child-care costs are consuming up to half of a family's income.

States in the South and West had the highest shares of low-income families, including Arizona, New Mexico and South Carolina, which have scaled back or eliminated aid programs for the needy. By raw numbers, such families were most numerous in California and Texas, each with more than 1 million.

The struggling Americans include Zenobia Bechtol, 18, in Austin, Texas, who earns minimum wage as a part-time pizza delivery driver. Bechtol and her 7-month-old baby were recently evicted from their bedbug-infested apartment after her boyfriend, an electrician, lost his job in the sluggish economy.
After an 18-month job search, Bechtol's boyfriend now works as a waiter and the family of three is temporarily living with her mother.

"We're paying my mom $200 a month for rent, and after diapers and formula and gas for work, we barely have enough money to spend," said Bechtol, a high school graduate who wants to go to college. "If it weren't for food stamps and other government money for families who need help, we wouldn't have been able to survive."

About 97.3 million Americans fall into a low-income category, commonly defined as those earning between 100 and 199 percent of the poverty level, based on a new supplemental measure by the Census Bureau that is designed to provide a fuller picture of poverty. 

Together with the 49.1 million who fall below the poverty line and are counted as poor, they number 146.4 million, or 48 percent of the U.S. population. That's up by 4 million from 2009, the earliest numbers for the newly developed poverty measure.

The new measure of poverty takes into account medical, commuting and other living costs. Doing that helped push the number of people below 200 percent of the poverty level up from 104 million, or 1 in 3 Americans, that was officially reported in September.

Broken down by age, children were most likely to be poor or low-income — about 57 percent — followed by seniors over 65. By race and ethnicity, Hispanics topped the list at 73 percent, followed by blacks, Asians and non-Hispanic whites.

Even by traditional measures, many working families are hurting.

Following the recession that began in late 2007, the share of working families who are low income has risen for three straight years to 31.2 percent, or 10.2 million. 

That proportion is the highest in at least a decade, up from 27 percent in 2002, according to a new analysis by the Working Poor Families Project and the Population Reference Bureau, a nonprofit research group based in Washington.

Among low-income families, about one-third were considered poor while the remainder — 6.9 million — earned income just above the poverty line. Many states phase out eligibility for food stamps, Medicaid, tax credit and other government aid programs for low-income Americans as they approach 200 percent of the poverty level.

The majority of low-income families — 62 percent — spent more than one-third of their earnings on housing, surpassing a common guideline for what is considered affordable. By some census surveys, child-care costs consume close to another one-fifth.

Paychecks for low-income families are shrinking. The inflation-adjusted average earnings for the bottom 20 percent of families have fallen from $16,788 in 1979 to just under $15,000, and earnings for the next 20 percent have remained flat at $37,000. In contrast, higher-income brackets had significant wage growth since 1979, with earnings for the top 5 percent of families climbing 64 percent to more than $313,000.

A survey of 29 cities conducted by the U.S. Conference of Mayors being released Thursday points to a gloomy outlook for those on the lower end of the income scale.

Many mayors cited the challenges of meeting increased demands for food assistance, expressing particular concern about possible cuts to federal programs such as food stamps and WIC, which assists low-income pregnant women and mothers. Unemployment led the list of causes of hunger in cities, followed by poverty, low wages and high housing costs.

Across the 29 cities, about 27 percent of people needing emergency food aid did not receive it. Kansas City, Mo., Nashville, Tenn., Sacramento, Calif., and Trenton, N.J., were among the cities that pointed to increases in the cost of food and declining food donations, while Mayor Michael McGinn in Seattle cited an unexpected spike in food requests from immigrants and refugees, particularly from Somalia, Burma and Bhutan.

Among that requesting emergency food assistance, 51 percent were in families, 26 percent were employed, 19 percent were elderly and 11 percent were homeless.

"People who never thought they would need food are in need of help," said Mayor Sly James of Kansas City, Mo., who co-chairs a mayors' task force on hunger and homelessness."

If the U.S. economy is improving, then why is child poverty in America absolutely exploding?  "If we are experiencing economic growth”, then why are more than half of all children in major U.S. cities like Cleveland and Detroit living in poverty?  If we are the greatest economy on earth”, then why is one out of every four American children on food stamps?  The shocking statistics that you are about to read below should absolutely break your heart. 

Tonight, millions of precious American children will go to bed without any dinner.  Tonight, millions of American children will shiver as they try to go to sleep because their families cannot afford any heat.  How bad does child poverty have to get before we all finally admit that our economic system is completely failing many of the most vulnerable members of our society? 

If you want someone to blame, you can blame Congress, the Obama administration, the Bush administration and the corrupt Wall Street bankers.  But most of all, blame the Federal Reserve and the debt-based monetary system that the Fed administers.  Our economy is in the midst of a long-term decline and is slowly but surely dying.  Many of those that are suffering the most from this decline are children.

The following are 16 shocking statistics about child poverty in America that will break your heart.
#1 Child homelessness in the United States is now 33 percent higher than it was back in 2007.
#2 According to the National Center on Family Homelessness, 1.6 millionAmerican children were living on the street, in homeless shelters or motels, or doubled up with other families last year”.
#3 The percentage of children living in poverty in the United States increased from 16.9 percent in 2006 to nearly 22 percent in 2010.  In the UK and in France the child poverty rate is well under 10 percent.
#4 A higher percentage of American children is living in poverty today than was living in poverty back in 1975.
#5 The number of children living in poverty in the U.S. has risen for four years in a row.
#6 There are 10 different U.S. states where at least one out of every four babies is born to a family living in poverty.
#7 Since 2007, the number of children living in poverty in the state of California has increased by 30 percent.
#8 According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, 36.4% of all children that live in Philadelphia are living in poverty, 40.1% of all children that live in Atlanta are living in poverty, 52.6% of all children that live in Cleveland are living in poverty and 53.6% of all children that live in Detroit are living in poverty.
#9 In the United States today, more than 35 percent of all African-American children are living in poverty and more than 33 percent of all Hispanic children are living in poverty.
#10 There are seven million children in the United States today that are not covered by health insurance at all.
#11 Today, one out of every seven Americans is on food stamps and one out of every four American children is on food stamps.
#12 It is being projected that approximately 50 percent of all U.S. children will be on food stamps at some point in their lives before they reach the age of 18.
#13 In 2010, 42 percent of all single mothers in the United States were on food stamps.
#14 There are 314 counties in the United States where at least 30% of the children are facing food insecurity.
#15 In Washington D.C., the “child food insecurity rate” is 32.3%.
#16 More than 20 million U.S. children rely on school meal programs to keep from going hungry.
So why are so many children suffering so badly?

Well, one reason is that millions of parents are unemployed.  The government tells us that the official unemployment rate is 8.6 percent, but when you take an honest look at the numbers the truth is that the situation is much worse than that."


Thursday, December 15, 2011

New York Times & Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. Voter ID Lies; Not Racism, It’s About Illegal Immigrants, Felons With Felonies & Double Voting Frauds Liberal Democrats Support:

New York Times & Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. Voter ID Lies; Not Racism, It’s About Illegal Immigrants, Felons With Felonies & Double Voting Frauds Liberal Democrats Support:
By Marc Chamot

It seems they’ve got racism confused with voting fraud. It’s all a big lie folks. It’s more about Barack Obama, Eric Holder and company, who are quickly realizing their voter fraud constituencies’ are quickly drying up for the 2012 elections.

In order to legally vote in California, voters must be at least 18, must be alive, and must be a Citizen of the United States, they cannot be recent felons, felons on parole, and they must be registered to vote and live in that district they vote in, and the voter can only vote one time in any election.

However, from San Francisco and all over California, it’s estimated that about 15% to 37% are casting fraudulent votes.

According to an election research done in Kern County, Ca in 2003, “we looked in detail at 2,460 of the 14,000 recently registered Democrat voters in Kern County that are registered to vote in the 30th Assembly District. 

We were shocked and dismayed by what we found. Of the 2,460 voters that were examined 905 of these people in this sample cast fraudulent ballots. For example, we found;
* 69 people actually admitted voting at least twice. These are just the ones who admitted it.
* 93 people admitted that they voted but are not citizens of the United States. They were told that if they registered and voted, it would help them get their citizenship.
* 272 people actually admitted that they do not live in the 30th Assembly District but that they voted in the 30th Assembly District

We also found people who changed the spelling of their name slightly so that they could register and vote a second time. Someone named William also registered as Bill. We found people with the same name registered at the same address whose birthdays were exactly one year or one day apart. By changing their birth date, one person became two people with two votes.

The biggest problem that we found was the number of people who showed up at the polls and voted using someone else's name. We have testimony from people who report that they went to vote and found that their name had already been used.

People impersonated the legitimate voter. How did they do that? A lot of people are registered but don't vote. Hanging on the wall in every polling place in the State of California is a list of the people that are eligible to vote at that polling place.

By state law, every two hours, an election worker up dates the list with the names of the people who have voted. The cheaters send in someone with a cell phone to call back to the headquarters with the names of the people who have not voted. People claiming to be those people miraculously show up and vote, without proof of ID’s.

We found 905 fraudulent ballots out of 2,460 voters. You do the math. Divide 905 by 2,460 you will get 37 percent. We estimate that 37 percent of the newly-registered Democrat voters who voted in the Kern County portion of the 30th Assembly District cast fraudulent votes.”

But according to the New York Times and Attorney General Eric Holder Jr., the Jr., and his stubborn boss at the White House, they don’t really know what it means, when the U.S. Supreme Court approved voter ID voting in all states, to help eliminate massive voting fraud.

Back in April, 2008, the Supreme Court upholds voter ID law, “The Supreme Court ruled that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID laws, to help eliminate rampant voting frauds.

In a splintered 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Indiana's strict photo ID requirement, which Democrats and civil rights groups said would deter poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots. Its backers said it was needed to prevent fraud.

The law "is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process,'" Justice John Paul Stevens said in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy. Stevens was a dissenter in Bush v. Gore in 2000.

More than 20 states require some form of identification at the polls. Courts have upheld voter ID laws in Arizona, Georgia and Michigan, but struck down Missouri's. Monday's decision comes a week before Indiana's presidential primary. The decision also could spur efforts to pass similar laws in other states.

Scalia, favoring a broader ruling in defenses of voter ID laws, said, "The universally applicable requirements of Indiana's voter-identification law are eminently reasonable. The burden of acquiring, possessing and showing free photo identification is simply not severe, because it does not 'even represent a significant increase over the usual burdens of voting.'"

Indiana provides IDs free of charge to the poor and allows voters who lack photo ID to cast a provisional ballot and then show up within 10 days at their county courthouse to produce identification or otherwise attest to their identity.

Stevens said these provisions also help reduce the burden on people who lack driver licenses.”

However, Eric Holder Speaks Up for Voting Rights, actually, Mr. Holder is speaking for mainly ‘African American’ felon’s right to commit mass voting frauds, rights for double voting and for illegal immigrants’ to vote, the usual voting base for Liberal Democrats. “For months, the Justice Department has largely been silent as Republican-dominated legislatures in state after state made it harder for minorities, poor people and other Democratic-leaning groups to vote.

On Tuesday, however, Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. spoke out forcefully and promised to use the full weight of his department to ensure that new electoral laws are not discriminatory. To live up to that vow, he will have his hands full.

Republican lawmakers in more than a dozen states have recently enacted laws designed to limit Americans’ access to the polls, often concentrating on voters — blacks, Hispanics, students and the poor — who showed up in large numbers in 2008 to elect Barack Obama.

The Big Lie, they want you to believe; they have imposed strict voter-ID requirements, knowing that millions of people cannot easily meet them; eliminated early voting periods; and restricted registration drives. (Voter ID laws have been introduced in at least 34 states.)

These efforts, Mr. Holder said, have led many Americans “to believe that we are failing to live up to one of our nation’s most noble, and essential, ideals.” Quoting John Lewis, the Georgia congressman who was beaten in the 1960s while advocating voting rights for blacks, he said those rights are under attack by “a deliberate and systematic attempt” to prevent millions of voters from exercising their constitutional right to engage in democracy.

Those cases are harder to make, particularly given the 2008 Supreme Court decision upholding Indiana’s voter ID law, but Mr. Holder at least suggested that his department would now actively be looking for patterns of discrimination in the new laws. As he noted, race continues to preoccupy many state officials.

Mr. Holder effectively demolished the phony voter-fraud excuse used by Republicans supporting these laws, pointing that such fraud happens far too infrequently to justify this kind of discrimination. And he called on citizens of every state to demand a voter registration system that is not cumbersome; allowing anyone eligible to exercise what Lyndon Johnson called “the basic right, without which all others are meaningless.”

Virtually every legal American in the United States, have access or carry ID cards, especially most people in welfare, poor welfare queens and daddy’s, those who get help from the government. They can’t get anything from the government, without any ID’s; they are required have to have them every time they renew their benefits and they are cheap. If they can’t get them, then they are not legal U.S. citizens.

Most people don’t buy Eric Holder’s lame and insane arguments about Voter ID, and neither did the U.S. Supreme Court in 2008. The only people in the U.S., who have no access to ID cards are felons with felonies, felons on the run and illegal immigrants.   

Recent Comments

FAIR USE POLICY:

Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted materials, with use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

I am making these materials available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc.

I am also using such materials to rebut and dispute arguments, when they ARE not based on FACTS.

I'm here to offer my own argument, opinions and judgments on the subject matters, which MAY interfere with my constitutional rights, towards receiving, fair political representations from my federal, state and local representatives.

I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes.

When I post photos, I may have inadvertently posted one without prior knowledge of actual ownerships.

If you feel I may have violated some of YOUR copyright of some sorts, you HAVE the right to email or post a comment, requesting my removal of such material(s), such as photos and full postings of articles, however I reserve the right to keep the main idea, snippets of your article on my blog, protected under the FAIR USE ACT.




"There are two major developments, she says, that are new this year and insufficiently noted, but they're going to shape election outcomes in 2010 and beyond. First, Washington is being revealed in a new way.

The American people now know, "with real sophistication," everything that happens in the capital. "I find a much more knowledgeable electorate, and it is a real-time response," Ms. Blackburn says. "We hear about it even as the vote is taking place."

Voters come to rallies carrying research—"things they pulled off the Internet, forwarded emails," copies of bills, roll-call votes. The Internet isn't just a tool for organization and fund-raising. It has given citizens access to information they never had before. "The more they know," Ms. Blackburn observes, "the less they like Washington."-Tennessee Representative Marsha Blackburn


Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population; by creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization; satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation; augmenting primitive feelings of envy; rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56494

The Obama Deception

MIA: Still No Border Security From Hapless Obama & U.S. Congress; SINCE

This BLOG Supports CANDIDATES that think for Americans FIRST. You, the candidate will get posted here and get my VOTE; only if you take care of our porous border, RID America of Criminal Illegal Aliens, No Amnesty, and Keeping American Jobs in America and improving our diminishing wages. Reducing our trade deficit with China and helping our dwindling economy and our middle class.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...